jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 158,815
- 39,255
- 2,180
It doesn't matter, it's what was done afterward. Still no votes were touched right? Why did they need a report with anything but that?Does it accuse Trump of anything?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It doesn't matter, it's what was done afterward. Still no votes were touched right? Why did they need a report with anything but that?Does it accuse Trump of anything?
how does it work explain how not touching ballots changes ballots?Seriously? Are you really that ignorant?
It's what spawned falsely procured FISA warrants, investigations of several that would have never happened if the 'cooked' intel and conspiracy between WH, CIA and FBI never happened.You continue to believe that fairy tale. That document had nothing to do with any of those convictions.
You claimed he wasn't mentioned......did you lie?Does it accuse Trump of anything?
But it didn’t. The investigations and FISA warrants predate the ICA.It's what spawned falsely procured FISA warrants, investigations of several that would have never happened if the 'cooked' intel and conspiracy between WH, CIA and FBI never happened.
nope, first FISA warrant for Page in October was evidence to get Trump!!! Page worked for Trump's campaign. fk I hate stupid.You continue to believe that fairy tale. That document had nothing to do with any of those convictions.
Don’t be pedantic. The ICA doesn’t smear Trump because it doesn’t accuse him of anything.You claimed he wasn't mentioned......did you lie?
sure it did, you will find out in the new grand jury trial. heheBut it didn’t. The investigations and FISA warrants predate the ICA.
it's what demofks do, they play with themselves.Don’t be pedantic. The ICA doesn’t smear Trump because it doesn’t accuse him of anything.
"Influence"how does it work explain how not touching ballots changes ballots?
You have a problem with cause and effect.sure it did, you will find out in the new grand jury trial. hehe
Simple. He failed in his mission to find dirt on the Obama admin concerning the Russia investigation. IOW, he reported on the facts the investigation revealed. trumples hate that.What is your basis to label Durham a “stooge”?
So you admit you lied then.Don’t be pedantic. The ICA doesn’t smear Trump because it doesn’t accuse him of anything.
I was incompletely precise. I assumed you understood what I was talking about based on contextSo you admit you lied then.
influence like what? Are you suggesting that people can't think for themselves?"Influence"
the capacity to have an effect on the character, development, or behavior of someone or something, or the effect itself.
Sorry, I was unaware that English is not your first language.
And that's what Obama did with the cooked intel after the November election.The investigations and FISA warrants predate the ICA.
LiarI was incompletely precise. I assumed you understood what I was talking about based on context
DNI Gabbard sure as hell didn't.Simple. He failed in his mission to find dirt on the Obama admin concerning the Russia investigation. IOW, he reported on the facts the investigation revealed. trumples hate that.
again, that mthr fkr thinks he knows more than Gabbard. Ask him. He'll say what she has is nothing. It's fking amazing to me the paperwork these fkers get.And that's what Obama did with the cooked intel after the November election.
Liar
That's the same horseshit you play on myself and other posters......so you're on record not liking it?
DNI Gabbard sure as hell didn't.
Why yes, some people can't. Are you surprised?Are you suggesting that people can't think for themselves?
Only one conviction out of the whole Russia hoax.What is your basis to label Durham a “stooge”?
No, Carter Page's first FISA warrant was in 2014.not long after, Carter Page was first I believe. warrant illegal