Harris / Trump Election Polls

[SweetSue92]

Almost two weeks later and still nothing from Dont Taz Me Bro on the defunct polls he kept posting?

huh

 

[para bellum]

Matt Taibbi did a piece on the suppression of accurate polling this election.

How America's Accurate Election Polls Were Covered Up​

The Real Clear Politics National Average was removed by Wikipedia before the election and the New York Times denounced its failure to skew data. A solution to the "mystery" of crappy polling?​

How America's Accurate Election Polls Were Covered Up

The Real Clear Politics National Average was removed by Wikipedia before the election and the New York Times denounced its failure to skew data. A solution to the "mystery" of crappy polling?

www.racket.news

 

[SweetSue92]

And now we discover that Kamala's internals NEVER--and I repeat--NEVER, showed her ahead of Trump.

You all just keep losing. No one deserves it more.

 

[Esoteric Inkling]

 

[HeyNorm]

And now we discover that Kamala's internals NEVER--and I repeat--NEVER, showed her ahead of Trump.

You all just keep losing. No one deserves it more.

Most pollsters understand that democrats bank far more surplus votes in blue states than republicans do in red states, thus making it necessary for the democrat to be ahead by 4 to 4.5 percent to win the electoral college.

That’s why 538 disappointed me so much with their 50/50 chance of trump winning.

They had to see she was no where close to that margin. Trump was nearly a lock to win.

 

[JohnDB]

As people kept knocking Rasmussen polling for being too right leaning....what appears to be true is that they were just more consistently accurate than the others quoted more often.

That's several presidential elections in a row Rasmussen has been the most accurate.

Q: Anybody wanna argue?
A: Not until four years from now.

 

[Esoteric Inkling]

Gee, I guess that means that if Harris wins Michigan the only possible explanation is massive voter fraud, right?

I mean, you say you’re seeing more Trump signs than Harris ones. What more scientific proof do you need?

 

[westwall]

View attachment 1036770

Good sign for the VP (and America).

WHOOPSIE!

 

[Esoteric Inkling]

Harris is closing

HAHAHHAA

 

[Mister Iggy]

The poll I posted on page 1, was spot on with the electoral college results. Its was obvious he would win all the swing states.

 

[Meathead]

Exactly.....Trump 312 the ho 226

Spot on call!

 

[SweetSue92]

Almost two weeks later and still nothing from Dont Taz Me Bro on the defunct polls he kept posting?

huh

December 1st, still nothing?

Ah well, Politico tries to save face:

Loading…

www.politico.com

 

[Foxfyre]

View attachment 1047640

As people kept knocking Rasmussen polling for being too right leaning....what appears to be true is that they were just more consistently accurate than the others quoted more often.

That's several presidential elections in a row Rasmussen has been the most accurate.

Q: Anybody wanna argue?
A: Not until four years from now.

And Rasmussen took a well deserved bow after the election results were in too. The left hates Rasmussen for some reason even though they give Joe Biden some of his highest approval ratings. But they also poll on the kitchen table issues that most Americans care about too and the left really REALLY doesn't like that. But if you want to know what's working and what isn't in public policy, checking in on Rasmussen several times a week is a good way to get a general idea.

 

[westwall]

And Rasmussen took a well deserved bow after the election results were in too. The left hates Rasmussen for some reason even though they give Joe Biden some of his highest approval ratings. But they also poll on the kitchen table issues that most Americans care about too and the left really REALLY doesn't like that. But if you want to know what's working and what isn't in public policy, checking in on Rasmussen several times a week is a good way to get a general idea.

Atlasintel was I think even more accurate than Rasmussen.

 

[Mister Iggy]

December 1st, still nothing?

Ah well, Politico tries to save face:

Loading…

www.politico.com

Those polls will never be trusted again, total propaganda.

 

[JohnDB]

Those polls will never be trusted again, total propaganda.

Until the next election....then they will be quoted as if they were the most accurate pollsters ever....

 

[SweetSue92]

Until the next election....then they will be quoted as if they were the most accurate pollsters ever....

Like that moonbat Ann Selzer. Hey, she was only off by a mere....15 points

 

[westwall]

Like that moonbat Ann Selzer. Hey, she was only off by a mere....15 points

I think it ended up being 16 points!

 

[Esoteric Inkling]

Like that moonbat Ann Selzer. Hey, she was only off by a mere....15 points

Yes, that was almost certainly sheer propaganda and utterly purposeful.

You don't go from being one of the most accurate polls in the nation to being off by double digits in a single bound, unless you're hiding something.

What a tool.