Oz and the Orchestra
Platinum Member
"The prime directive is that she's entertaining and impressing people with a talent she has".Well, that say's it all - if she's been at it for 5 years and still not managed a recording contract.Or you could listen to her other videos on her channel going back about 5 years and realize the talent is CLEARLY AUTHENTICALL OF THE ABOVE. That's exactly the way I likes 'em! But the point (the one you missed) is that Slyhunter is aroused by her and that's proof enough that she possesses attributes beyond a good voice.Well let's analyze this.That's how most females achieve celebrities status ... a kick-start based upon attributes other than talent.awesome voice but I'm thinking dirty thoughts.
She has NO TITS
She showed no ass
Her chin could poke out your eye
She wore very little make up
She had pj's on ffs
So what attributes was she relying on if not her voice?
BY THE WAY .... It ought to be obvious to anyone that this video is synced, and ..... almost certainly a "voice-over". In other words, it's fake.
This seems to imply that "recording contract" is the goal, which is a dicey assumption. The prime directive is that she's entertaining and impressing people with a talent she has. Everything after that is just gravy.
Besides which, recording contracts sometimes fuck things up royally. Because then you're "owned".
Nicks wrote the song and many other hits. Your comparing a young karaoke singer to a songwriter singer who has produced and sold millions and millions of recordings over a period of decades.I would argue she is as good or better than Stevie NicksYeah grampa we seen it before, she doesn't haven't crispy voice.
Here again "Singer X has 'sold millions' is irrelevant to talent. That's ALL marketing. Some of the most amazing talent I've ever seen or heard, and I'm sure you have too, has never "sold millions". That's a commodity-fetish mentality, sold by the same recording industry that stands to enrich itself from the exploitation thereof.
Bottom line "Artist X has a recording contract" or "Artist Y has sold N number of records" are not measures of talent. They're a measure of a recording company's profit margin.
You seem to be a little confused. That may or may not be the young lady's objective but as we don't even know her name that is just your ASSUMPTION.
We can only go on what the OP asked of us - to make the girl a superstar, that is what this thread happens to be about. For that to happen she needs to take one of a few tried and tested routes.
Laying in her bedroom performing karaoke covers is not going to hack it.
There are very few that you can call genuine 'superstars'. Looking at it from a British point of view at successful females I can only think of three in the last decade. Amy Whinehouse, Adelle, and Leona Lewis.
The first two wrote their own material which is massively important as they earn all the royalties.
Leona Lewis falls more into the Streisand, Dion type and though none write their own material, all have exceptional voices. Lewis also had to win a national talent show to send her on her way with the backing of a powerful recording company.
Unless you can afford to buy a recording company with a global reach you can't become a 'superstar'.
The only other way I can think of in the situation our girl is in is to improve her video performances to the point that she is getting so many hits the advertisers offer to pay her. - I think that is how Justin Bieber got started but at some point, she will still need a record company to come in and sign her as he did.
So just to recap the OP's objective is for us to help this girl become a 'superstar' and not just send posts in admiration.