Hakeem Jeffries promises that masked ICE agents will be identified

[jc456]

With language mirroring the Fifth Amendment, under the Fourteenth Amendment, the government (federal and state) cannot deprive any "person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." As noted above, the Fourteenth Amendment is part of a trio of amendments passed in the aftermath of the U.S. Civil War.

Fourteenth Amendment Due Process - U.S. Constitution - FindLaw​

U.S. Constitution - FindLaw
https://constitution.findlaw.com › annotation03




Who is subject to due process?


Due process protections apply to all individuals, both citizens and non-citizens, within the United States. This includes both natural persons (human beings) and legal persons (like corporations). The Fourteenth Amendment specifically prohibits states from depriving "any person" of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Similarly, the Fifth Amendment applies to the federal government.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

• Natural Persons:
  The term "any person" in the Fourteenth Amendment is interpreted to include all individuals, regardless of their citizenship status or race, according to the Supreme Court in Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886).
  
  
• Legal Persons:
  The Supreme Court has also recognized that due process protections extend to corporations and other legal entities, as seen in Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113 (1877).
  
  
• Scope of Protection:
  Due process ensures fair treatment and a chance to defend one's rights when the government seeks to deprive someone of life, liberty, or property.
  
  
• Procedural Due Process:
  This refers to the specific procedures that must be followed when the government takes action against an individual, such as the right to a fair hearing, notice of charges, and the right to present evidence.
  
  
• Substantive Due Process:
  This aspect of due process protects certain fundamental rights that are not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, but are considered to be essential for liberty, as discussed in Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972).

which ones says illegally here.

 

[jc456]

That is not what US Constitution says, and never has been. Do you support the US Constitution or do you even think about it?

they must ask for asylum before they are due due process, and it is different than for a citizen.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

He's upset that this country isn't the Soviet Union.

DERP

 

[White 6]

they must ask for asylum before they are due due process, and it is different than for a citizen.

Show me, where the US Constitution says anything like that. You cannot. It is not there.

 

[Godboy]

FBI

SEAL Team 6

 

[Edgetho]

That is not what US Constitution says, and never has been. Do you support the US Constitution or do you even think about it?

Like it or not, you are correct.

The question is: Are Illegals receving Due Process? I think they are. They all appear in front of an Immigration Judge or have an administrative hearing before they are booted.

The thing that pisses me of is, the scumbag Judiciary was hiding in the Bushes when Sponge Brains Shits Pants opened the flood gates for the Illegals and now, they want to give a Hearing and a Trial to over 20 MILLION Illegals? How do you do that?

It's kinda like the Constitution says you're entitled to a Defense Attorney. It doesn't say he has to be a GOOD Defense Attorney.

Illegals are entitled to Due Process as well. But how much and what kind, under what cricumstances?

If we had 12 Illegals in the Country, sure, go ahead. Give each one an F. Lee Bailey and we can sit in front of the TV like it's OJ redux and munch popcorn for a few weeks as a 10 Million Dollar Trial unfolds.

But we don't have 12, we have 20 MILLION!

dimocrap scum just want to be obstructionist at this point. It's not really sad, it's pathetic.

 

[WEATHER53]

"Hakeem Jeffries promises that masked ICE agents will be identified:

"This is America. This is not the Soviet Union. We're not behind the Iron Curtain. This is not the 1930s. And every single one of them, no matter what it takes, no matter how long it takes, will, of course, be identified."

Per the Trump admin, ICE agents are wearing masks because people are posting their photos online with death threats to their families.

Jeffries, of course, knows that."

https://t.co/fPN1hQesK9

I guess threatening the lives of federal agents and their families with human smuggling cartel violence is
how Democrats hope to win the midterms. Good luck with that. This is what we mean by the Democrat Party has been
captured by the radical Left.

By doing that he endangers them. If one comes to harm he would be charged as an accessory and possibly directly

 

[Edgetho]

which ones says illegally here.

 

[Billiejeens]

Remember when conservative hero G Gordon Luddy encouraged shooting government agents in the head?

Some things are timeless.

 

[BS Filter]

The Democrat plan is to overrun the system and bog it down with endless hearings. The system must be broken before it can be rebuilt. Believe it.

 

[jc456]

Show me, where the US Constitution says anything like that. You cannot. It is not there.

Is it legal to cross the U.S. border to seek asylum? | The IRC

People arriving at the U.S. border have the legal right to request asylum without being criminalized, turned back or separated from their children.

www.rescue.org

 

[Edgetho]

The Democrat plan is to overrun the system and bog it down with endless hearings. The system must be broken before it can be rebuilt. Believe it.

Cloward - Piven

Cloward–Piven strategy - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[jc456]

so you don't know what an illegal alien is?

 

[Edgetho]

Is it legal to cross the U.S. border to seek asylum? | The IRC

People arriving at the U.S. border have the legal right to request asylum without being criminalized, turned back or separated from their children.

www.rescue.org

Stop digging

 

[jc456]

Stop digging

you should put down your shovel then.

 

[konradv]

When do they arrest Hakeem Jeffries and charge him with felony threats against government employees?

It’s revealing who’s standing up for fascist police tactics and who’s standing up for us.

 

[WEATHER53]

.


Name one person they've "disappeared".







.

Ice responds to terrorist by adopting a few of their tactics. We don’t care about preserving the illegals identity. We DO Care as to law enforcement agencies

 

[konradv]

Even I don't have a fking clue what you said.

 

[WEATHER53]

There's a Constitutional right to invade the USA?

Lib loons feel illegals get granted constitutional rights upon illegal entry

 

[White 6]

Like it or not, you are correct.

The question is: Are Illegals receving Due Process? I think they are. They all appear in front of an Immigration Judge or have an administrative hearing before they are booted.

The thing that pisses me of is, the scumbag Judiciary was hiding in the Bushes when Sponge Brains Shits Pants opened the flood gates for the Illegals and now, they want to give a Hearing and a Trial to over 20 MILLION Illegals? How do you do that?

It's kinda like the Constitution says you're entitled to a Defense Attorney. It doesn't say he has to be a GOOD Defense Attorney.

Illegals are entitled to Due Process as well. But how much and what kind, under what cricumstances?

If we had 12 Illegals in the Country, sure, go ahead. Give each one an F. Lee Bailey and we can sit in front of the TV like it's OJ redux and munch popcorn for a few weeks as a 10 Million Dollar Trial unfolds.

But we don't have 12, we have 20 MILLION!

dimocrap scum just want to be obstructionist at this point. It's not really sad, it's pathetic.

I have no problem with illegals having lawyers. If not charged with a criminal offense, that could result in more than 11 months, 29 days incarceration (ie, misdemeanor vs felony) I definitely see no obligation to furnish a lawyer, at government expense on the taxpayer dollar. If there has been a legal hearing, and they have been found to be needed deportation, they should not be let go, but instead, simply deported. I have no problem with them filing an appeal, from the other side of the fence. Sending them to foreign prisons, paid for by us, (a government attempt to avoid them exercising their rights) is a separate issue, I simply do not support.