Hamas Didn't Carry Our the Massacre --Israel Did

[Lisa558]

Of course they think it is funny, and to rub it on, they will tell you that there isn't anything antisemitic about, too.

The gaslighting is part and parcel of their Jew hatred. I have seed hundreds over the years and almost all of them have the same m.o.

It’s unbelievable how quickly leftists laugh at incidents of Jew-hate wile simultaneously railing against bigotry toward blacks or Muslims.

They KNOW it’s antisemitic. It’s just that they enjoy angering Jews by denying the obvious.

 

[irosie91]

Agreed.

I went to a source that posted news and information from a Palestinian PoV.

And then I get attacked with an Ad hominem fallacy?

FML.

You just can't win here.

Folks don't want to have a discussion in good faith, AT ALL.

I avoid quoting or citing information from INTEREST GROUPS no matter
how reliable I judge them to be. An example---I consider Robert Spencer
to be a very balanced scholar but NEVER cite his articles because he
discusses the issues from the standpoint of a person with a FAMILY
LEGACY of islamic oppression

 

[surada]

This is what Hamas' wants you to believe.

How many of you openly agree?

How many will take the cowards route and say "we can't know for sure"?

I understand his sentiment re: propaganda.

 

[luiza]

This is what Hamas' wants you to believe.

How many of you openly agree?

Yes . That is precisely what Israel effectively did .

Planned and executed a False Flag -- loads of evidence that they ensured that Hamas had relatively umntroubled entry and then manufactured endless stories to exaggerate what went on .

Their aim was the Oil and natural Gas which they had pre-sold to the extent that they handed out a dozen contracts within days for exploration rights .

Who cares if people die, if you get your hands on half a trillion and also clear out Gaza to the greater extent ?
Time will show , as ever .

 

[irosie91]

Yes . That is precisely what Israel effectively did .

Planned and executed a False Flag -- loads of evidence that they ensured that Hamas had relatively umntroubled entry and then manufactured endless stories to exaggerate what went on .

Their aim was the Oil and natural Gas which they had pre-sold to the extent that they handed out a dozen contracts within days for exploration rights .

Who cares if people die, if you get your hands on half a trillion and also clear out Gaza to the greater extent ?
Time will show , as ever .

Luiza provides an excellent example of islamic propaganda. I read it as a child in my VERY CHRISTIAN TOWN----in an area known to be the home of
pro-nazi enclaves in the USA----in fact, NOW it is known to be an area chock full of MUSLIM enclaves

 

[irosie91]

Luiza provides an excellent example of islamic propaganda. I read it as a child in my VERY CHRISTIAN TOWN----in an area known to be the home of
pro-nazi enclaves in the USA----in fact, NOW it is known to be an area chock full of MUSLIM enclaves

Surada disagrees-----I have no idea as to what she "DISAGREES" and have no doubt that she will not even TRY to justify her "disagreement"

 

[Frankenstein]

To you and all the others who are hanging on my words I can only say:

Start carrying your own ball, I don't have the time for the sky fairy routine again.

What about the sky fairy you believe in, that waved it's magic want and everything came out of nothing, life where there was no life matter where there was no matter

 

[Donald H]

What about the sky fairy you believe in, that waved it's magic want and everything came out of nothing, life where there was no life matter where there was no matter

You're thinking, and that's a beginning!
Did you know that the big banng theory is losing popularity now? Stay with me on this.

 

[MisterBeale]

I avoid quoting or citing information from INTEREST GROUPS no matter
how reliable I judge them to be.

I have seen you write some absurd things. . . but this? This has got to be among the most absurd.

If you can't detect the interest group, POV, or organization behind what it is that you are posting? Then you are steeped in the implicit bias of the information that you are posting.

It is important to detect the bias, and declare it, a priori.

ALL information, comes from someone's or a particular stake holder's POV. There is no such thing, as a neutral observer's presentation of the facts.

​

 

[irosie91]

Luiza provides an excellent example of islamic propaganda. I read it as a child in my VERY CHRISTIAN TOWN----in an area known to be the home of
pro-nazi enclaves in the USA----in fact, NOW it is known to be an area chock full of MUSLIM enclaves

oh gee----both buttercup and surada OBJECT to my very factual post. For the record---My childhood home was in a town founded PRE-REVOLUTIONARY---and the core population was STILL anglican----there were plaques here and there on old strurctures "GEORGE WASHINGTON WAS HERE" and in the parks old cannons painted as decorations (upon which we played) The town was COMPLETELY "restricted" until the post WW II baby boom (my family---
5 kids) was TYPICAL made selling little houses on what had been farmland---VERY PROFITABLE. Still in my time, there were no blacks---or Orientals---
they did allow Irish---reluctantly---and JEWS ----well---very reluctantly.
Churches on every corner----Lutheran, Presbyterian, "church of christ"---which was anglican. SUNDAY was a holiday and EVERYONE who dressed up in nylon dresses on Sunday KNEW "YOU (that's me) KILLED JESUS" There was islamo nazi propaganda FLUTTERING in the breeze and I was an avid READER

 

[Nobody911]

This is what Hamas' wants you to believe.

How many of you openly agree?

How many will take the cowards route and say "we can't know for sure"?

I want to emphasize that promoting hatred towards any religious or ethnic group is against the principles of responsible journalism and ethical communication. It is important to approach news with a critical mindset and be aware of the potential for propaganda.

Understanding that individuals from different backgrounds can have diverse perspectives is crucial for fostering empathy and avoiding unnecessary conflicts.Demonizing entire communities based on the actions of a few is counterproductive and contributes to a cycle of violence and suffering.

It's essential to recognize the complexity of geopolitical issues and avoid falling into the trap of divisive narratives that can lead to endless wars.Media outlets and individuals promoting such divisive narratives may inadvertently play into the hands of those who profit from conflicts, such as military-industrial companies.

Being aware of this dynamic is crucial for making informed decisions about the information we consume and share. Let's strive for understanding, empathy, and a more nuanced approach to complex global issues.

 

[Nobody911]

This is what Hamas' wants you to believe.

How many of you openly agree?

How many will take the cowards route and say "we can't know for sure"?

I want to emphasize that promoting hatred towards any religious or ethnic group is against the principles of responsible journalism and ethical communication. It is important to approach news with a critical mindset and be aware of the potential for propaganda.

Understanding that individuals from different backgrounds can have diverse perspectives is crucial for fostering empathy and avoiding unnecessary conflicts.Demonizing entire communities based on the actions of a few is counterproductive and contributes to a cycle of violence and suffering.

It's essential to recognize the complexity of geopolitical issues and avoid falling into the trap of divisive narratives that can lead to endless wars.Media outlets and individuals promoting such divisive narratives may inadvertently play into the hands of those who profit from conflicts, such as military-industrial companies.

Being aware of this dynamic is crucial for making informed decisions about the information we consume and share. Let's strive for understanding, empathy, and a more nuanced approach to complex global issues.

 

[Frankenstein]

You're thinking, and that's a beginning!
Did you know that the big banng theory is losing popularity now? Stay with me on this.

The only bang was, God spoke, the big bang theory of yours it is losing popularity because it is simply stupid.

 

[Donald H]

The only bang was, God spoke, the big bang theory of yours it is losing popularity because it is simply stupid.

The Catholic church ha doublecrossed kristyuns by accepting Darwinian evolution!

What next? Are they going to say too that a man didn't live for days in the belly of a big Pakicetus? (fish) (whale)

 

[Frankenstein]

The Catholic church ha doublecrossed kristyuns by accepting Darwinian evolution!

What next? Are they going to say too that a man didn't live for days in the belly of a big Pakicetus? (fish) (whale)

You think I am catholic?