Heat Generated by 120 ppm of additional CO2

[Crick]

And your hot spot is where again?

In the lower troposphere at lower latitudes. Why?

Prove it with empirical evidence.

View attachment 251944

I have posted these twice. I'm quite sure you have seen them. That would make your demand to see them more than a little disingenuous.

Climate Meme Debunked As The ‘Tropospheric Hot Spot’ Is Found

Climate scientists find elusive tropospheric hot spot

New study finds a hot spot in the atmosphere | John Abraham

Climate scientists find warming in higher atmosphere: Elusive tropospheric hot spot located

 

[SSDD]

So, CO2 generates heat now? What an amazing energy source it must be!

Go take a gradeschool science class.

If you believe CO2 generates heat, it is you who is due for a grade school class.

If you think that's what he was saying you need to go back farther than that.

Can you provide a single piece of observed measured evidence which establishes a coherent link between the absorption of infrared radiation by a gas, and warming in the atmosphere...

We both know that you can't...and I know that you can't because none exists...

 

[Billy_Bob]

And your hot spot is where again?

In the lower troposphere at lower latitudes. Why?

Prove it with empirical evidence.

View attachment 251944

I have posted these twice. I'm quite sure you have seen them. That would make your demand to see them more than a little disingenuous.

Climate Meme Debunked As The ‘Tropospheric Hot Spot’ Is Found

Climate scientists find elusive tropospheric hot spot

New study finds a hot spot in the atmosphere | John Abraham

Climate scientists find warming in higher atmosphere: Elusive tropospheric hot spot located

And they are all garbage models that failed empirical review.. Come on Crick... POST UP EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE LIKE I DID!

 

[Crick]

The only reason you're looking for a tropospheric hotspot is a model. If they're all crap, there is no hotspot.

Make up your mind.

 

[mamooth]

My apologies to flac for misattributing this to him before.

You know what the IPCC and every other climate change cult lacks?

Statisticians. People whose job is the science of change over time.

IPCC statisticians
---
Statisticians involved with IPCC Assessments
Knut Alfsen, Statistics Norway
Mark Berliner, Ohio State University
Peter Bloomfield, North Carolina State University
K Brekke, Statistics Norway
David Brillinger, UC Berkeley
Torstein Bye, Statistics Norway
Riccardo De Lauretis, APAT, Italy
Reinhard Furrer, Colorado School of Mines
Peter Guttorp, University of Washington
Tom-Regel Heggedal Statistics Norway
Jim Hughes, University of Washington
Richard Katz, National Center for Atmospheric Research
Robert Kaufmann, Boston University
Riitta Pipatti, Statistics Finland
Daniela Romano, APAT, Italy
Knut Einar Rosendahl, Statistics Norway
Andrew Solow, Woods Hole Institute
Claudia Tebaldi, Rand Corporation
Dennis Trewin, Australian Bureau of Statistics
Angelica Tudini, ISTAT, Italy
Francis Zwiers, Environment Canada
---

https://ww2.amstat.org/committees/ccpac/pdfs/StatisticiansRole.pdf
---
Statisticians have played a major role in developing new methods for the analysis, interpretation and graphical display of climatic data from both observational networks and climate models. We have published numerous papers in both statistics and subject-matter journals, and contributed to the reports of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the U.S. government's Climate Change Science Program (CCSP).
---

Climate "scientists" write their own models. And they suck at it.

Then why have the model predictions been so accurate? All of your claims are flatly contradicted by reality.