Noobs still expecting fairness and justice.
So cute. Took them for granted did you?
Sry. Only those who fight for them get them.
So cute. Took them for granted did you?
Sry. Only those who fight for them get them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Depravation of the right to cross examine functionality and faults. You NEVER destroy evidence of a crime prior to trial. This is considered a depravation of Baldwins Civil rights... This could also kill the case and see him walk free. Or was that the reason they did it...???Why do you think this matters?
The gun just went off in my hand defense has never once worked.Depravation of the right to cross examine functionality and faults. You NEVER destroy evidence of a crime prior to trial. This is considered a depravation of Baldwins Civil rights... This could also kill the case and see him walk free. Or was that the reason they did it...???
PROVE IT! The evidence has been destroyed... Now what are you going to do?The gun just went off in my hand defense has never once worked.
Why do you think this matters?
Seriously? The gun that the defense is going to claim misfired was destroyed, that is handing the defense a gift!Why do you think this matters?
More precisely an Acquittal...Seriously? The gun that the defense is going to claim misfired was destroyed, that is handing the defense a gift!
Let's imagine for a moment that Baldwin tried to say the gun was faulty. The very next question is why would you hire such a crappy weapons "expert"? He's still the boss and legally responsible for any kind of mishap on set.PROVE IT! The evidence has been destroyed... Now what are you going to do?
Yeah, I have NEVER heard of anything like that happening before.
Again PROVE IT or DISPROVE IT.. without the evidence you cannot. That is a violation of the defendants right to cross examine evidence. Mark my words, Baldwin is going to walk because of this.Let's imagine for a moment that Baldwin tried to say the gun was faulty. The very next question is why would you hire such a crappy weapons "expert"? He's still the boss and legally responsible for any kind of mishap on set.
Prove what? That he's legally responsible? His signature exists on every contract signed to make that movie as the executive producer. As the head honcho he contractually accepted the ultimate responsibility for what happens on set. Why is this concept eluding you so?Again PROVE IT or DISPROVE IT.. without the evidence you cannot. That is a violation of the defendants right to cross examine evidence. Mark my words, Baldwin is going to walk because of this.
Yeah.More precisely an Acquittal...
You do not. This has the smell of scuttling the prosecution's case to save Baldwin. This is a huge breach of Baldwins right to a fair trial. Frankly, I don't see how it survives this. This makes me think someone was paid off to do this. This needs a judicial investigation and those responsible dealt with. IF there is proof of communications with people in the Baldwin camp to do this then we have other charges.Why destroy evidence?
Why?
You do not. This has the smell of scuttling the prosecution's case to save Baldwin. This is a huge breach of Baldwins right to a fair trial. Frankly, I don't see how it survives this.
The firearm is the object in question without it there is no case.Not sure why you think this gun is evidence when it's obvious prosecutors had no intention of introducing it in court. The gun "expert" and the shooter are not in question. As the legally responsible parties on this film production their guilt is not in question. The only question to be answered is their individual level of negligence and the penalty.
The gun just went off in my hand defense has never once worked.