Harmeet Dhillon: “We found at least 350,000 dead people currently on voter rolls.”




No wonder the Democrats want to hide the voting rolls. How many more dead people are on the roles and did they
"vote" after they died?



That's nothing. They only have access to the "cleaner"cooperative States. 29 other states refused. 21 of those are completely corrupted. Not just DEAD names but need to remove invalid names. Tens of millions not 350K.

But, it's a good start to build the methodology. Thank you.
 
Do you have any proof that these "dead" people are voting?
You have to many idiots in office. That is proof right there. Over the years yiu have taken over red states y design and even empowered those Progs elected to higher control as to reinforce your dictatorial leanings. Arizona, New Mexico, Nevada, California, Colorado, Washington State, Oregon, etc. as examples.
 
As was already pointed out....that's not a source.

This is from your link on the Heritage Foundation:

Claims that the database contains almost 1,100 proven instances of voter fraud are grossly exaggerated and devoid of context, according to Heritage Fraud Database: An Assessment. It confirms what numerous studies have consistently shown: Voter fraud is vanishingly rare, and impersonating a voter at the polls is less common a phenomenon than being struck by lightning.

“The database includes an assortment of cases, many unrelated or tangentially related, going back decades, with only a handful pertaining to non-citizens voting or impersonation at the polls,” writes the author. “They add up to a molecular fraction of the total votes cast nationwide. Inadvertently, the Heritage Foundation’s database undermines its claim of widespread voter fraud.

**********************

Which clearly indicates that there are instances where voter fraud has occurred. Just not at the rate the Heritage Foundation claims.

It's interesting they don't give actual numbers. Given the number of votes at the poll and the instances of being struck by lightning, I can see why they might use this to hide what could be substantial numbers. Why not just provide them? I know, I know.....I can ask them. Because you won't. You'll just take it at face value.

happens and are caught. You can find someone violating any law.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
Another person lying to keep a job.
 
IOW, you have no source.


They considered recounting the falsified tabulator tapes in Fulton an audit. Or recounting 350,000 invalid mail ballots in PHX an Auidt? Doing sig review audit in Cobb county when Fulton skipped the SIG review. BoardStain regurgitate the BS like dogs throwing up.
 
happens and are caught. You can find someone violating any law.
Caught nothing...As I said, Heritage has sold their soul like CATO did...They're no more reliable a source than anyone else on the corporatist "right".

Show us the INDEPENDENTLY OPERATED AND VERIFIED forensic audits of the voter rolls, the poll books, and the envelopes for the sleazy mail-in ballots.

Oh wait, those are the audits that fruitcakes like you fight to the death to prevent from ever occurring...I remember now.
 
Caught nothing...As I said, Heritage has sold their soul like CATO did...They're no more reliable a source than anyone else on the corporatist "right".

Show us the INDEPENDENTLY OPERATED AND VERIFIED forensic audits of the voter rolls, the poll books, and the envelopes for the sleazy mail-in ballots.

Oh wait, those are the audits that fruitcakes like you fight to the death to prevent from ever occurring...I remember now.

LOL, yeah, no one can find cheating but dang, you know it's there on some massive level.


Ooooooommmmmmm.
 



No wonder the Democrats want to hide the voting rolls. How many more dead people are on the roles and did they
"vote" after they died?

The saying remains, my parents voted for republicans their entire lives, now that they're dead they vote democrat.
 
LOL, yeah, no one can find cheating but dang, you know it's there on some massive level.


Ooooooommmmmmm.
Your own rebuttal showed it occurs. Just not at the level claimed by Heritage (or so they say....they use comparisons that don't tell you anything).

Are you really that bent on being a liar?
 
15th post
You understand. A very, very, very small number and are generally caught.

Might one out of 20 million votes be bogus? Maybe.
How'd you come up with that number?

You seem to play pretty fast and loose with the truth.

Let's see it.
 
There have been audits........
Yes, there have been.

But nothing comprehensive.

Overall statistical analysis shows that in some cases there are races worth doing detailed audits.

But the left does not seem to like those when their person is winning.
 
How'd you come up with that number?

You seem to play pretty fast and loose with the truth.

Let's see it.

The Heritage Foundation for one.

Lawsuit after lawsuit, audit after audit, investigation after investigation for another.
 



No wonder the Democrats want to hide the voting rolls. How many more dead people are on the roles and did they
"vote" after they died?

There is nothing to say that the dead people voted.

It's a concern because of it's potential
 
Back
Top Bottom