He supposedly got 81 million votes.

[Lastamender]

You're stuck at square one. Your conspiracy is utterly dependent on 10s of millions of fake ballots being produced.

And you have no evidence that this ever happened. Nested assumptions aren't evidence. They're an excuse for it.

You're stuck.

Actually it is dependent on six counties. The six counties where fake votes put Biden in the lead overnight and stole 71 electoral votes by stealing those states.

 

[Skylar]

Give me full reign and government resources to investigate the 2020 election and I will, ******.

Nope. You're nobody. And no one with any authority is handing it over to you.

If you had evidence, you'd present it. Instead, you're demanding authority in hopes of FINDING evidence you don't actually have.

Demonstrating elegantly that your conspiracy was never based on evidence. The conspiracy came first. And you've been desperately scrambling to find anything to support it ever since.

Winners win. Losers snivel about why they lost.

 

[Lastamender]

And the burden is completely on them to prove it.

The real fun starts in their sniveling excuses why.

The courts never allowed an evidentuary hearing to prove anything. One more time, a FACT you cannot change.

 

[Lastamender]

Nope. You're nobody. And no one with any authority is handing it over to you.

If you had evidence, you'd present it. Instead, you're demanding authority in hopes of FINDING evidence you don't actually have.

Demonstrating elegantly that your conspiracy was never based on evidence. The conspiracy came first. And you've been desperately scrambling to find anything to support it ever since.

Winners win. Losers snivel about why they lost.

How did the conspiracy come before the impossibly lopsided ballot drops? Let me know.

 

[SaxonJackson]

Yeap that's what they say and still proud today.

A complete imbecile!! And I'd like to take this opportunity to apologize to all imbeciles for the insult.

 

[Skylar]

The courts never allowed an evidentuary hearing to prove anything. One more time, a FACT you cannot change.

Again, bullshit. Many of the Big Lie claims were heard in court and laughed out of it. Take Mellissa Calrone and her claims about the same ballots being read and re-read 8 to 10 times. This claim was presented in court and a judge found that it lacked credibility.....as Melissa reported no such thing on site. And no one reported any such thing, including the half dozen republican observers who were on site and watched the vote counts.

So when one of your conspiracies fail, you just make up a new one, backed by jackshit. ANd then insist that this NEW conspiracy has 'never been reviewed by the court'. Just like every Sovereign Citizen, Truther, or Birther before you.

Worse, Trump had a trial scheduled where he could present any evidence he wanted. He could call witnesses. He could have witnesses cross examined. But the day before the trial to start....

Trump voluntarily dismissed his own case.

"On the eve of getting the day in court they supposedly were begging for, President Trump and Chairman David Shafer’s legal team folded Thursday and voluntarily dismissed their election contests against Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger rather than submit their evidence to a court and to cross-examination."

Trump Legal Team Folds | Georgia Secretary of State

President Trump and Chairman David Shafer’s legal team folded Thursday and voluntarily dismissed their election contests.

sos.ga.gov

Worse still, you already know this.

And About The Stolen Election....

Until they have to reveal their source code. and the public are the ones who will elect Trump for the third time. CNN is going to 'reveal their source code'? I think you may be confused. Remember, Trump already had a chance to call witnesses, to hold them to account under oath, to present...

www.usmessageboard.com

And yet you continue to lie that the courts 'never allowed' evidentiary hearings.

Your conspiracy *literally* requires lies. If your claims had merit, you could tell the truth.

 

[Lastamender]

Again, bullshit. Many of the Big Lie claims were heard in court and laughed out of it. Take Mellissa Calrone and her claims about the same ballots being read and re-read 8 to 10 times. This claim was presented in court and a judge found that it lacked credibility.....as Melissa reported no such thing on site. And no one reported any such thing, including the half dozen republican observers who were on site and watched the vote counts.

So when one of your conspiracies fail, you just make up a new one, backed by jackshit. ANd then insist that this NEW conspiracy has 'never been reviewed by the court'. Just like every Sovereign Citizen, Truther, or Birther before you.

Worse, Trump had a trial scheduled where he could present any evidence he wanted. He could call witnesses. He could have witnesses cross examined. But the day before the trial to start....

Trump voluntarily dismissed his own case.

"On the eve of getting the day in court they supposedly were begging for, President Trump and Chairman David Shafer’s legal team folded Thursday and voluntarily dismissed their election contests against Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger rather than submit their evidence to a court and to cross-examination."

Trump Legal Team Folds | Georgia Secretary of State

President Trump and Chairman David Shafer’s legal team folded Thursday and voluntarily dismissed their election contests.

sos.ga.gov

Worse still, you already know this.

View attachment 784148

And About The Stolen Election....

Until they have to reveal their source code. and the public are the ones who will elect Trump for the third time. CNN is going to 'reveal their source code'? I think you may be confused. Remember, Trump already had a chance to call witnesses, to hold them to account under oath, to present...

www.usmessageboard.com

And yet you continue to lie that the courts 'never allowed' evidentiary hearings.

Your conspiracy *literally* requires lies. If your claims had merit, you could tell the truth.

It is not a lie. There was no evidentiary hearing. What happened in GA. means shit and is most likely the result of intimidation and threats..

 

[BlindBoo]

The courts never allowed an evidentuary hearing to prove anything. One more time, a FACT you cannot change.

Can't have one of those if the lawyer doesn't have any evidence to present. The Judges were practically begging the Trump lawyers for evidence they claimed in the public domain.

Why did they make wild claims on the "Faux's Liars Club" that they had no evidence for?

 

[Skylar]

It is not a lie. There was no evidentiary hearing.

Again, evidence was presented in court. Again and again. And it was found to be laughable dogshit.

Worse, Trump had a trial scheduled where he could present any evidence he wanted and call witnesses.

He voluntarily dismissed his own case a day before the trial was to begin. Being a victim was more important to him than presenting his evidence.

And you know all of this. You just really hope we don't.

 

[The Duke]

It is not a lie. There was no evidentiary hearing.

They wouldn't even consider it.

 

[Skylar]

Can't have one of those if the lawyer doesn't have any evidence to present. The Judges were practically begging the Trump lawyers for evidence they claimed in the public domain.

Why did they make wild claims on the "Faux's Liars Club" that they had no evidence for?

For the same reason that Trump voluntarily dismissed his own case in Georgia.

"On the eve of getting the day in court they supposedly were begging for, President Trump and Chairman David Shafer’s legal team folded Thursday and voluntarily dismissed their election contests against Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger rather than submit their evidence to a court and to cross-examination."

Trump Legal Team Folds | Georgia Secretary of State

President Trump and Chairman David Shafer’s legal team folded Thursday and voluntarily dismissed their election contests.

sos.ga.gov

Because being a victim is more important to Trump than presenting his 'evidence'.

And the 'evidence' is dogshit. The 'whistleblower' that his lawyer Sidney Powell found regarding Dominion was just a crazy lady sending an Email, who openly admitted that the basis of her claims were 'special dreams' that she'd had since she was a child. Oh, and that she'd been 'internally decapitated' and yet lived.

If you're on Fox News, talking to lemmings like Last, you can speak of a nebulous 'whistleblower'. If you're in court, you have to present the batshit crazy Email backed by nothing but 'special dreams'.

 

[Skylar]

They wouldn't even consider it.

Trump had access to an entire TRIAL, where he could present his evidence and call witnesses. Everything your ilk had ever said you wanted....Trump had the opportunity to present.

And the day before the trial was set to begin....what did Trump do?

"On the eve of getting the day in court they supposedly were begging for, President Trump and Chairman David Shafer’s legal team folded Thursday and voluntarily dismissed their election contests against Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger rather than submit their evidence to a court and to cross-examination."

Why? Because being a victim is way more important to Trump than presenting evidence.

Just like it is for you.

 

[Lastamender]

Can't have one of those if the lawyer doesn't have any evidence to present. The Judges were practically begging the Trump lawyers for evidence they claimed in the public domain.

Why did they make wild claims on the "Faux's Liars Club" that they had no evidence for?

Those are media lies. You are a fool.

 

[Lastamender]

Trump had access to an entire TRIAL, where he could present his evidence and call witnesses. Everything your ilk had ever said you wanted....Trump had the opportunity to present.

And the day before the trial was set to begin....what did Trump do?

"On the eve of getting the day in court they supposedly were begging for, President Trump and Chairman David Shafer’s legal team folded Thursday and voluntarily dismissed their election contests against Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger rather than submit their evidence to a court and to cross-examination."

Why? Because being a victim is way more important to Trump than presenting evidence.

Just like it is for you.

I have told you before you are projecting that victim crap. Keeping it up will not change that fact.

 

[BlindBoo]

Those are media lies. You are a fool.

"Trump and his allies’ public allegations stand in stark contrast to what his lawyers are actually claiming— bound by professional ethics rules—in election-related cases in court. In three separate lawsuits in Pennsylvania and cases in Arizona and Nevada, Trump’s lawyers have jettisoned sweeping claims of fraud, instead focusing on relatively small-bore complaints."

In Court, Trump's Lawyers Aren't Claiming 'Massive' Fraud

While the President and his lawyers make histrionic claims in public, the campaign's legal filings are narrow in scope

time.com

Here’s a look at some prominent instances in which Trump’s lawyers have conspicuously refused to embrace the language of “fraud” while standing before judges, quietly undercutting the President and his allies’ increasingly histrionic public stance.

 

[Skylar]

Those are media lies. You are a fool.

Or, she's just been following the case.


"US District Judge Linda Parker made the comments at a contentious hearing on Zoom whose purpose was to determine whether the lawyers should face sanctions.

Parker repeatedly criticized the attorneys as failing to do "minimal" research on the "evidence" they presented as part of their multipronged effort — which Powell called the "Kraken" — to nullify the election results in Michigan, Georgia, Wisconsin, and Arizona.

"The court is concerned that these affidavits were submitted in bad faith," Parker said."

A federal judge skewered 'Kraken' lawyers for making 'fantastical' allegations of election fraud and failing to do the most basic due diligence

Judge Linda Parker accused the Kraken team of submitting nonsense affidavits in "bad faith" and of not doing even "minimal" investigation.

www.businessinsider.com

Your conspiracy requires an ignorant audience. But most damning, your conspiracy requires your own desperate, willful ignorance.

Now make your conspiracy just a little bit more fantastical, tinfoil.....and fold Judge Linda Parker into it too.

 

[Skylar]

"Trump and his allies’ public allegations stand in stark contrast to what his lawyers are actually claiming— bound by professional ethics rules—in election-related cases in court. In three separate lawsuits in Pennsylvania and cases in Arizona and Nevada, Trump’s lawyers have jettisoned sweeping claims of fraud, instead focusing on relatively small-bore complaints."

In Court, Trump's Lawyers Aren't Claiming 'Massive' Fraud

While the President and his lawyers make histrionic claims in public, the campaign's legal filings are narrow in scope

time.com

Here’s a look at some prominent instances in which Trump’s lawyers have conspicuously refused to embrace the language of “fraud” while standing before judges, quietly undercutting the President and his allies’ increasingly histrionic public stance.

Again, Last was being fed conspiracy pablum on Fox News......that Trump's lawyers knew were factually indefensible in court. Which is why they backpedaled from the claims Trump's team were spewing publicly, refusing to defend them.....or provide evidence for them.

Despite the court's request that they do so.

Last was lied to yet again. And yet, still believes his dogshit conspiracy nonsense.

 

[Lastamender]

"Trump and his allies’ public allegations stand in stark contrast to what his lawyers are actually claiming— bound by professional ethics rules—in election-related cases in court. In three separate lawsuits in Pennsylvania and cases in Arizona and Nevada, Trump’s lawyers have jettisoned sweeping claims of fraud, instead focusing on relatively small-bore complaints."

In Court, Trump's Lawyers Aren't Claiming 'Massive' Fraud

While the President and his lawyers make histrionic claims in public, the campaign's legal filings are narrow in scope

time.com

Here’s a look at some prominent instances in which Trump’s lawyers have conspicuously refused to embrace the language of “fraud” while standing before judges, quietly undercutting the President and his allies’ increasingly histrionic public stance.

Prominent to the lying media. not me.

 

[Skylar]

Prominent to the lying media. not me.

Oh, you never believed the mindless conspiracy pablum being pumped out by Fox, right?

 

[Lastamender]

Oh, you never believed the mindless conspiracy pablum being pumped out by Fox, right?

View attachment 784157

What difference does that make? i have always believed Trump was defrauded. I did not need FOX to tell me. Actually, the Federalist had more to do with it.