Her name was Isabella Stroupe. She was 19... She was tied to a bed with a tow strap and tortured for months in an east Charlotte NC apartment.

Another rotten animal.

An animal who warned society, and the "justice" system" slapped him on the wrist and allowed this horror to happen.



Her name was Isabella Stroupe.
She was 19. She loved books. Her family called her Bella.
She was tied to a bed with a tow strap and tortured for months in an east Charlotte NC apartment.
Multiple broken bones.
St*b wounds.
R*ped repeatedly.
Her mother said she screamed and screamed when she found out.
Thomaz Hamilton, a violent repeat offender is charged with first-degree m*rder and first-degree r*pe.
Months. She was alive in there for months.
Say her name. Isabella Stroupe.
WE DO NOT HAVE TO LIVE LIKE THIS.



He was such a good boy. He didn't do nuffin!!!

:D :D :D
 
Please tell me how this contributes to the thread.
I know MAGAts are poorly educated and not that bright to begin with so I'll type this slowly and minimize using big words:
MAGAts are white nationalists. The excalibur cherry-picks only black criminals attacking white people. Manonthestreet supports the idea of imprisoning judges who are lenient toward black defendants. I posted the quiet part out loud: that what they really want to do is lynch black men. You know, just like the Good Ol' Days that so many MAGAt geezers want to go back to.

I disagree with MAGAt racism and their goal of shredding our Constitution and overthrowing our Republic in favor of a White Nationalist authoritarian state led by you-know-who.

Please let me know if that doesn't clear it up for you.
Black robe genocide.



Start throwing judges in jail
 
I know MAGAts are poorly educated and not that bright to begin with so I'll type this slowly and minimize using big words:
MAGAts are white nationalists. The excalibur cherry-picks only black criminals attacking white people. Manonthestreet supports the idea of imprisoning judges who are lenient toward black defendants. I posted the quiet part out loud: that what they really want to do is lynch black men. You know, just like the Good Ol' Days that so many MAGAt geezers want to go back to.

I disagree with MAGAt racism and their goal of shredding our Constitution and overthrowing our Republic in favor of a White Nationalist authoritarian state led by you-know-who.

Please let me know if that doesn't clear it up for you.

You wouldn't recognize a white nationilist if one punched you in the nose
 
By the numbers, you are probably correct. It's the motive that interests me. Gang bangers murdering each other have been problems since it was the Irish and the Italians murdering each other.

Murdering people because of their race, culture or religion is another matter. Consider the Irish Catholics vs. Protestants, the White Supremacist attacks on synagogues or American protestants murdering Mormons including the murder and attempted murder of their leader, Joseph Smith.

Oh its not PROBABLY. It's DEFINITELY. The most dangerous people in society for black men is other black men. Blacks kill other blacks at a FAR HIGHER rate than whites kill blacks. Literally almost 90% of all blacks are killed by other blacks. But when a white kills a black, it makes national headlines. But the 9 other blacks who died at the hands of their own race are swept under the rug by the democrats because it's not politically expedient to point out how blacks kill each other, only if whiteey does it.

"Black-on-black homicide is driven by geographic proximity and socioeconomic factors. On average, an estimated 8,000 to 11,000 Black individuals are victims of homicide annually, with the vast majority (about 80-90%) of these cases perpetrated by Black offenders." [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

 
Last edited:
Oh its not PROBABLY. It's DEFINITELY. The most dangerous people in society for black men is other black men. Blacks kill other blacks at a FAR HIGHER rate than whites kill blacks.
Sadly true. However, that's not the point of the thread much less looking for how best to correct the problem in a Constitutional manner. MAGAts only want to lynch them.
 
Sadly true. However, that's not the point of the thread much less looking for how best to correct the problem in a Constitutional manner. MAGAts only want to lynch them.

The constitution and SCOTUS have stated or ruled that the death penalty is legal for murder. So we want to kill these killers, and that's legal.
 
The constitution and SCOTUS have stated or ruled that the death penalty is legal for murder. So we want to kill these killers, and that's legal.
Lynching isn't legal nor is imprisoning judges for following the law no matter how unpopular. Labeling them "leftists" is so simplistic it's moronic.

What the MAGA morons can't comprehend is that, while "cutting the fat" is good, cutting into meat and bone is not. When judges and both prosecutors and public defenders are fired, the justice system becomes backlogged. Due to Constitutional rights which favors the defendant, this can result in the problems noted in this thread.

Solutions? Raise taxes, restore the justice system, implement a mental healthcare system to identify and treat individual problems before they become a public problem.
 
Lynching isn't legal nor is imprisoning judges for following the law no matter how unpopular. Labeling them "leftists" is so simplistic it's moronic.

What the MAGA morons can't comprehend is that, while "cutting the fat" is good, cutting into meat and bone is not. When judges and both prosecutors and public defenders are fired, the justice system becomes backlogged. Due to Constitutional rights which favors the defendant, this can result in the problems noted in this thread.

Solutions? Raise taxes, restore the justice system, implement a mental healthcare system to identify and treat individual problems before they become a public problem.

Firing judges who allow this kind of crap is not bad when you replace them with judges who won't. Do you really think when someone says to fire these judges, they mean and not refill the position? Are you really that stupid? Firing bad judges, or even putting them in prison, and replacing them with ones who will follow the law and protect society (which is their number one job) is not wrong and will not cause any backlog.
 
Firing judges who allow this kind of crap is not bad when you replace them with judges who won't. Do you really think when someone says to fire these judges, they mean and not refill the position? Are you really that stupid? Firing bad judges, or even putting them in prison, and replacing them with ones who will follow the law and protect society (which is their number one job) is not wrong and will not cause any backlog.
You want to hire judges who violate the Constitution? Do you realize that the same problems of prosecutors, public defenders and overcrowded prisons still exist?
Yes, since those advocating it are frequent idiots who only whine and never offer viable solutions.
Your insults indicate you lack education and intelligence.
What would you imprison judges for? For failing to be good little White Nationalists?
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom