Has Pam Bondi entered the conversation for most corrupt AG in just 6 months?

[Marener]

they lied about what? if the story is untrue, then they didn't lie, hitlery and the obammy three did.

Papadopolous lied about when he talked to a Russian asset.
Stone lied about communication with Wikileaks.
Flynn lied about communication with the Russian ambassador.

All proven in court. No one made them lie. They chose to do so.

 

[jc456]

But that didn’t actually happen. The intelligence agencies didn’t say anything about Trump in the January 2017 ICA.

you fking have no clue as to what went on. ZERO. you're just a demofk ass licker with shit hanging off your chin.

 

[Marener]

you fking have no clue as to what went on. ZERO. you're just a demofk ass licker with shit hanging off your chin.

Did you read the ICA? Tell us how it smeared Trump.

 

[jc456]

Papadopolous lied about when he talked to a Russian asset.

nope

Stone lied about communication with Wikileaks.

nope

Flynn lied about communication with the Russian ambassador.

nope

All proven in court. No one made them lie. They chose to do so.

They all did plea deals because of threats to family. that's why, sue baby sue, disco inferno!!!!
no

 

[jc456]

Did you read the ICA? Tell us how it smeared Trump.

it's all made up shit that will be discussed in the grand jury. Don't worry, if there's no there there, then why are you moaning?

 

[jc456]

Why wasn’t anyone else prosecuted for it? Just one lawyer.

that's the purpose of the grand jury dumb fker.

 

[jc456]

But that didn’t actually happen. The intelligence agencies didn’t say anything about Trump in the January 2017 ICA.

The Committee finds the difference in confidence levels between the NSA and the CIA and FBI on the assessment that “Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances” appropriately represents analytic differences and was reached in a professional and transparent manner.

 

[Rawley]

Why wasn’t anyone else prosecuted for it? Just one lawyer.

because Durham was/is a stooge.

 

[jc456]

because Durham was/is a stooge.

and he wasn't asked to check out obammy's role. Since, all of the files classified and held by obammy.

 

[Marener]

because Durham was/is a stooge.

Were you in a meeting with him and Biden too?

 

[Marener]

The Committee finds the difference in confidence levels between the NSA and the CIA and FBI on the assessment that “Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances” appropriately represents analytic differences and was reached in a professional and transparent manner.

Thanks. Wherever you got this information, it confirms there’s no scandal.

 

[jc456]

The Committee finds the difference in confidence levels between the NSA and the CIA and FBI on the assessment that “Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances” appropriately represents analytic differences and was reached in a professional and transparent manner.

BTW, the one thing that was true was that there was no evidence that any vote was changed or eliminated by russia. They at least told that truth. So, you stepped into quicksand to say that they interfered. can't interfere if no vote was touched ever.

 

[Marener]

that's the purpose of the grand jury dumb fker.

Durham had a grand jury, dumb ******.

 

[jc456]

Thanks. Wherever you got this information, it confirms there’s no scandal.

it's where the scandal started. they used that for the FISA warrants asshole. Hey, were any votes touched by russia?

 

[jc456]

Durham had a grand jury, dumb ******.

and none of the documents that Gabbard released were used, dumbass. DOH!

 

[Seymour Flops]

But that didn’t actually happen. The intelligence agencies didn’t say anything about Trump in the January 2017 ICA.

Taking your word for that.The intelligence community assessment is one document. The fact that they didn't mention trump in one iteration of that document only proves that they didn't mention trump in that particular version.

At question is more what Obama said to the intelligence agencies. Did he order them to rewrite the assessment to include trump? The evidence that we have now appears to show that he did.

If so, did the intelligence agencies refuse such a blatant weaponization of their work? If so, Clapper and Brennan will surely testify to that as soon as they stop taking the fifth.

Democrats' habit of keeping classified documents for their own use, even after leaving public service will pay off in that case. They will be able to prove their innocence by showing copies up their
communication to the president, letting him know that they would not be his hatchet men gainst incoming president Trump.

Keep in mind that I am not trying to prejudge this case, or I should say these cases. All I want is a full, honest and transparent investigation of each allegation. I get the impression that you are resistant to that. If so, why?

If Brennan or Clapper proves their innocence by the method above, I would even support President Trump awarding them the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

If . . .

 

[Rawley]

Were you in a meeting with him and Biden too?

You tell me, you pretend to know everything

 

[jc456]

Were you in a meeting with him and Biden too?

were you? you fking act like you were.

 

[Marener]

it's where the scandal started. they used that for the FISA warrants asshole. Hey, were any votes touched by russia?

As your quote stated, there’s nothing wrong with the ICA.

When were the FISA warrants issued? Do you know?

 

[jc456]

As your quote stated, there’s nothing wrong with the ICA.

When were the FISA warrants issued? Do you know?

not long after, Carter Page was first I believe. warrant illegal