Has the MSM told you that of China's 81,591 case.. 73,280 recovered or almost 90% recovery..

[healthmyths]

That is a recovery rate of nearly 90% and deaths of about 4%.

Now my point is why haven't we heard that from the MSM? Isn't that good news?
But I've not heard that from ANY of the 7/24 cable shows especially as they are certainly I would think be looking for "good news" for the public.
Why not?

ArcGIS Dashboards

ArcGIS Dashboards

www.arcgis.com

 

[bluzman61]

That is a recovery rate of nearly 90% and deaths of about 4%.

Now my point is why haven't we heard that from the MSM? Isn't that good news?
But I've not heard that from ANY of the 7/24 cable shows especially as they are certainly I would think be looking for "good news" for the public.
Why not?

ArcGIS Dashboards

ArcGIS Dashboards

www.arcgis.com

View attachment 314943

Of COURSE the lamestream media won't mention this. It would tone down our national hysteria, and we can't have THAT! We MUST keep blaming the Wu Flu on our president.....

 

[forkup]

That is a recovery rate of nearly 90% and deaths of about 4%.

Now my point is why haven't we heard that from the MSM? Isn't that good news?
But I've not heard that from ANY of the 7/24 cable shows especially as they are certainly I would think be looking for "good news" for the public.
Why not?

ArcGIS Dashboards

ArcGIS Dashboards

www.arcgis.com

View attachment 314943

4 percent? Four percent of the US population is about 12.6 million deaths. Don't think that's good news. I personally think that number is high. So let's assume not 4 percent but 1. And not everybody gets infected so half of the population. Conservative according to health experts. So 1.6 million dead citizens. Still think 4 percent is good news?

 

[JGalt]

That is a recovery rate of nearly 90% and deaths of about 4%.

Now my point is why haven't we heard that from the MSM? Isn't that good news?
But I've not heard that from ANY of the 7/24 cable shows especially as they are certainly I would think be looking for "good news" for the public.
Why not?

ArcGIS Dashboards

ArcGIS Dashboards

www.arcgis.com

View attachment 314943

That sounds puny compared to this year's Influenza stats. The CDC estimates that so far this season there have been at least 34 million flu illnesses, 350,000 hospitalizations and 20,000 deaths from flu.

I think we're being played by the media.

 

[forkup]

That is a recovery rate of nearly 90% and deaths of about 4%.

Now my point is why haven't we heard that from the MSM? Isn't that good news?
But I've not heard that from ANY of the 7/24 cable shows especially as they are certainly I would think be looking for "good news" for the public.
Why not?

ArcGIS Dashboards

ArcGIS Dashboards

www.arcgis.com

View attachment 314943

That sounds puny compared to this year's Influenza stats. The CDC estimates that so far this season there have been at least 34 million flu illnesses, 350,000 hospitalizations and 20,000 deaths from flu.

I think we're being played by the media.

34 million infection and 20000 deaths mean a mortality rate of 0.05 percent. The Op was stating a mortality rate of 4 percent. Making this thing 80 times more deadly.

 

[JGalt]

That is a recovery rate of nearly 90% and deaths of about 4%.

Now my point is why haven't we heard that from the MSM? Isn't that good news?
But I've not heard that from ANY of the 7/24 cable shows especially as they are certainly I would think be looking for "good news" for the public.
Why not?

ArcGIS Dashboards

ArcGIS Dashboards

www.arcgis.com

View attachment 314943

4 percent? Four percent of the US population is about 12.6 million deaths. Don't think that's good news. I personally think that number is high. So let's assume not 4 percent but 1. And not everybody gets infected so half of the population. Conservative according to health experts. So 1.6 million dead citizens. Still think 4 percent is good news?

Do the math: Out of a population of 1.38 billion Chinese, only
81,591 were infected. That's only 0.0059% of the total population that was infected.

The US population is 327.17 million people. At the same rate of infection, that would mean a total of 1,930303 will eventually be infected in the US. That would equate to 77,212 deaths overall in the US, if our model follows China, which I doubt.

Check my math, if you have any doubts.

 

[Pogo]

That is a recovery rate of nearly 90% and deaths of about 4%.

Now my point is why haven't we heard that from the MSM? Isn't that good news?
But I've not heard that from ANY of the 7/24 cable shows especially as they are certainly I would think be looking for "good news" for the public.
Why not?

ArcGIS Dashboards

ArcGIS Dashboards

www.arcgis.com

View attachment 314943

We've been pointing this out every day in the CV tracking thread, DUMBASS. Maybe you're just too dim to notice.

 

[Pogo]

That is a recovery rate of nearly 90% and deaths of about 4%.

Now my point is why haven't we heard that from the MSM? Isn't that good news?
But I've not heard that from ANY of the 7/24 cable shows especially as they are certainly I would think be looking for "good news" for the public.
Why not?

ArcGIS Dashboards

ArcGIS Dashboards

www.arcgis.com

View attachment 314943

Of COURSE the lamestream media won't mention this. It would tone down our national hysteria, and we can't have THAT! We MUST keep blaming the Wu Flu on our president.....

IT ISN"T A FUCKING SECRET, FOR CHRISSAKE IT'S RIGHT THERE IN THE FUCKING TABLES.
BEEN THERE THE WHOLE TIME TOO.

Country, Other	Total Cases	New Cases	Total Deaths	New Deaths	Total Recovered	Active Cases	Serious, Critical	Tot Cases/ 1M pop	Tot Deaths/ 1M pop
China	81,218	+47	3,281	+4	73,650	4,287	1,399	56	2
Italy	69,176		6,820		8,326	54,030	3,393	1,144	113
USA	54,823		778		378	53,667	1,175	166	2
Spain	42,058		2,991		3,794	35,273	2,636	900	64
Germany	32,991		159		3,290	29,542	23	394	2
Iran	24,811		1,934		8,913	13,964		295	23
France	22,304		1,100		3,281	17,923	2,516	342	17
Switzerland	9,877		122		131	9,624	141	1,141	14
S. Korea	9,037		120		3,507	5,410	59	176	2
UK	8,077		422		135	7,520	20	119	6
Netherlands	5,560		276		2	5,282	435	324	16
Austria	5,283		28		9	5,246	22	587	3
Belgium	4,269		122		461	3,686	381	368	11
Norway	2,866		12		6	2,848	44	529	2
Canada	2,792		26		112	2,654	1	74	0.7
Portugal	2,362		33		22	2,307	48	232	3
Australia	2,317		8		118	2,191	11	91	0.3

Good GOD people wake the FUCK UP.

 

[IM2]

The so called MSM had doctors talking about percentages from the start. We should be not be minimizing death. If you or one of your family members dies, the percentages are irrelevant. Stop trying to blame the media for trumps incompetence.

 

[Pogo]

And the reason China has 22 times more recovered than dead (including a 103 year old) while we have two dead for every one recovery, is because it's had the most TIME to recover. WE have not had that, that's why we're on the verge of leading the world in active cases.

China is past the worst of it. WE have yet to get there.

 

[forkup]

That is a recovery rate of nearly 90% and deaths of about 4%.

Now my point is why haven't we heard that from the MSM? Isn't that good news?
But I've not heard that from ANY of the 7/24 cable shows especially as they are certainly I would think be looking for "good news" for the public.
Why not?

ArcGIS Dashboards

ArcGIS Dashboards

www.arcgis.com

View attachment 314943

4 percent? Four percent of the US population is about 12.6 million deaths. Don't think that's good news. I personally think that number is high. So let's assume not 4 percent but 1. And not everybody gets infected so half of the population. Conservative according to health experts. So 1.6 million dead citizens. Still think 4 percent is good news?

Do the math: Out of a population of 1.38 billion Chinese, only
81,591 were infected. That's only 0.0059% of the total population that was infected.

The US population is 327.17 million people. At the same rate of infection, that would mean a total of 1,930303 will eventually be infected in the US. That would equate to 77,212 deaths overall in the US, if our model follows China, which I doubt.

Check my math, if you have any doubts.

I 'll take your math at face value. China tough locked down as in forbade it's citizens to leave the house. The US has not followed suit. By the way, the US already has a larger percentage of infected compared to total population as China. And there is absolutely no reason to assume that the rate of infection will slow down anytime soon.

 

[JGalt]

That is a recovery rate of nearly 90% and deaths of about 4%.

Now my point is why haven't we heard that from the MSM? Isn't that good news?
But I've not heard that from ANY of the 7/24 cable shows especially as they are certainly I would think be looking for "good news" for the public.
Why not?

ArcGIS Dashboards

ArcGIS Dashboards

www.arcgis.com

View attachment 314943

Of COURSE the lamestream media won't mention this. It would tone down our national hysteria, and we can't have THAT! We MUST keep blaming the Wu Flu on our president.....

IT ISN"T A FUCKING SECRET, FOR CHRISSAKE IT'S RIGHT THERE IN THE FUCKING TABLES.
BEEN THERE THE WHOLE TIME TOO.

Country, Other	Total Cases	New Cases	Total Deaths	New Deaths	Total Recovered	Active Cases	Serious, Critical	Tot Cases/ 1M pop	Tot Deaths/ 1M pop
China	81,218	+47	3,281	+4	73,650	4,287	1,399	56	2
Italy	69,176		6,820		8,326	54,030	3,393	1,144	113
USA	54,823		778		378	53,667	1,175	166	2
Spain	42,058		2,991		3,794	35,273	2,636	900	64
Germany	32,991		159		3,290	29,542	23	394	2
Iran	24,811		1,934		8,913	13,964		295	23
France	22,304		1,100		3,281	17,923	2,516	342	17
Switzerland	9,877		122		131	9,624	141	1,141	14
S. Korea	9,037		120		3,507	5,410	59	176	2
UK	8,077		422		135	7,520	20	119	6
Netherlands	5,560		276		2	5,282	435	324	16
Austria	5,283		28		9	5,246	22	587	3
Belgium	4,269		122		461	3,686	381	368	11
Norway	2,866		12		6	2,848	44	529	2
Canada	2,792		26		112	2,654	1	74	0.7
Portugal	2,362		33		22	2,307	48	232	3
Australia	2,317		8		118	2,191	11	91	0.3

Good GOD people wake the FUCK UP.

You wake the fuck up. There are 7.8 billion people in this world and only 417,663 global confirmed cases of coronavirus.

Do the math and tell me what the odds are of even catching it.

 

[JGalt]

That is a recovery rate of nearly 90% and deaths of about 4%.

Now my point is why haven't we heard that from the MSM? Isn't that good news?
But I've not heard that from ANY of the 7/24 cable shows especially as they are certainly I would think be looking for "good news" for the public.
Why not?

ArcGIS Dashboards

ArcGIS Dashboards

www.arcgis.com

View attachment 314943

4 percent? Four percent of the US population is about 12.6 million deaths. Don't think that's good news. I personally think that number is high. So let's assume not 4 percent but 1. And not everybody gets infected so half of the population. Conservative according to health experts. So 1.6 million dead citizens. Still think 4 percent is good news?

Do the math: Out of a population of 1.38 billion Chinese, only
81,591 were infected. That's only 0.0059% of the total population that was infected.

The US population is 327.17 million people. At the same rate of infection, that would mean a total of 1,930303 will eventually be infected in the US. That would equate to 77,212 deaths overall in the US, if our model follows China, which I doubt.

Check my math, if you have any doubts.

I 'll take your math at face value. China tough locked down as in forbade it's citizens to leave the house. The US has not followed suit. By the way, the US already has a larger percentage of infected compared to total population as China. And there is absolutely no reason to assume that the rate of infection will slow down anytime soon.

Untrue. China allowed people to leave the country, which infected every other country. So that's not much of a "lockdown."

 

[Pogo]

That is a recovery rate of nearly 90% and deaths of about 4%.

Now my point is why haven't we heard that from the MSM? Isn't that good news?
But I've not heard that from ANY of the 7/24 cable shows especially as they are certainly I would think be looking for "good news" for the public.
Why not?

ArcGIS Dashboards

ArcGIS Dashboards

www.arcgis.com

View attachment 314943

4 percent? Four percent of the US population is about 12.6 million deaths. Don't think that's good news. I personally think that number is high. So let's assume not 4 percent but 1. And not everybody gets infected so half of the population. Conservative according to health experts. So 1.6 million dead citizens. Still think 4 percent is good news?

Do the math: Out of a population of 1.38 billion Chinese, only
81,591 were infected. That's only 0.0059% of the total population that was infected.

The US population is 327.17 million people. At the same rate of infection, that would mean a total of 1,930303 will eventually be infected in the US. That would equate to 77,212 deaths overall in the US, if our model follows China, which I doubt.

Check my math, if you have any doubts.

I 'll take your math at face value. China tough locked down as in forbade it's citizens to leave the house. The US has not followed suit. By the way, the US already has a larger percentage of infected compared to total population as China. And there is absolutely no reason to assume that the rate of infection will slow down anytime soon.

Yep, currently 166 infections per 1M population, three times that of China. What's alarming about that is that, a week and a half ago that number was SIX. That's how fast it's running.

 

[Pogo]

Now my point is why haven't we heard that from the MSM? Isn't that good news?

No, that's called a strawman. You have NO, ZERO evidence that "we haven't heard" shit. You sticking your fingers in your ears and going LA LA LA is not the same as "we haven't heard".

 

[CowboyTed]

I have a thread on how this virus has been handled by South Korea and Europe...

US is growing very fast, 30%+ increase daily...

Lets see where COVID is going

Lads, Can we have a thread that doesn't mention one side or the other... Please keep the finger point out of it... This is how big is the hole and how bad will it get. First lets look at US Numbers right now. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_coronavirus_pandemic_in_the_United_States Lets...

www.usmessageboard.com

Sounth Korea have it down to 1% and I say they could break the back of it...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Has the MSM told you that of China's 81,591 case.. 73,280 recovered or almost 90% recovery..

If you believe any of the numbers coming out of China, you may be as dumb as AOC.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Has the MSM told you that of China's 81,591 case.. 73,280 recovered or almost 90% recovery..

If you believe any of the numbers coming out of China, you may be as dumb as AOC.

And that means you're smarter than trump.

And way smarter than you.......

We both know that's not true.

Everybody knows that's true. Way, way smarter than you.

 

[healthmyths]

Now my point is why haven't we heard that from the MSM? Isn't that good news?

No, that's called a strawman. You have NO, ZERO evidence that "we haven't heard" shit. You sticking your fingers in your ears and going LA LA LA is not the same as "we haven't heard".

And you are the idiot that like the MSM uses a truncated video of the...
First Lady of Poland didn’t Snub Donald Trump’s handshake, Guardian Corrects

That's what the MSM is doing regarding the China virus!

 

[JGalt]

Now my point is why haven't we heard that from the MSM? Isn't that good news?

No, that's called a strawman. You have NO, ZERO evidence that "we haven't heard" shit. You sticking your fingers in your ears and going LA LA LA is not the same as "we haven't heard".

And you are the idiot that like the MSM uses a truncated video of the...
First Lady of Poland didn’t Snub Donald Trump’s handshake, Guardian Corrects
View attachment 315035

That's what the MSM is doing regarding the China virus!

That's called "lying". Secular progressive leftards are good at that.