So, tell us again, why inventing a whole new bureaucracy for handling the massive logistics for this, represent a cost savings?
The USDA got out of the Gubmint Cheese and Peanut Butter bidness ages ago... with good reason.
In today's age with modern delivery systems the tax payers could save a bundle. I do all my shopping online. Just sent my son a care package at college. All he has to do is pick it up. It would be stupid to not take advantage of technologies and bulk pricing. I'm tired of tax payer money being used for alcohol and strip clubs. The Missouri audit showed those items were in high demand and were paid for with tax payer money.
Hey... inner-city ghetto trash gonna inner-city ghetto trash... there's always a way to scam the system.
Why don't you try building on what we already have, instead of lighting-up a sourcing, warehousing and logistics nightmarish throwback to the 1970s?
Imagine a poor mother who runs out of milk for her child in the middle of the night... having to wait 1-2 days for that shelf-stable milk to be delivered, rather than just taking her SNAP debit card down to the corner grocery store and picking-up and paying for that milk in real-time? Or cereal... or bread... or eggs... or whatever...
Besides... she's poor... flat-broke... she has no Internet access and you've taken away her ObamaPhone... how is she supposed to order? Wait 'til the Library opens so that she can walk down there with child in-tow and use the public computers?
Totally unworkable...
And, the logistics... I mean... Jesus-H-Christ !!! ... what a frigging nightmare...
Unless, of course, you're looking to enrich Amazon and WalMart and Uber, who would bend over like crack whores for a shot at such juicy Gubmint contracts...
So much for a competitive playing field and essentially precluding the possibility of Teddy Roosevelt -style Trust-Busting as these monsters get out of hand...
I know that Trump fans feel it their duty to push 'most any ideeer that comes out of the mouth of the Chief Twit(ter), but, I mean... c'mon... really?
-----------------------
There are ways to retain the Debit Card concept while greatly reducing fraud... tweaking what we have more intelligently rather than reinventing the goddamned wheel (again)...
You can start with narrowing the field of retailers who are authorized to accept the cards...
You can require the retailers to have customers show a photo ID when presenting their Debit Dcard ( screw the LibTards who object on economic grounds... Po' Folk get ;em free )...
Next-gen Debit Cards can be programmed to only work at a handful of local retailers - the card-holder gets to choose 1 or 2 grocery stores, 1 or 2 of this or that, and it won't work anywhere else...
Next-gen Debit Cards can be programmed to contain encrypted authentication data for future use...
Next-gen State ID Cards can be programmed to contain encrypted authentication data for future use...
Over time, you pay retailers to reprogram their card-swipe systems to require two cards... the Debit Card itself, then, secondly, the State ID... both containing encrypted authentication data...
Rather like swiping a Member Card and a Credit Card at a CostCo or Sams' Club gas station pump...
If the encrypted authentication data on the Debit Card does not match the encrypted authentication data on the State ID card, then the transaction is declined...
Every commodity that is purchased with such Debit Cards is barcode labeled and scanned, and the barcode holds the key to the generic nature of the item...
If the scanned item's categorization does not meet the Intended Usage sniff test then the item is declined and cannot be paid for with such a Debit Card...
So, unless your well-vetted and bonded Authorized SNAP Benefits Retailer is relabeling booze as baby formula or unless that strip-club hooker has a barcode on her ass...