Harris / Trump Election Polls

[JohnDB]

Funny how the polls suddenly matter now….

In the last polls before the election they have to try and "fix them" to gain some semblance of accuracy....they aren't though and you can't fix them enough to make them legit without showing how much a fraud you were earlier.

So....if Harris is up by 4 on Sienna that means she is behind by 4....because Sienna is usually off by 8.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

 

[jbander]

So selective Taz, what gives?

What a hoot , this is a crypto currency investment organization. Betting on crypto , it is not a poll at all , To boot they put their own values on everything. Like saying illegal border crossing is worth 10 points and Harris beating Trump in 536 poll which it does, only worth 1 point. You can make anything mean anything you want with you setting values on everything and also selecting all aspect which holds credence to the position you want effected. Meaning, that as example, saying the border numbers should be part of this study but showing that Harris wins on any poll not even being in the study. You are a clown. ,

 

[jbander]

In the last polls before the election they have to try and "fix them" to gain some semblance of accuracy....they aren't though and you can't fix them enough to make them legit without showing how much a fraud you were earlier.

So....if Harris is up by 4 on Sienna that means she is behind by 4....because Sienna is usually off by 8.

There is no record through the years Of Sienna polls being off by 8. One year means shit you idiot.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

This total bologna was well debunked by the intrepid People's Pundit.

 

[JohnDB]

There is no record through the years Of Sienna polls being off by 8. One year means shit you idiot.

The thing about the internet is that it never really forgets anything.

 

[JohnDB]

 

[jbander]

The thing about the internet is that it never really forgets anything.

So it verifies you are a bullshitter , is that your point. You are a joke.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

 

[SweetSue92]

In the last polls before the election they have to try and "fix them" to gain some semblance of accuracy....they aren't though and you can't fix them enough to make them legit without showing how much a fraud you were earlier.

So....if Harris is up by 4 on Sienna that means she is behind by 4....because Sienna is usually off by 8.

Exactly this. Skewed pollsters figure they can massage to influence until about a week/ten days before, when it's save the credibility time. We're getting pretty close to that window

 

[SweetSue92]

From my MI neighborhood/community:

Still not a single Harris sign in the neighborhood.

About three Harris signs on my regular routes. I would say the Trump to Harris ratio is about 4-1.

Yesterday some guy on a bike at a busy intersection waving a huge Trump flag to passing traffic. I have never seen that before in my community--not from a car or truck, or a sign in a yard, but some guy standing out on a chilly October night in MI waving a candidate's flag.

 

[Lisa558]

From my MI neighborhood/community:

Still not a single Harris sign in the neighborhood.

About three Harris signs on my regular routes. I would say the Trump to Harris ratio is about 4-1.

Yesterday some guy on a bike at a busy intersection waving a huge Trump flag to passing traffic. I have never seen that before in my community--not from a car or truck, or a sign in a yard, but some guy standing out on a chilly October night in MI waving a candidate's flag.

And I am in a DC suburb - which always goes overwhelmingly for the Democrat. In my neighborhood, the signs are 50/50.

 

[braalian]

From my MI neighborhood/community:

Still not a single Harris sign in the neighborhood.

About three Harris signs on my regular routes. I would say the Trump to Harris ratio is about 4-1.

Yesterday some guy on a bike at a busy intersection waving a huge Trump flag to passing traffic. I have never seen that before in my community--not from a car or truck, or a sign in a yard, but some guy standing out on a chilly October night in MI waving a candidate's flag.

Gee, I guess that means that if Harris wins Michigan the only possible explanation is massive voter fraud, right?

I mean, you say you’re seeing more Trump signs than Harris ones. What more scientific proof do you need?

 

[Lisa558]

Exactly this. Skewed pollsters figure they can massage to influence until about a week/ten days before, when it's save the credibility time. We're getting pretty close to that window

Except….do they want to save their credibility, or keep it appearing as if it’s close because they know the Dems plan to cheat massively to get her over the finish line, and thus a real poll would make the cheating obvious?

 

[jbander]

These right wing traitors who choose dictatorship over democracy have to be put in their place, They are this countries biggest threat and enemy. And should be treated as such, There has never been a threat to our democracy at this level in the history of this country, Don't agree tells us a bigger threat to democracy then MAGA.

 

[percysunshine]

The betting markets are an interesting look. People put their money on a candidate, not just an opinion or a model assumption.

The trouble is, there is no distinction for the size of the win. It is just a on/off switch vote. A landslide is the same as a 1 point squeeker.

They should handicap the contest and give a point spread. Say Kamala +15 electoral votes or something.

 

[SweetSue92]

And I am in a DC suburb - which always goes overwhelmingly for the Democrat. In my neighborhood, the signs are 50/50.

Now THAT is surprising--in a great way!

 

[RhodyPatriot]

Gee, I guess that means that if Harris wins Michigan

You just have no idea what's coming, huh?

Sad.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

The betting markets are an interesting look. People put their money on a candidate, not just an opinion or a model assumption.

The trouble is, there is no distinction for the size of the win. It is just a on/off switch vote. A landslide is the same as a 1 point squeeker.

They should handicap the contest and give a point spread. Say Kamala +15 electoral votes or something.

Sure.

If they wanna lose their dough.

 

[SweetSue92]

Gee, I guess that means that if Harris wins Michigan the only possible explanation is massive voter fraud, right?

I mean, you say you’re seeing more Trump signs than Harris ones. What more scientific proof do you need?

Never claimed it was scientific proof. Didn't I say it was anecdotal?

I think Trump has a slightly better chance of winning here, yes. we will see soon enough