People in Muslim countries, people in China, people in North Korea. I am talking globally. Are you drunk? How are you not following along?
They all have the right to life and the right to defend their lives and the lives of their families. They have the right to have the tools of defense from their governments killing them. They all have the right to keep and bear arms.
Are you suggesting that, in any and every country, a person's rights are only what the government allows them and they have no right to object or expect anything other than what government allows? Rebellion is always wrong because there is nothing about which to rebel. Government is not restricting your rights because they come from government. You have no right to expect or ask for anything else. How can you rebel to ask for a thing that is not yours anyway?
Of course that's completely stupid because people do have inherent, God or nature - choose your own higher power - given rights. They recognize when those rights are violated and, after enduring it to their limits, they begin to protest and, if satisfaction is not received, eventually to rebel.
From the Declaration of Independence we learn that tolerating an abuse does not mean accepting the abuse or surrendering our rights. The abuses are accumulative over time and number. They are not forgotten and are not surrendered to.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
Words are important. Calling a right a privilege changes the discussion and, over time, the right is viewed as a privilege and, like the other leftists, we no longer view it as our right but, instead, accept it as if it had always been a privilege.