Here is my question to Senate Repubs

[Hutch Starskey]

Any comparison between the attempted extortion of Ukraine to elicit a personal political favor for Don for which he alone would benefit and the US (as well as EU members and the IMF) seeking the removal of a corrupt prosecutor in Ukraine to combat corruption there is specious.

What personal gain did Trump get? Please show me this personal gain of yours.

What personal gain did Trump get? Please show me this personal gain of yours.

An army of idiots like yourself and even members of congress who are pushing the "corruption" narrative against the Bidens as well as the GRU "Ukrainian interference in 2016" narrative. It's already working for Trump's benefit thanks to you, dope. You just aren't smart enough to see that you are the intended target of such efforts. It is you dopes who support and propogate such nonsense.
Useful idiots.

Well done, comrade.

Could have saved yourself a little typing by just saying you can't answer the question either.

I did answer it, dope.

If you did, I certainly didn't see it. I'm sure most didn't either. So try again: what personal benefit did Trump get for withholding aid?

Try reading it again, dope.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

No, I watched some of it before it got too boring. The testimonies all had to do with presumptions, not fact. The facts were that Trump instructed Sondland of no quid pro quo's. That's the only order he gave to Sondland in this matter. The rest he made assumptions on, and also testified that's what others did as well.

No, I watched some of it before it got too boring. The testimonies all had to do with presumptions, not fact. The facts were that Trump instructed Sondland of no quid pro quo's. That's the only order he gave to Sondland in this matter. The rest he made assumptions on, and also testified that's what others did as well.

Your incompetence is noted.

Sondland was one of the people actually working on the ground to negotiate the investigation with the Ukranians, dope.

Don't take my word for it though.

Pay attention. He was talking about what Rudy said to him. But when he confronted Trump about it, here is what he testified to.

Yes, dope. He says quite clearly that Rudy was "expressing the desires of the POTUS".
Trump told Zalensky himself to "work with Rudy" on the call.

Is Rudy being impeached or Trump? This is about Trump, and Trump's word is much more relevant than what Rudy said.

Trump told all of the people from the State Dept to "talk to Rudy" when they asked for direction on Ukraine.
Trump told Zalensky to "work with Rudy" when he asked for his "favors" on the call

The WH withheld the funding. Not Rudy.

Now you're going to act as if Rudy went rogue and Trump knew nothing despite Trump directing them all to "talk to Rudy"?


Truly retarded.

Rudy is Trump's attorney. He doesn't speak for Trump's actions as a President. That's exclusively Trump's call.

Sondland testified that he was miffed by what Trump actually wanted through Rudy and others. So he called Trump directly and asked Trump what he was expecting. Trump answered he wanted nothing. He said (according to Sondland) that he didn't want any quid pro quo.

Now those are direct words from President Trump--not Rudy.

 

[Crepitus]

/—-/ Grand juries are held in private. Anyone leaking quotes is guilty of a crime. Shytface leaked testimony almost daily. He held hearings in public. Why are you being obtuse?

A better comparison would be the grand jury trial was equal to their basement hearings. The trial was actually the inquiry which in this case, the defense was not allowed to call their witnesses.

The trial will happen in the senate.

/—-/ Thank you Captain Obvious.

Don't get snippy, Missy. You needed to be told.

/——/ And you need to be told there may well be NO trial after all, Tinkerbell.

Liz Peek: Regretful Democrats locked into Trump impeachment – and paying a price for it

Liz Peek: Regretful Democrats locked into Trump impeachment – and paying a price for it

There will be a trial.

Who is "Liz peek"?

 

[Crepitus]

Nobody is hiding anything. Show me where anybody in the Trump administration demonstrated criminal activity.

We just had two weeks of public congressional testimony on that, did you sleep through it all?

No, I watched some of it before it got too boring. The testimonies all had to do with presumptions, not fact. The facts were that Trump instructed Sondland of no quid pro quo's. That's the only order he gave to Sondland in this matter. The rest he made assumptions on, and also testified that's what others did as well.

No, I watched some of it before it got too boring. The testimonies all had to do with presumptions, not fact. The facts were that Trump instructed Sondland of no quid pro quo's. That's the only order he gave to Sondland in this matter. The rest he made assumptions on, and also testified that's what others did as well.

Your incompetence is noted.

Sondland was one of the people actually working on the ground to negotiate the investigation with the Ukranians, dope.

Don't take my word for it though.

Pay attention. He was talking about what Rudy said to him. But when he confronted Trump about it, here is what he testified to.

Yes, dope. He says quite clearly that Rudy was "expressing the desires of the POTUS".
Trump told Zalensky himself to "work with Rudy" on the call.

These kids will not believe it unless tRump was to say "I want a quid pro quo" directly to them.

And that won't happen because I'm fairly certain he doesn't even understand what it means.

 

[Crepitus]

No, I watched some of it before it got too boring. The testimonies all had to do with presumptions, not fact. The facts were that Trump instructed Sondland of no quid pro quo's. That's the only order he gave to Sondland in this matter. The rest he made assumptions on, and also testified that's what others did as well.

No, I watched some of it before it got too boring. The testimonies all had to do with presumptions, not fact. The facts were that Trump instructed Sondland of no quid pro quo's. That's the only order he gave to Sondland in this matter. The rest he made assumptions on, and also testified that's what others did as well.

Your incompetence is noted.

Sondland was one of the people actually working on the ground to negotiate the investigation with the Ukranians, dope.

Don't take my word for it though.

Pay attention. He was talking about what Rudy said to him. But when he confronted Trump about it, here is what he testified to.

Yes, dope. He says quite clearly that Rudy was "expressing the desires of the POTUS".
Trump told Zalensky himself to "work with Rudy" on the call.

Is Rudy being impeached or Trump? This is about Trump, and Trump's word is much more relevant than what Rudy said.

Wait...........Trump's word? Please don't tell me you are still so gullible as to believe anything that inveterate liar says.

He does. He has to, or the other tRumplings will turn on him.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

We just had two weeks of public congressional testimony on that, did you sleep through it all?

No, I watched some of it before it got too boring. The testimonies all had to do with presumptions, not fact. The facts were that Trump instructed Sondland of no quid pro quo's. That's the only order he gave to Sondland in this matter. The rest he made assumptions on, and also testified that's what others did as well.

No, I watched some of it before it got too boring. The testimonies all had to do with presumptions, not fact. The facts were that Trump instructed Sondland of no quid pro quo's. That's the only order he gave to Sondland in this matter. The rest he made assumptions on, and also testified that's what others did as well.

Your incompetence is noted.

Sondland was one of the people actually working on the ground to negotiate the investigation with the Ukranians, dope.

Don't take my word for it though.

Pay attention. He was talking about what Rudy said to him. But when he confronted Trump about it, here is what he testified to.

Yes, dope. He says quite clearly that Rudy was "expressing the desires of the POTUS".
Trump told Zalensky himself to "work with Rudy" on the call.

These kids will not believe it unless tRump was to say "I want a quid pro quo" directly to them.

And that won't happen because I'm fairly certain he doesn't even understand what it means.

If you are accused of stealing a 500 cell phone, shouldn't you have that cell phone in your possession for somebody to make that accusation legitimate?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Your incompetence is noted.

Sondland was one of the people actually working on the ground to negotiate the investigation with the Ukranians, dope.

Don't take my word for it though.

Pay attention. He was talking about what Rudy said to him. But when he confronted Trump about it, here is what he testified to.

Yes, dope. He says quite clearly that Rudy was "expressing the desires of the POTUS".
Trump told Zalensky himself to "work with Rudy" on the call.

Is Rudy being impeached or Trump? This is about Trump, and Trump's word is much more relevant than what Rudy said.

Trump told all of the people from the State Dept to "talk to Rudy" when they asked for direction on Ukraine.
Trump told Zalensky to "work with Rudy" when he asked for his "favors" on the call

The WH withheld the funding. Not Rudy.

Now you're going to act as if Rudy went rogue and Trump knew nothing despite Trump directing them all to "talk to Rudy"?


Truly retarded.

Rudy is Trump's attorney. He doesn't speak for Trump's actions as a President. That's exclusively Trump's call.

Sondland testified that he was miffed by what Trump actually wanted through Rudy and others. So he called Trump directly and asked Trump what he was expecting. Trump answered he wanted nothing. He said (according to Sondland) that he didn't want any quid pro quo.

Now those are direct words from President Trump--not Rudy.

He said that for idiots like yourself who can't think critically. Obviously there was a QPQ.

Look at what Trump did not what he said.

The president withheld the funds.
The President wanted investigations per his call.
The President put Rudy on the case and told everyone to talk to Rudy.
Rudy was pushing for a public announcement of investigations.

One would have to be an idiot to think that Rudy was not acting on Trump's wishes.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Pay attention. He was talking about what Rudy said to him. But when he confronted Trump about it, here is what he testified to.

Yes, dope. He says quite clearly that Rudy was "expressing the desires of the POTUS".
Trump told Zalensky himself to "work with Rudy" on the call.

Is Rudy being impeached or Trump? This is about Trump, and Trump's word is much more relevant than what Rudy said.

Trump told all of the people from the State Dept to "talk to Rudy" when they asked for direction on Ukraine.
Trump told Zalensky to "work with Rudy" when he asked for his "favors" on the call

The WH withheld the funding. Not Rudy.

Now you're going to act as if Rudy went rogue and Trump knew nothing despite Trump directing them all to "talk to Rudy"?


Truly retarded.

Rudy is Trump's attorney. He doesn't speak for Trump's actions as a President. That's exclusively Trump's call.

Sondland testified that he was miffed by what Trump actually wanted through Rudy and others. So he called Trump directly and asked Trump what he was expecting. Trump answered he wanted nothing. He said (according to Sondland) that he didn't want any quid pro quo.

Now those are direct words from President Trump--not Rudy.

He said that for idiots like yourself who can't think critically. Obviously there was a QPQ.

Look at what Trump did not what he said.

The president withheld the funds.
The President wanted investigations per his call.
The President put Rudy on the case and told everyone to talk to Rudy.
Rudy was pushing for a public announcement of investigations.

/---/ All perfectly legal.

 

[bripat9643]

I have a simple litmus test for how seriously one really feels about this impeachment inquiry and how much you are just being a blind partisan. If everything was the same except the President being investigated was a Democrat and it was a Republican controlled House doing the impeachment inquiry would you still support it and if you are on the right would you still oppose it? For the record I feel this impeachment attempt is a total sham and is being doen simply because the Democrats did not get what they wanted with the Mueller investigation and if this was a Democrat President and Republican controlled House doing this I would feel the same way. Impeachment is a drastic and serious matter and should not used in a light hearted and trivial manner the way it is being used here I will remind the left this will not end when Trump leaves office one day the precedent that has been set by the Democrats with this attempted impeachment will be used against a Democrat President.

But............Trump broke the law when he solicited Ukraine's help in influencing a US election.

Section 201 - Bribery of public officials and witnesses, 18 U.S.C. § 201 | Casetext

Trump didn't bribe anyone, numskull.

 

[bripat9643]

They claim quid pro quo's are illegal, except when Biden and Hussein used them.

Any comparison between the attempted extortion of Ukraine to elicit a personal political favor for Don for which he alone would benefit and the US (as well as EU members and the IMF) seeking the removal of a corrupt prosecutor in Ukraine to combat corruption there is specious.

What personal gain did Trump get? Please show me this personal gain of yours.

The solicitation of an investigation in to the Biden's is in itself a crime even if it was not delivered, just as attempted robbery is a crime even if it is not successful.

What law does it violate?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Pay attention. He was talking about what Rudy said to him. But when he confronted Trump about it, here is what he testified to.

Yes, dope. He says quite clearly that Rudy was "expressing the desires of the POTUS".
Trump told Zalensky himself to "work with Rudy" on the call.

Is Rudy being impeached or Trump? This is about Trump, and Trump's word is much more relevant than what Rudy said.

Trump told all of the people from the State Dept to "talk to Rudy" when they asked for direction on Ukraine.
Trump told Zalensky to "work with Rudy" when he asked for his "favors" on the call

The WH withheld the funding. Not Rudy.

Now you're going to act as if Rudy went rogue and Trump knew nothing despite Trump directing them all to "talk to Rudy"?


Truly retarded.

Rudy is Trump's attorney. He doesn't speak for Trump's actions as a President. That's exclusively Trump's call.

Sondland testified that he was miffed by what Trump actually wanted through Rudy and others. So he called Trump directly and asked Trump what he was expecting. Trump answered he wanted nothing. He said (according to Sondland) that he didn't want any quid pro quo.

Now those are direct words from President Trump--not Rudy.

He said that for idiots like yourself who can't think critically. Obviously there was a QPQ.

Look at what Trump did not what he said.

The president withheld the funds.
The President wanted investigations per his call.
The President put Rudy on the case and told everyone to talk to Rudy.
Rudy was pushing for a public announcement of investigations.

Right, because Trump planned that his conversation with Sondland would be public in the near future, that's why he said it.

Yes, Trump did withhold funds, just like the many Presidents before him including Hussein.
You won't find the word "investigation" once in that phone transcript.
Yes, Trump put Rudy in charge, but not to make decisions for him in regards to policy.
Yes, he wanted an announcement. That's an impeachable offense?

 

[bripat9643]

They claim quid pro quo's are illegal, except when Biden and Hussein used them.

Any comparison between the attempted extortion of Ukraine to elicit a personal political favor for Don for which he alone would benefit and the US (as well as EU members and the IMF) seeking the removal of a corrupt prosecutor in Ukraine to combat corruption there is specious.

The theory that only Trump benefits when criminals are put in jail doesn't pass the laugh test, moron.

No one has demonstrated that the USA, EU or IMF were seeking the removal of the prosecutor.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Yes, dope. He says quite clearly that Rudy was "expressing the desires of the POTUS".
Trump told Zalensky himself to "work with Rudy" on the call.

Is Rudy being impeached or Trump? This is about Trump, and Trump's word is much more relevant than what Rudy said.

Trump told all of the people from the State Dept to "talk to Rudy" when they asked for direction on Ukraine.
Trump told Zalensky to "work with Rudy" when he asked for his "favors" on the call

The WH withheld the funding. Not Rudy.

Now you're going to act as if Rudy went rogue and Trump knew nothing despite Trump directing them all to "talk to Rudy"?


Truly retarded.

Rudy is Trump's attorney. He doesn't speak for Trump's actions as a President. That's exclusively Trump's call.

Sondland testified that he was miffed by what Trump actually wanted through Rudy and others. So he called Trump directly and asked Trump what he was expecting. Trump answered he wanted nothing. He said (according to Sondland) that he didn't want any quid pro quo.

Now those are direct words from President Trump--not Rudy.

He said that for idiots like yourself who can't think critically. Obviously there was a QPQ.

Look at what Trump did not what he said.

The president withheld the funds.
The President wanted investigations per his call.
The President put Rudy on the case and told everyone to talk to Rudy.
Rudy was pushing for a public announcement of investigations.

/---/ All perfectly legal.
View attachment 291802

We'll see.
Rudy Giuliani Is Now the Subject of Three Different Investigations: Report

 

[bripat9643]

Is Rudy being impeached or Trump? This is about Trump, and Trump's word is much more relevant than what Rudy said.

Trump told all of the people from the State Dept to "talk to Rudy" when they asked for direction on Ukraine.
Trump told Zalensky to "work with Rudy" when he asked for his "favors" on the call

The WH withheld the funding. Not Rudy.

Now you're going to act as if Rudy went rogue and Trump knew nothing despite Trump directing them all to "talk to Rudy"?


Truly retarded.

Rudy is Trump's attorney. He doesn't speak for Trump's actions as a President. That's exclusively Trump's call.

Sondland testified that he was miffed by what Trump actually wanted through Rudy and others. So he called Trump directly and asked Trump what he was expecting. Trump answered he wanted nothing. He said (according to Sondland) that he didn't want any quid pro quo.

Now those are direct words from President Trump--not Rudy.

He said that for idiots like yourself who can't think critically. Obviously there was a QPQ.

Look at what Trump did not what he said.

The president withheld the funds.
The President wanted investigations per his call.
The President put Rudy on the case and told everyone to talk to Rudy.
Rudy was pushing for a public announcement of investigations.

/---/ All perfectly legal.
View attachment 291802

We'll see.
Rudy Giuliani Is Now the Subject of Three Different Investigations: Report

The U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan (SDNY) - Trump haters.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Yes, dope. He says quite clearly that Rudy was "expressing the desires of the POTUS".
Trump told Zalensky himself to "work with Rudy" on the call.

Is Rudy being impeached or Trump? This is about Trump, and Trump's word is much more relevant than what Rudy said.

Trump told all of the people from the State Dept to "talk to Rudy" when they asked for direction on Ukraine.
Trump told Zalensky to "work with Rudy" when he asked for his "favors" on the call

The WH withheld the funding. Not Rudy.

Now you're going to act as if Rudy went rogue and Trump knew nothing despite Trump directing them all to "talk to Rudy"?


Truly retarded.

Rudy is Trump's attorney. He doesn't speak for Trump's actions as a President. That's exclusively Trump's call.

Sondland testified that he was miffed by what Trump actually wanted through Rudy and others. So he called Trump directly and asked Trump what he was expecting. Trump answered he wanted nothing. He said (according to Sondland) that he didn't want any quid pro quo.

Now those are direct words from President Trump--not Rudy.

He said that for idiots like yourself who can't think critically. Obviously there was a QPQ.

Look at what Trump did not what he said.

The president withheld the funds.
The President wanted investigations per his call.
The President put Rudy on the case and told everyone to talk to Rudy.
Rudy was pushing for a public announcement of investigations.

Right, because Trump planned that his conversation with Sondland would be public in the near future, that's why he said it.

Yes, Trump did withhold funds, just like the many Presidents before him including Hussein.
You won't find the word "investigation" once in that phone transcript.
Yes, Trump put Rudy in charge, but not to make decisions for him in regards to policy.
Yes, he wanted an announcement. That's an impeachable offense?

Yes, Trump did withhold funds,

Yes, he wanted an announcement. That's an impeachable offense?

That's a QPQ, dope.

 

[bripat9643]

Is Rudy being impeached or Trump? This is about Trump, and Trump's word is much more relevant than what Rudy said.

Trump told all of the people from the State Dept to "talk to Rudy" when they asked for direction on Ukraine.
Trump told Zalensky to "work with Rudy" when he asked for his "favors" on the call

The WH withheld the funding. Not Rudy.

Now you're going to act as if Rudy went rogue and Trump knew nothing despite Trump directing them all to "talk to Rudy"?


Truly retarded.

Rudy is Trump's attorney. He doesn't speak for Trump's actions as a President. That's exclusively Trump's call.

Sondland testified that he was miffed by what Trump actually wanted through Rudy and others. So he called Trump directly and asked Trump what he was expecting. Trump answered he wanted nothing. He said (according to Sondland) that he didn't want any quid pro quo.

Now those are direct words from President Trump--not Rudy.

He said that for idiots like yourself who can't think critically. Obviously there was a QPQ.

Look at what Trump did not what he said.

The president withheld the funds.
The President wanted investigations per his call.
The President put Rudy on the case and told everyone to talk to Rudy.
Rudy was pushing for a public announcement of investigations.

Right, because Trump planned that his conversation with Sondland would be public in the near future, that's why he said it.

Yes, Trump did withhold funds, just like the many Presidents before him including Hussein.
You won't find the word "investigation" once in that phone transcript.
Yes, Trump put Rudy in charge, but not to make decisions for him in regards to policy.
Yes, he wanted an announcement. That's an impeachable offense?

Yes, Trump did withhold funds,

Yes, he wanted an announcement. That's an impeachable offense?

That's a QPQ, dope.

So was the "treaty" Iran agreed to in exchange for $150 billion in cash.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Members of the POT (party of Trump) and their right wing media cohorts are free to express their opinion that the impeachment inquiry is a sham. But those allegations don't change the constitutional authority given to the House committees to lawfully conduct it. So riddle me this.
We know for an absolute certainty Trump has obstructed the inquiry by refusing to release requested documents and by ordering that subpoenaed witnesses not testify. Therefore, we know one of the articles of impeachment will include a charge of obstruction.
Senate Repubs can disingenuously claim the extortion of Ukraine does not, in their minds, rise to the level of an impeachable offense. But how will they get around the fact Trump has obstructed the inquiry?

As an aside, it should be noted the Trump admin may open itself up to the commission of another impeachable offense. The hypocritical Trump lackey known as Lindsey Graham has requested from the State Dept. documents pertaining to Joe Biden's activities with respect to the US government's demands the corrupt prosecutor Shokin be removed from office because he refused to prosecute cases of corruption in Ukraine. If the admin acquiesces to this request while blocking the release of documents sought by the House Intel Committee in the course of its impeachment inquiry it runs the risk of being charged with selectively releasing documents for investigations it favors. Representing yet another abuse of power.

I think your confusing a question with making accusations.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Trump told all of the people from the State Dept to "talk to Rudy" when they asked for direction on Ukraine.
Trump told Zalensky to "work with Rudy" when he asked for his "favors" on the call

The WH withheld the funding. Not Rudy.

Now you're going to act as if Rudy went rogue and Trump knew nothing despite Trump directing them all to "talk to Rudy"?


Truly retarded.

Rudy is Trump's attorney. He doesn't speak for Trump's actions as a President. That's exclusively Trump's call.

Sondland testified that he was miffed by what Trump actually wanted through Rudy and others. So he called Trump directly and asked Trump what he was expecting. Trump answered he wanted nothing. He said (according to Sondland) that he didn't want any quid pro quo.

Now those are direct words from President Trump--not Rudy.

He said that for idiots like yourself who can't think critically. Obviously there was a QPQ.

Look at what Trump did not what he said.

The president withheld the funds.
The President wanted investigations per his call.
The President put Rudy on the case and told everyone to talk to Rudy.
Rudy was pushing for a public announcement of investigations.

/---/ All perfectly legal.
View attachment 291802

We'll see.
Rudy Giuliani Is Now the Subject of Three Different Investigations: Report

The U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan (SDNY) - Trump haters.

Sure. Just "Trump haters" who still have to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt, dope.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Trump told all of the people from the State Dept to "talk to Rudy" when they asked for direction on Ukraine.
Trump told Zalensky to "work with Rudy" when he asked for his "favors" on the call

The WH withheld the funding. Not Rudy.

Now you're going to act as if Rudy went rogue and Trump knew nothing despite Trump directing them all to "talk to Rudy"?


Truly retarded.

Rudy is Trump's attorney. He doesn't speak for Trump's actions as a President. That's exclusively Trump's call.

Sondland testified that he was miffed by what Trump actually wanted through Rudy and others. So he called Trump directly and asked Trump what he was expecting. Trump answered he wanted nothing. He said (according to Sondland) that he didn't want any quid pro quo.

Now those are direct words from President Trump--not Rudy.

He said that for idiots like yourself who can't think critically. Obviously there was a QPQ.

Look at what Trump did not what he said.

The president withheld the funds.
The President wanted investigations per his call.
The President put Rudy on the case and told everyone to talk to Rudy.
Rudy was pushing for a public announcement of investigations.

Right, because Trump planned that his conversation with Sondland would be public in the near future, that's why he said it.

Yes, Trump did withhold funds, just like the many Presidents before him including Hussein.
You won't find the word "investigation" once in that phone transcript.
Yes, Trump put Rudy in charge, but not to make decisions for him in regards to policy.
Yes, he wanted an announcement. That's an impeachable offense?

Yes, Trump did withhold funds,

Yes, he wanted an announcement. That's an impeachable offense?

That's a QPQ, dope.

So was the "treaty" Iran agreed to in exchange for $150 billion in cash.

No, dope.

 

[bripat9643]

Rudy is Trump's attorney. He doesn't speak for Trump's actions as a President. That's exclusively Trump's call.

Sondland testified that he was miffed by what Trump actually wanted through Rudy and others. So he called Trump directly and asked Trump what he was expecting. Trump answered he wanted nothing. He said (according to Sondland) that he didn't want any quid pro quo.

Now those are direct words from President Trump--not Rudy.

He said that for idiots like yourself who can't think critically. Obviously there was a QPQ.

Look at what Trump did not what he said.

The president withheld the funds.
The President wanted investigations per his call.
The President put Rudy on the case and told everyone to talk to Rudy.
Rudy was pushing for a public announcement of investigations.

/---/ All perfectly legal.
View attachment 291802

We'll see.
Rudy Giuliani Is Now the Subject of Three Different Investigations: Report

The U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan (SDNY) - Trump haters.

Sure. Just "Trump haters" who still have to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt, dope.

Notice that they never investigate Democrats.

Barr will have to prove his case against the Bidens "beyond a reasonable doubt." What's your problem with investigating them?