Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,099
- 245
You sound like you are working for Satan. Again you can't just looks at things thousands of years ago that way. And you can't be hypocritical of morals as well. Because you aren't Showing morals or maturity at all. No one will have a discussion if you aren't trying to discuss besides stating your opinion over and over again.
Thousands of years ago? It was 1600 years ago, and that does not make Mohammad breaking his vow to let Christians live in peace any less reprehensible than it would if he did it today. It is rather petty of you to call me immature because my morals are based on a man keeping his word, while yours are based on justifying a scum sucking piece of shit.
That's all your opinion. Like I said. And Muslims were the only faith who allowed any other religon to be practiced freely. Christian didn't let Muslims or Jews practice their faith. Neither did Jews. Only Muslims allowed other faiths. Your argument is horrible. Umar ibn khattab allowed it a lot
Nothing I said is just my opinion.
Muslims are followers of Islam, which is the faith. You are correct that Muslims are quite willing to let other religions live in dhimmitude. Personally, I wouldn't call that peace, but I have a strange fixation on freedom. You are however, wrong that they were the only ones that allow other faiths to practice their faith. If it actually worked that way there would be no mosques in Israel or the US.