Hamas Threatens Another Attack

[toastman]

Hamas is looking for pity from the world community.


The only option Hamas faces, therefore, is to attack Israel again as a way of ridding itself of the severe crisis in the Gaza Strip and the growing frustration among the Palestinians living there. Hamas’s biggest fear is that this frustration will be translated into disillusionment with its regime. That is why Hamas is now seeking to direct the anger on the Palestinian street toward Israel.

Hamas is also hoping that another war will further increase anti-Israel sentiment around the world and earn the Palestinians even more sympathy.

Hamas’s threats should be taken seriously.


Hamas Rebuild Gaza or We Will Attack Israel- Israel News

Israel and everyone else has already violated the ceasefire. So it is not like Hamas would be starting something.

Well if they do attack Israel, don't start whining when Israel hits back ten times harder

Indeed, Israel will bomb the crap out of civilians again.

Hamas will attack civilians, but when Israel retaliates, you guys will cry.

Israel does not have any "civilians." You should know that already.

Yes they do. We've been through this already. That quote you posted does not apply to Israel, it applies to occupied territories . You were wrong about that, like you're wrong about 99% of the stuff you post

 

[P F Tinmore]

Israel and everyone else has already violated the ceasefire. So it is not like Hamas would be starting something.

Well if they do attack Israel, don't start whining when Israel hits back ten times harder

Indeed, Israel will bomb the crap out of civilians again.

Hamas will attack civilians, but when Israel retaliates, you guys will cry.

Israel does not have any "civilians." You should know that already.

Yes they do. We've been through this already. That quote you posted does not apply to Israel, it applies to occupied territories . You were wrong about that, like you're wrong about 99% of the stuff you post

You were mistaken.

 

[toastman]

Well if they do attack Israel, don't start whining when Israel hits back ten times harder

Indeed, Israel will bomb the crap out of civilians again.

Hamas will attack civilians, but when Israel retaliates, you guys will cry.

Israel does not have any "civilians." You should know that already.

Yes they do. We've been through this already. That quote you posted does not apply to Israel, it applies to occupied territories . You were wrong about that, like you're wrong about 99% of the stuff you post

You were mistaken.

No, you are mistaken. Your link never even said it applies to Israel. You just found the quote and pretended it did. It has nothing to do with Israel.

 

[Vigilante]

 

[P F Tinmore]

Indeed, Israel will bomb the crap out of civilians again.

Hamas will attack civilians, but when Israel retaliates, you guys will cry.

Israel does not have any "civilians." You should know that already.

Yes they do. We've been through this already. That quote you posted does not apply to Israel, it applies to occupied territories . You were wrong about that, like you're wrong about 99% of the stuff you post

You were mistaken.

No, you are mistaken. Your link never even said it applies to Israel. You just found the quote and pretended it did. It has nothing to do with Israel.

You drew your conclusion without researching the facts.

 

[toastman]

Hamas will attack civilians, but when Israel retaliates, you guys will cry.

Israel does not have any "civilians." You should know that already.

Yes they do. We've been through this already. That quote you posted does not apply to Israel, it applies to occupied territories . You were wrong about that, like you're wrong about 99% of the stuff you post

You were mistaken.

No, you are mistaken. Your link never even said it applies to Israel. You just found the quote and pretended it did. It has nothing to do with Israel.

You drew your conclusion without researching the facts.

What facts ? The quote clearly said it applies to occupations. What's there to research.

 

[Hossfly]

Hamas is looking for pity from the world community.


The only option Hamas faces, therefore, is to attack Israel again as a way of ridding itself of the severe crisis in the Gaza Strip and the growing frustration among the Palestinians living there. Hamas’s biggest fear is that this frustration will be translated into disillusionment with its regime. That is why Hamas is now seeking to direct the anger on the Palestinian street toward Israel.

Hamas is also hoping that another war will further increase anti-Israel sentiment around the world and earn the Palestinians even more sympathy.

Hamas’s threats should be taken seriously.


Hamas Rebuild Gaza or We Will Attack Israel- Israel News

Israel and everyone else has already violated the ceasefire. So it is not like Hamas would be starting something.

Say what! Hamas has threatened to attack Israel if Gaza is not rebuilt. Then they turn around and reject a UN plan to rebuild Gaza because Israel would be in charge of rebuilding. Well, why not Israel? Because Hamas would take the reconstruction money and buy war materials and villas in Qatar. Typical Palestinian mentality outsmarts itself again.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Israel does not have any "civilians." You should know that already.

Yes they do. We've been through this already. That quote you posted does not apply to Israel, it applies to occupied territories . You were wrong about that, like you're wrong about 99% of the stuff you post

You were mistaken.

No, you are mistaken. Your link never even said it applies to Israel. You just found the quote and pretended it did. It has nothing to do with Israel.

You drew your conclusion without researching the facts.

What facts ? The quote clearly said it applies to occupations. What's there to research.

 

[toastman]

Yes they do. We've been through this already. That quote you posted does not apply to Israel, it applies to occupied territories . You were wrong about that, like you're wrong about 99% of the stuff you post

You were mistaken.

No, you are mistaken. Your link never even said it applies to Israel. You just found the quote and pretended it did. It has nothing to do with Israel.

You drew your conclusion without researching the facts.

What facts ? The quote clearly said it applies to occupations. What's there to research.

I call your and raise you a

 

[P F Tinmore]

You were mistaken.

No, you are mistaken. Your link never even said it applies to Israel. You just found the quote and pretended it did. It has nothing to do with Israel.

You drew your conclusion without researching the facts.

What facts ? The quote clearly said it applies to occupations. What's there to research.

I call your and raise you a

Indeed, you have never researched to prove your premise to be true.

That is pretty sloppy work.

 

[Hossfly]

No, you are mistaken. Your link never even said it applies to Israel. You just found the quote and pretended it did. It has nothing to do with Israel.

You drew your conclusion without researching the facts.

What facts ? The quote clearly said it applies to occupations. What's there to research.

I call your and raise you a

Indeed, you have never researched to prove your premise to be true.

That is pretty sloppy work.

The sloppy work, Mr. Tinmore, is the way you take the coulda, woulda and shoulda, weave it into a web of fantasy, add some discarded proclamations and outdated laws and procedures. Then you believe all that foofaraw like a grownup who still believes in the Easter Claus. Pathetic.

 

[RoccoR]

P F Tinmore, et al,

You know very well that this has been all linked to you before.

No, you are mistaken. Your link never even said it applies to Israel. You just found the quote and pretended it did. It has nothing to do with Israel.

You drew your conclusion without researching the facts.

What facts ? The quote clearly said it applies to occupations. What's there to research.

I call your and raise you a

Indeed, you have never researched to prove your premise to be true.

That is pretty sloppy work.

(COMMENT)

Your attempt to confuse the issue is merely an attempt to justify unlawful activity on the part of the Palestinians.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

You drew your conclusion without researching the facts.

What facts ? The quote clearly said it applies to occupations. What's there to research.

I call your and raise you a

Indeed, you have never researched to prove your premise to be true.

That is pretty sloppy work.

The sloppy work, Mr. Tinmore, is the way you take the coulda, woulda and shoulda, weave it into a web of fantasy, add some discarded proclamations and outdated laws and procedures. Then you believe all that foofaraw like a grownup who still believes in the Easter Claus. Pathetic.

What have I quoted that has an expiration date?

 

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, et al,

You know very well that this has been all linked to you before.

You drew your conclusion without researching the facts.

What facts ? The quote clearly said it applies to occupations. What's there to research.

I call your and raise you a

Indeed, you have never researched to prove your premise to be true.

That is pretty sloppy work.

(COMMENT)

Your attempt to confuse the issue is merely an attempt to justify unlawful activity on the part of the Palestinians.

Most Respectfully,
R

Are you saying that what I posted is false?

 

[toastman]

P F Tinmore, et al,

You know very well that this has been all linked to you before.

What facts ? The quote clearly said it applies to occupations. What's there to research.

I call your and raise you a

Indeed, you have never researched to prove your premise to be true.

That is pretty sloppy work.

(COMMENT)

Your attempt to confuse the issue is merely an attempt to justify unlawful activity on the part of the Palestinians.

Most Respectfully,
R

Are you saying that what I posted is false?

No shit !

 

[Hossfly]

What facts ? The quote clearly said it applies to occupations. What's there to research.

I call your and raise you a

Indeed, you have never researched to prove your premise to be true.

That is pretty sloppy work.

The sloppy work, Mr. Tinmore, is the way you take the coulda, woulda and shoulda, weave it into a web of fantasy, add some discarded proclamations and outdated laws and procedures. Then you believe all that foofaraw like a grownup who still believes in the Easter Claus. Pathetic.

What have I quoted that has an expiration date?

Lots of LON proclamations and pronouncements.

 

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, et al,

You know very well that this has been all linked to you before.

I call your and raise you a

Indeed, you have never researched to prove your premise to be true.

That is pretty sloppy work.

(COMMENT)

Your attempt to confuse the issue is merely an attempt to justify unlawful activity on the part of the Palestinians.

Most Respectfully,
R

Are you saying that what I posted is false?

No shit !

Are you implying that you have researched your premise?

Could you share that research with us?

 

[P F Tinmore]

I call your and raise you a

Indeed, you have never researched to prove your premise to be true.

That is pretty sloppy work.

The sloppy work, Mr. Tinmore, is the way you take the coulda, woulda and shoulda, weave it into a web of fantasy, add some discarded proclamations and outdated laws and procedures. Then you believe all that foofaraw like a grownup who still believes in the Easter Claus. Pathetic.

What have I quoted that has an expiration date?

Lots of LON proclamations and pronouncements.

Could you quote some passages?

 

[teddyearp]

Israel caused the crisis in Gaza, while we all sat and watched on TV.

And we all know that they can't put anything on the TV that isn't true, right?

 

[teddyearp]

I find it funny those boys went missing as well when they had just discussed the situation a few weeks earlier in the government. They knew the 3 boys were dead before they invaded Gaza, and the fact is, WHO really killed those boys, the timing of everything is very suspicious, so quit the fabrication.

Speaking of fabrication . . . . . you have just led us into the "Twilight Zone" . . . .