Heidi Cruz History Of Mental Problems

[bripat9643]

Are you saying Heidi is mentally ill?

According to your article, she suffers from depression. That is a mental illness.

Wrong. She had an episode of depression.
She cured her mental illness. Lakhota, not so much.

Maybe she did maybe she didn't. Depression can often be life long. Why should that make a difference?

Because it's a non-issue. Any evidence she still suffers from depression? Nope.

What I find ineresting is why it's so important to you to prove she no longer suffers from any mental illness? So what if she does?

Despicable unscrupulous turds like you will use it as an excuse to attack Cruz, as you have already done.

 

[bripat9643]

Sorry, I disagree. The claim that it can't be eliminated is utterly groundless. Eliminating it will be far more painless than implementing it.

Unfortunately me thinks him right. What major government policy has ever been rescinded? Prohibition comes to mind but that about the only one I can think of. Obamacare might be transformed but certainly, if track record proves correct, it will never be completely eliminated.

Well, there will certainly be massive resistance to rescinding it, but that isn't because it will be technically difficult to do. It's only because bureaucrats have already built their power bases based on its existence. It's purely a political problem, not a technical or economic problem.

Could, but won't, agreed.

I think there is a good chance that it will. There is significant public opposition to obamacare. I think any politician who votes against a repeal does so at his peril, especially if they reimplement the few parts the public likes, such as the elimination of denial for pre-existing conditions. It won't matter what the bureaucrats want.

I don't sense a lot of opposition except by some unions. The reason being is that the VAST majority of people are not directly effected. They still have their employer supplied health care. Those are the people who are in favor of Obamacare, those who have employer based and are getting subsidized, those in the middle, not so much but they are in the vast minority.

Employers are going to start dropping their healthcare coverage like flies.

 

[hadit]

Ted Cruz eliminated himself from serious contention for POTUS because of his stance on obamacare.

The ACA at this point is part of the scenery, it can't be removed from the body politic without killing the host.

Ted Cruz' obsession with eliminating it disqualifies him from serious contention.

Republicans need to wake up on this point. The ACA is here to stay

Sorry, I disagree. The claim that it can't be eliminated is utterly groundless. Eliminating it will be far more painless than implementing it.

Of course. START with demanding full repeal, then compromise on something short of that. It's the old bargaining tool, start with an extreme to pull the ultimate conclusion closer to what you really wanted in the first place. If your opening bid is your actual desired closing price, you will never get close to what you want.

 

[Coyote]

According to your article, she suffers from depression. That is a mental illness.

Wrong. She had an episode of depression.
She cured her mental illness. Lakhota, not so much.

Maybe she did maybe she didn't. Depression can often be life long. Why should that make a difference?

Because it's a non-issue. Any evidence she still suffers from depression? Nope.

What I find ineresting is why it's so important to you to prove she no longer suffers from any mental illness? So what if she does?

Despicable unscrupulous turds like you will use it as an excuse to attack Cruz, as you have already done.

Where?

 

[Freewill]

Unfortunately me thinks him right. What major government policy has ever been rescinded? Prohibition comes to mind but that about the only one I can think of. Obamacare might be transformed but certainly, if track record proves correct, it will never be completely eliminated.

Well, there will certainly be massive resistance to rescinding it, but that isn't because it will be technically difficult to do. It's only because bureaucrats have already built their power bases based on its existence. It's purely a political problem, not a technical or economic problem.

Could, but won't, agreed.

I think there is a good chance that it will. There is significant public opposition to obamacare. I think any politician who votes against a repeal does so at his peril, especially if they reimplement the few parts the public likes, such as the elimination of denial for pre-existing conditions. It won't matter what the bureaucrats want.

I don't sense a lot of opposition except by some unions. The reason being is that the VAST majority of people are not directly effected. They still have their employer supplied health care. Those are the people who are in favor of Obamacare, those who have employer based and are getting subsidized, those in the middle, not so much but they are in the vast minority.

Employers are going to start dropping their healthcare coverage like flies.

They already have. A major company in my area got the Union to agreed to drop retirees who retire before 65 after 2016. The company had already screwed their management employees. One can argue that the retirees don't deserve it but, I say it was deferred compensation which was taken from them. The same company had been paying 3000 for those retirees on medicare and they stopped that also and it has nothing to do with Obamacare. So yes, companies will start dropping people.

And where will these people go? Only one place, Obamacare market. Are they then going to vote to remove that safety net?

Think about how this scam was well played.

Big business doesn't want to mess with healthcare with the cost escalating every year. So they get it passed for the little people, those they say can't get healthcare. They force Obamacare down the majority of people's throats. After that they then make the people dependent on Obamacare thus it is never going away.

You see it happening and the growth of Healthcare insurance companies tells me that someone see a whole lot of money to be made.

The only advice I can give is, live with it, it is in your future.

 

[bripat9643]

Ted Cruz eliminated himself from serious contention for POTUS because of his stance on obamacare.

The ACA at this point is part of the scenery, it can't be removed from the body politic without killing the host.

Ted Cruz' obsession with eliminating it disqualifies him from serious contention.

Republicans need to wake up on this point. The ACA is here to stay

Sorry, I disagree. The claim that it can't be eliminated is utterly groundless. Eliminating it will be far more painless than implementing it.

Of course. START with demanding full repeal, then compromise on something short of that. It's the old bargaining tool, start with an extreme to pull the ultimate conclusion closer to what you really wanted in the first place. If your opening bid is your actual desired closing price, you will never get close to what you want.

Anything less than full repeal would be a disaster.

 

[bripat9643]

Well, there will certainly be massive resistance to rescinding it, but that isn't because it will be technically difficult to do. It's only because bureaucrats have already built their power bases based on its existence. It's purely a political problem, not a technical or economic problem.

Could, but won't, agreed.

I think there is a good chance that it will. There is significant public opposition to obamacare. I think any politician who votes against a repeal does so at his peril, especially if they reimplement the few parts the public likes, such as the elimination of denial for pre-existing conditions. It won't matter what the bureaucrats want.

I don't sense a lot of opposition except by some unions. The reason being is that the VAST majority of people are not directly effected. They still have their employer supplied health care. Those are the people who are in favor of Obamacare, those who have employer based and are getting subsidized, those in the middle, not so much but they are in the vast minority.

Employers are going to start dropping their healthcare coverage like flies.

They already have. A major company in my area got the Union to agreed to drop retirees who retire before 65 after 2016. The company had already screwed their management employees. One can argue that the retirees don't deserve it but, I say it was deferred compensation which was taken from them. The same company had been paying 3000 for those retirees on medicare and they stopped that also and it has nothing to do with Obamacare. So yes, companies will start dropping people.

And where will these people go? Only one place, Obamacare market. Are they then going to vote to remove that safety net?

Think about how this scam was well played.

Big business doesn't want to mess with healthcare with the cost escalating every year. So they get it passed for the little people, those they say can't get healthcare. They force Obamacare down the majority of people's throats. After that they then make the people dependent on Obamacare thus it is never going away.

You see it happening and the growth of Healthcare insurance companies tells me that someone see a whole lot of money to be made.

The only advice I can give is, live with it, it is in your future.

The only businesses that wanted this disaster are the insurance companies.

 

[Freewill]

Could, but won't, agreed.

I think there is a good chance that it will. There is significant public opposition to obamacare. I think any politician who votes against a repeal does so at his peril, especially if they reimplement the few parts the public likes, such as the elimination of denial for pre-existing conditions. It won't matter what the bureaucrats want.

I don't sense a lot of opposition except by some unions. The reason being is that the VAST majority of people are not directly effected. They still have their employer supplied health care. Those are the people who are in favor of Obamacare, those who have employer based and are getting subsidized, those in the middle, not so much but they are in the vast minority.

Employers are going to start dropping their healthcare coverage like flies.

They already have. A major company in my area got the Union to agreed to drop retirees who retire before 65 after 2016. The company had already screwed their management employees. One can argue that the retirees don't deserve it but, I say it was deferred compensation which was taken from them. The same company had been paying 3000 for those retirees on medicare and they stopped that also and it has nothing to do with Obamacare. So yes, companies will start dropping people.

And where will these people go? Only one place, Obamacare market. Are they then going to vote to remove that safety net?

Think about how this scam was well played.

Big business doesn't want to mess with healthcare with the cost escalating every year. So they get it passed for the little people, those they say can't get healthcare. They force Obamacare down the majority of people's throats. After that they then make the people dependent on Obamacare thus it is never going away.

You see it happening and the growth of Healthcare insurance companies tells me that someone see a whole lot of money to be made.

The only advice I can give is, live with it, it is in your future.

The only businesses that wanted this disaster are the insurance companies.

By what I see, I disagree. They scammed us and now we have to live with their scam.

 

[bripat9643]

I think there is a good chance that it will. There is significant public opposition to obamacare. I think any politician who votes against a repeal does so at his peril, especially if they reimplement the few parts the public likes, such as the elimination of denial for pre-existing conditions. It won't matter what the bureaucrats want.

I don't sense a lot of opposition except by some unions. The reason being is that the VAST majority of people are not directly effected. They still have their employer supplied health care. Those are the people who are in favor of Obamacare, those who have employer based and are getting subsidized, those in the middle, not so much but they are in the vast minority.

Employers are going to start dropping their healthcare coverage like flies.

They already have. A major company in my area got the Union to agreed to drop retirees who retire before 65 after 2016. The company had already screwed their management employees. One can argue that the retirees don't deserve it but, I say it was deferred compensation which was taken from them. The same company had been paying 3000 for those retirees on medicare and they stopped that also and it has nothing to do with Obamacare. So yes, companies will start dropping people.

And where will these people go? Only one place, Obamacare market. Are they then going to vote to remove that safety net?

Think about how this scam was well played.

Big business doesn't want to mess with healthcare with the cost escalating every year. So they get it passed for the little people, those they say can't get healthcare. They force Obamacare down the majority of people's throats. After that they then make the people dependent on Obamacare thus it is never going away.

You see it happening and the growth of Healthcare insurance companies tells me that someone see a whole lot of money to be made.

The only advice I can give is, live with it, it is in your future.

The only businesses that wanted this disaster are the insurance companies.

By what I see, I disagree. They scammed us and now we have to live with their scam.

If you believe that, then you believe that democracy is doomed to blow up.

 

[Freewill]

I don't sense a lot of opposition except by some unions. The reason being is that the VAST majority of people are not directly effected. They still have their employer supplied health care. Those are the people who are in favor of Obamacare, those who have employer based and are getting subsidized, those in the middle, not so much but they are in the vast minority.

Employers are going to start dropping their healthcare coverage like flies.

They already have. A major company in my area got the Union to agreed to drop retirees who retire before 65 after 2016. The company had already screwed their management employees. One can argue that the retirees don't deserve it but, I say it was deferred compensation which was taken from them. The same company had been paying 3000 for those retirees on medicare and they stopped that also and it has nothing to do with Obamacare. So yes, companies will start dropping people.

And where will these people go? Only one place, Obamacare market. Are they then going to vote to remove that safety net?

Think about how this scam was well played.

Big business doesn't want to mess with healthcare with the cost escalating every year. So they get it passed for the little people, those they say can't get healthcare. They force Obamacare down the majority of people's throats. After that they then make the people dependent on Obamacare thus it is never going away.

You see it happening and the growth of Healthcare insurance companies tells me that someone see a whole lot of money to be made.

The only advice I can give is, live with it, it is in your future.

The only businesses that wanted this disaster are the insurance companies.

By what I see, I disagree. They scammed us and now we have to live with their scam.

If you believe that, then you believe that democracy is doomed to blow up.

First of all, the US is a republic. No one got a direct vote on Obama care and my representatives were split on the vote, one R and one D. So me having a direct input, nil.

Most of those picked up on Obamacare were actually picked up because the requirements for medicaid were changed. There is little difference, that I see, between medicare, medicaid and Obamacare. It is my opinion that medicaid and medicare are not going anywhere and that means, sadly, that Obamacare isn't either.

 

[bripat9643]

Employers are going to start dropping their healthcare coverage like flies.

They already have. A major company in my area got the Union to agreed to drop retirees who retire before 65 after 2016. The company had already screwed their management employees. One can argue that the retirees don't deserve it but, I say it was deferred compensation which was taken from them. The same company had been paying 3000 for those retirees on medicare and they stopped that also and it has nothing to do with Obamacare. So yes, companies will start dropping people.

And where will these people go? Only one place, Obamacare market. Are they then going to vote to remove that safety net?

Think about how this scam was well played.

Big business doesn't want to mess with healthcare with the cost escalating every year. So they get it passed for the little people, those they say can't get healthcare. They force Obamacare down the majority of people's throats. After that they then make the people dependent on Obamacare thus it is never going away.

You see it happening and the growth of Healthcare insurance companies tells me that someone see a whole lot of money to be made.

The only advice I can give is, live with it, it is in your future.

The only businesses that wanted this disaster are the insurance companies.

By what I see, I disagree. They scammed us and now we have to live with their scam.

If you believe that, then you believe that democracy is doomed to blow up.

First of all, the US is a republic. No one got a direct vote on Obama care and my representatives were split on the vote, one R and one D. So me having a direct input, nil.

How does that alter the fact that you believe we can't repeal bad legislation once it becomes law? If we can't do that, then this country is doomed.

Most of those picked up on Obamacare were actually picked up because the requirements for medicaid were changed. There is little difference, that I see, between medicare, medicaid and Obamacare. It is my opinion that medicaid and medicare are not going anywhere and that means, sadly, that Obamacare isn't either.

Irrelevant minutiae.

 

[hadit]

Ted Cruz eliminated himself from serious contention for POTUS because of his stance on obamacare.

The ACA at this point is part of the scenery, it can't be removed from the body politic without killing the host.

Ted Cruz' obsession with eliminating it disqualifies him from serious contention.

Republicans need to wake up on this point. The ACA is here to stay

Sorry, I disagree. The claim that it can't be eliminated is utterly groundless. Eliminating it will be far more painless than implementing it.

Of course. START with demanding full repeal, then compromise on something short of that. It's the old bargaining tool, start with an extreme to pull the ultimate conclusion closer to what you really wanted in the first place. If your opening bid is your actual desired closing price, you will never get close to what you want.

Anything less than full repeal would be a disaster.

It could be gutted and reformed to something more useful. Keep the name and do it right.

 

[OKTexas]

Why'd you answer the questions for me?

I didn't...which is why I put a question mark behind the "no". In truth, we all know the answer; you are no more happy, no more proud, and less enriched by your idiotic, tragic, juvenile, and classless actions here today so obviously the answer is no...

Which begs the final question; why do it? I doubt you're person enough to answer it...am I right? We'll see...won't we.

Why do it? Because I wanted to. Because I'm entitled to. Because it's based on facts. Because it's political. Because Commie Canuck Ted Cruz has formally announced his presidential candidacy. Because Heidi is now a public figure aspiring to be First Lady of the United States. Because Heidi took a leave of absence from Goldman Sachs to be an adviser to the campaign. Because there was a police report.

Do any of those answers satisfy your self-righteousness?

It satisfies my suspicion that you're a feckless loser. Nothing more.

As for self-righteousness...I'm far from it. A 7 year old would know that you were wrong to highlight her condition as it does nothing except make those who suffer from mental illness less willing to discuss it and seek help...because if they do, some asshole like yourself is waiting to snipe at them from the cowardly veil of anonymity.

Judging by your footer you're in the same barrel of shit of the person you're trying to admonish, by trying to hang one ignorant post on a whole party.

One ignorant post? Hardly...facts are facts and apparently it's perfectly okay to play the parlor game about who is mentally ill and who isn't.

I'm certainly not stating Native Americans are like Lakhota....every one I've met (living in Arizona, there are plenty I have come across during hikes in the North of the State) would rather eat dirt than go out of their way to lambast someone's wife because they don't like her husband's politics. Lakhota is the exception to such decency.

Nice deflection, care to address what I actually said?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Did Michelle Obama receive any therapy before her transgender reassignment?

 

[candycorn]

I didn't...which is why I put a question mark behind the "no". In truth, we all know the answer; you are no more happy, no more proud, and less enriched by your idiotic, tragic, juvenile, and classless actions here today so obviously the answer is no...

Which begs the final question; why do it? I doubt you're person enough to answer it...am I right? We'll see...won't we.

Why do it? Because I wanted to. Because I'm entitled to. Because it's based on facts. Because it's political. Because Commie Canuck Ted Cruz has formally announced his presidential candidacy. Because Heidi is now a public figure aspiring to be First Lady of the United States. Because Heidi took a leave of absence from Goldman Sachs to be an adviser to the campaign. Because there was a police report.

Do any of those answers satisfy your self-righteousness?

It satisfies my suspicion that you're a feckless loser. Nothing more.

As for self-righteousness...I'm far from it. A 7 year old would know that you were wrong to highlight her condition as it does nothing except make those who suffer from mental illness less willing to discuss it and seek help...because if they do, some asshole like yourself is waiting to snipe at them from the cowardly veil of anonymity.

Judging by your footer you're in the same barrel of shit of the person you're trying to admonish, by trying to hang one ignorant post on a whole party.

One ignorant post? Hardly...facts are facts and apparently it's perfectly okay to play the parlor game about who is mentally ill and who isn't.

I'm certainly not stating Native Americans are like Lakhota....every one I've met (living in Arizona, there are plenty I have come across during hikes in the North of the State) would rather eat dirt than go out of their way to lambast someone's wife because they don't like her husband's politics. Lakhota is the exception to such decency.

Nice deflection, care to address what I actually said?

Address your judgment of me? Now that's another reason to laugh....

 

[OKTexas]

Why do it? Because I wanted to. Because I'm entitled to. Because it's based on facts. Because it's political. Because Commie Canuck Ted Cruz has formally announced his presidential candidacy. Because Heidi is now a public figure aspiring to be First Lady of the United States. Because Heidi took a leave of absence from Goldman Sachs to be an adviser to the campaign. Because there was a police report.

Do any of those answers satisfy your self-righteousness?

It satisfies my suspicion that you're a feckless loser. Nothing more.

As for self-righteousness...I'm far from it. A 7 year old would know that you were wrong to highlight her condition as it does nothing except make those who suffer from mental illness less willing to discuss it and seek help...because if they do, some asshole like yourself is waiting to snipe at them from the cowardly veil of anonymity.

Judging by your footer you're in the same barrel of shit of the person you're trying to admonish, by trying to hang one ignorant post on a whole party.

One ignorant post? Hardly...facts are facts and apparently it's perfectly okay to play the parlor game about who is mentally ill and who isn't.

I'm certainly not stating Native Americans are like Lakhota....every one I've met (living in Arizona, there are plenty I have come across during hikes in the North of the State) would rather eat dirt than go out of their way to lambast someone's wife because they don't like her husband's politics. Lakhota is the exception to such decency.

Nice deflection, care to address what I actually said?

Address your judgment of me? Now that's another reason to laugh....

Feel free to laugh at your demonstrated hypocrisy, I really don't care. Hypocrisy is a standard trait for you lefties, perfect examples are Lakhota and yourself.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Another 20 months of this nasty shit.

No doubt you folks are proud of it, I'm just glad my mind doesn't work this way.

.

There's a reason they're named the demagogue party....

 

[ChrisL]

They already have. A major company in my area got the Union to agreed to drop retirees who retire before 65 after 2016. The company had already screwed their management employees. One can argue that the retirees don't deserve it but, I say it was deferred compensation which was taken from them. The same company had been paying 3000 for those retirees on medicare and they stopped that also and it has nothing to do with Obamacare. So yes, companies will start dropping people.

And where will these people go? Only one place, Obamacare market. Are they then going to vote to remove that safety net?

Think about how this scam was well played.

Big business doesn't want to mess with healthcare with the cost escalating every year. So they get it passed for the little people, those they say can't get healthcare. They force Obamacare down the majority of people's throats. After that they then make the people dependent on Obamacare thus it is never going away.

You see it happening and the growth of Healthcare insurance companies tells me that someone see a whole lot of money to be made.

The only advice I can give is, live with it, it is in your future.

The only businesses that wanted this disaster are the insurance companies.

By what I see, I disagree. They scammed us and now we have to live with their scam.

If you believe that, then you believe that democracy is doomed to blow up.

First of all, the US is a republic. No one got a direct vote on Obama care and my representatives were split on the vote, one R and one D. So me having a direct input, nil.

How does that alter the fact that you believe we can't repeal bad legislation once it becomes law? If we can't do that, then this country is doomed.

Most of those picked up on Obamacare were actually picked up because the requirements for medicaid were changed. There is little difference, that I see, between medicare, medicaid and Obamacare. It is my opinion that medicaid and medicare are not going anywhere and that means, sadly, that Obamacare isn't either.

Irrelevant minutiae.

You know, I don't agree with Obamacare simply because I think it's unconstitutional to make people buy a product. However, you are ridiculous, like a Chicken Little or something. The country is DOOMED!

 

[bripat9643]

The only businesses that wanted this disaster are the insurance companies.

By what I see, I disagree. They scammed us and now we have to live with their scam.

If you believe that, then you believe that democracy is doomed to blow up.

First of all, the US is a republic. No one got a direct vote on Obama care and my representatives were split on the vote, one R and one D. So me having a direct input, nil.

How does that alter the fact that you believe we can't repeal bad legislation once it becomes law? If we can't do that, then this country is doomed.

Most of those picked up on Obamacare were actually picked up because the requirements for medicaid were changed. There is little difference, that I see, between medicare, medicaid and Obamacare. It is my opinion that medicaid and medicare are not going anywhere and that means, sadly, that Obamacare isn't either.

Irrelevant minutiae.

You know, I don't agree with Obamacare simply because I think it's unconstitutional to make people buy a product. However, you are ridiculous, like a Chicken Little or something. The country is DOOMED!

I said "IF we can't repeal bad legislation, this country is doomed." However, the fact is, this country has been swirling around the toilet bowl since WW II. Democracy is doomed to blow up. It's a one way process. It can't be reversed.

 

[ChrisL]

By what I see, I disagree. They scammed us and now we have to live with their scam.

If you believe that, then you believe that democracy is doomed to blow up.

First of all, the US is a republic. No one got a direct vote on Obama care and my representatives were split on the vote, one R and one D. So me having a direct input, nil.

How does that alter the fact that you believe we can't repeal bad legislation once it becomes law? If we can't do that, then this country is doomed.

Most of those picked up on Obamacare were actually picked up because the requirements for medicaid were changed. There is little difference, that I see, between medicare, medicaid and Obamacare. It is my opinion that medicaid and medicare are not going anywhere and that means, sadly, that Obamacare isn't either.

Irrelevant minutiae.

You know, I don't agree with Obamacare simply because I think it's unconstitutional to make people buy a product. However, you are ridiculous, like a Chicken Little or something. The country is DOOMED!

I said "IF we can't repeal bad legislation, this country is doomed." However, the fact is, this country has been swirling around the toilet bowl since WW II. Democracy is doomed to blow up. It's a one way process. It can't be reversed.

Things change. That doesn't mean the world is doomed, and no one says that you cannot repeal bad legislation. You have to convince people that it actually IS bad legislation. I think the penalties that people have to pay in their taxes should be repealed. Americans should not be forced to buy a product by threat of fine, which is actually what this is, being a loophole through taxation.