Has Pam Bondi entered the conversation for most corrupt AG in just 6 months?

Garland was just all around a horrible at his job....thankfully the Senate was wise enough not to confirm him to the SCOTUS.
He would have made a very good Justice (sadly he was an over cautious AG) and the Senate never voted on his nomination

Add that to the long list of shit you either lied about or are too stupid to report accurately
 
It's a memo about surveillance, you ******* tard.
It’s a memo about concerns from radical catholic traditionalists as demonstrated by Xavier Lopez. It doesn’t say they have innocent Catholics under surveillance. You made that shit up.
 
He would have made a very good Justice (sadly he was an over cautious AG) and the Senate never voted on his nomination

Add that to the long list of shit you either lied about or are too stupid to report accurately
Correct, they adviced against it. He was a horrible AG, I agree with you, if he can't do that job right, he couldn't of handled the bench. You should have listened to the Senate's advice the first time, but you didn't.
 
I never lie... you just have a wide definition of what a lie is....
To you everything a MAGA says is a lie because you are dense and uneducated....
What’s the excuse for getting it wrong then?
 
It’s a memo about concerns from radical catholic traditionalists as demonstrated by Xavier Lopez. It doesn’t say they have innocent Catholics under surveillance. You made that shit up.
Xavier Lopez was not a Catholic, he joined some National Socialist nutjobs that broke away from the Catholic church.
 
It’s a memo about concerns from radical catholic traditionalists as demonstrated by Xavier Lopez. It doesn’t say they have innocent Catholics under surveillance. You made that shit up.

it was telling them to keep an eye on Traditional Catholics because they were Traditional Catholics.

Stop trying to justify it because you hate Traditional Catholics.
 
Correct, they adviced against it. He was a horrible AG, I agree with you, if he can't do that job right, he couldn't have handled the bench. You should have listened to the Senate's advice the first time, but you didn't.
“Adviced against it”? Not sure what that even means but his nomination was BLOCKED. There was never a vote

Wrong. The nomination
 
15th post
it was telling them to keep an eye on Traditional Catholics because they were Traditional Catholics.

Stop trying to justify it because you hate Traditional Catholics.
Telling them to be aware that there are radical violent Catholics out there.

BECAUSE THERE ARE.

Sorry that facts hurt your feelings. Violent people are investigated even if they’re catholic.
 
“Adviced against it”? Not sure what that even means but his nomination was BLOCKED. There was never a vote

Wrong. The nomination
There doesn't have to be a vote. The Constitution says the Senate has to advice and then give consent.

The advice was not him. You should of listened, he was a horrible pick, as proof from his time as one of the worst AGs in American history
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom