Turtlesoup
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2020
- 15,903
- 16,742
- 2,288
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Perhaps you missed the reports from doctors that used it successful on hundreds of COVID-19 patients because your news sources are among those that suppressed such stories because they align themselves with Fauci and Big Pharma. Fauci and Big Pharma didn't want HCQ used because was CHEAP and EFFECTIVE.Hydroxychloroquine does not reduce deaths from COVID-19, and probably does not reduce the number of people needing mechanical ventilation. Hydroxychloroquine caused more unwanted effects than a placebo treatment, though it did not appear to increase the number of serious unwanted effects.St Trumpy knew.
He knows everything.
A National Institutes of Health clinical trial evaluating the safety and effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has formally concluded that the drug provides no clinical benefit to hospitalized patients.
- Based on the available medical data at this time, hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine are not effective for treating or preventing COVID-19. Though some small studies initially suggested that the medications may be helpful, many other larger studies saw no benefit.
- The FDA has stated that it was no longer reasonable to believe that hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine were effective in treating COVID-19, and revoked their Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for these medications. The NIH and WHO have also stopped their own hydroxychloroquine studies after finding the drug had no clinical benefit.
- There have been no studies showing that these medications work for prevention, and the FDA has issued a warning for serious heart-related side effects if hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine are taken outside of a hospital setting for COVID-19.
Hint: His opposition to the treatment hit him heavy in the pocketbook. With him, it's all about the money.Prior to the pandemic, hydroxychloroquine had been used safely for 65 years in millions of patients. Thanks to Fauci’s campaign against the treatment, tech giants began censoring those who advocated for it on their platform.
Fauci has yet to answer for his staunch opposition to the treatment. Recent developments show that he was aware of the government cover-up of the origin of the coronavirus.
i read the shit source you linked, which linked to other shit sources, and eventually cited an indian scientist saying that fauci wrote something in 1985.Are you thinking that if you claim to not have read what Fauci wrote, that what he wrote doesn't exist?i am calling you a liar, based on your spotless track record of always lying.Are you calling flip floppin' fauci a liar?cite what fauci wrote in 1985. surely you know what you are talking about, eh?This emotional outburst shows that what Fauci wrote about hydroxychloroquine being effective against viruses back in 1985 is politically inconvenient for you. You will probably have to pretend that you never even read the article.Oh yes, Dr Fauci wrote that HCQ worked as an anti-viral agent despite being an anti-malarial drug. Flip floppin' fauci knew it worked way back in the 1980s.
![]()
Guess Who Knew In 1985 That Hydroxychloroquine Was Effective Against Viruses?
What if someone told you that Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, once wrote that Hydroxychloroquine wathewashingtonstandard.com
You're just making shit up at this point.
btw, research has not stopped after 1985. numerous papers have been published, showing for example that hcq is not effective for treating sars.
now, how about sharing with the board what fauci wrote in 1985?
you have such a strong opinion about this, so naturally i must assume that you have read it, and can share it with us uninformed sheep.
I remember playing hide n seek as a kid, and seeing one kid actually cover his eyes as a way to hide. He thought that if he couldn't see anyone else, then nobody could see him.
I don't know or care you think this is a gocha moment for you? It's not really. The new variant is more deadly and killing mostly people who haven't got the vaccine. God speed bro.sealybobo So the NIH that FAuci headed claimed that Hydrochloroquin didn't work as Fauci was doing in 2019, but Fauci knew that it worked as far back as 1985---sounds like conspiracy to commit fraud and murder.
How do you or they know the hydrooxy worked? Spitballers. Probably Republican doctors. They exist. They probably also believe that global warming is a hoax too or that the election was rigged. I would not seek those doctors help.Perhaps you missed the reports from doctors that used it successful on hundreds of COVID-19 patients because your news sources are among those that suppressed such stories because they align themselves with Fauci and Big Pharma. Fauci and Big Pharma didn't want HCQ used because was CHEAP and EFFECTIVE.Hydroxychloroquine does not reduce deaths from COVID-19, and probably does not reduce the number of people needing mechanical ventilation. Hydroxychloroquine caused more unwanted effects than a placebo treatment, though it did not appear to increase the number of serious unwanted effects.St Trumpy knew.
He knows everything.
A National Institutes of Health clinical trial evaluating the safety and effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has formally concluded that the drug provides no clinical benefit to hospitalized patients.
- Based on the available medical data at this time, hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine are not effective for treating or preventing COVID-19. Though some small studies initially suggested that the medications may be helpful, many other larger studies saw no benefit.
- The FDA has stated that it was no longer reasonable to believe that hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine were effective in treating COVID-19, and revoked their Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for these medications. The NIH and WHO have also stopped their own hydroxychloroquine studies after finding the drug had no clinical benefit.
- There have been no studies showing that these medications work for prevention, and the FDA has issued a warning for serious heart-related side effects if hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine are taken outside of a hospital setting for COVID-19.
You entire article is full of politically biased lies.
![]()
Doctor sees success in using hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 as heart risk concerns mount
The anti-malaria medication, hydroxychloroquine, is under the microscope in a clinical trial after making national headlines. Last week, the FDA warned against using the drug outside a hospital setting or clinical trial citing heart risk concerns. The drug has been widely touted by President...abc6onyourside.com
![]()
Laguna Doctor Claims Success Treating Coronavirus Patients
Touting the same anti-malaria drug being advocated by President Donald Trump, an OC doctor says he's seeing good results with patients.patch.com
![]()
Emails reportedly show Fauci was informed on success of hydroxychloroquine in early 2020
Dr. Anthony Fauci once told CNN hydroxychloroquine was dangerous and recent emails show he knew about its effectiveness.www.bizpacreview.com
Hint: His opposition to the treatment hit him heavy in the pocketbook. With him, it's all about the money.Prior to the pandemic, hydroxychloroquine had been used safely for 65 years in millions of patients. Thanks to Fauci’s campaign against the treatment, tech giants began censoring those who advocated for it on their platform.
Fauci has yet to answer for his staunch opposition to the treatment. Recent developments show that he was aware of the government cover-up of the origin of the coronavirus.
No dearsealybobo No dear...the evidence CLEARLY shows that TRUMP acted in the best interest of the US, leading the world in the response to the COVID KUNG FLU. This is a fact despite nitwitted spin.
GREEDY LYING Dr Fauci and the NIH------worked to harm the US on many levels. Among them was with the drugs meant to fight the virus. Everyone currently gets Remdesivor --maybe a PLASMA treatment---and some steriods for treatment of the KuNG FLU-----they do this because of this dipshit greedy sack of shit Fauci who helped invent the virus and he has made millions $$$ from it. Fauci sought to rule out other viral treatments to promote his money maker.
This revelation that flip 'floppin' fauci wrote that hydroxychloroquine is effective against viruses, way back in 1985, is politically inconvenient for lefties. Every lefty on this thread wants to destroy this politically inconvenient mess, so every one of you has already read the article in the link in search of some way to discredit it. Obviously you have all come to the realization that there is no way to undo what flip floppin' fauci already said, so now it comes down to which method of cheating to use. Do you change the topic, deny that fauci said what he said, discredit fauci himself, ask for quotes that have already been provided, or do you spin what flip flopping fauci said? Since we are seeing all of these tactics being used here, you guys are not very coordinated in your effort to cheat.Quote Fauci saying what you imagined he said please.
JackOfNoTrades Actually, it was found to be very effective in treating the KUNG FLU all over the world. It was FAUCI And the NIH making money off another Viral that claimed Hydroxychloroquine didn't work the studies were showing that it was. We need to do a foresenci audit of our crooked little bastard Fauci.
And after writing that hydroxychloroquine was effective against viruses back in 1985...JackOfNoTrades Actually, it was found to be very effective in treating the KUNG FLU all over the world. It was FAUCI And the NIH making money off another Viral that claimed Hydroxychloroquine didn't work the studies were showing that it was. We need to do a foresenci audit of our crooked little bastard Fauci.
Flip floppin' fauci said in 1985 that hydroxychloroquine is indeed effective against viruses. Are you calling him a liar?JackOfNoTrades Actually, it was found to be very effective in treating the KUNG FLU all over the world. It was FAUCI And the NIH making money off another Viral that claimed Hydroxychloroquine didn't work the studies were showing that it was. We need to do a foresenci audit of our crooked little bastard Fauci.
Again, hydroxy was not found to be effective in treating or preventing COVID. It was also administered at more than 2X the dosage one would take for the remaining diseases that it was proven to be effective at. The Henry Ford study is about the only one with half a leg to stand on when making that claim. Their data was a small sample size and not peer reviewed. Again, you are taking a public health and safety issue and making it political.
This revelation that flip 'floppin' fauci wrote that hydroxychloroquine is effective against viruses, way back in 1985, is politically inconvenient for lefties. Every lefty on this thread wants to destroy this politically inconvenient mess, so every one of you has already read the article in the link in search of some way to discredit it. Obviously you have all come to the realization that there is no way to undo what flip floppin' fauci already said, so now it comes down to which method of cheating to use. Do you change the topic, deny that fauci said what he said, discredit fauci himself, ask for quotes that have already been provided, or do you spin what flip flopping fauci said? Since we are seeing all of these tactics being used here, you guys are not very coordinated in your effort to cheat.Quote Fauci saying what you imagined he said please.
Exactly. That leads to this question. How many people died or suffered unnecessarily because Dr. Fauci was trying to help the pharmaceutical industry make a big profit?There was no profit in hydroxychloroquine.
Yea but he didn't stop it from coming in from anywhere else in the world. He just picked on China.sealybobo None died because of Trump. The big spreaders of the disease were CUOMO who was in almost daily contact with our GREEDY FUCKING FAUCI and other dem governors who I bet all were heavily "invested" in REMDESVOIRs parent company purposely spreading the disease around in nursing homes to the most vulnerable of patients. TRump acted to stop the spread by trying to ban infected Chinese from bringing the disease over. THESE BE THE FACTS BABY...all documented.
Flip floppin' fauci said in 1985 that hydroxychloroquine is indeed effective against viruses. Are you calling him a liar?JackOfNoTrades Actually, it was found to be very effective in treating the KUNG FLU all over the world. It was FAUCI And the NIH making money off another Viral that claimed Hydroxychloroquine didn't work the studies were showing that it was. We need to do a foresenci audit of our crooked little bastard Fauci.
Again, hydroxy was not found to be effective in treating or preventing COVID. It was also administered at more than 2X the dosage one would take for the remaining diseases that it was proven to be effective at. The Henry Ford study is about the only one with half a leg to stand on when making that claim. Their data was a small sample size and not peer reviewed. Again, you are taking a public health and safety issue and making it political.
Which of the tactics that you just quoted are you attempting to use here? Are you denying that he said what he did? Are you trying to spin it? Please clarify your position.This revelation that flip 'floppin' fauci wrote that hydroxychloroquine is effective against viruses, way back in 1985, is politically inconvenient for lefties. Every lefty on this thread wants to destroy this politically inconvenient mess, so every one of you has already read the article in the link in search of some way to discredit it. Obviously you have all come to the realization that there is no way to undo what flip floppin' fauci already said, so now it comes down to which method of cheating to use. Do you change the topic, deny that fauci said what he said, discredit fauci himself, ask for quotes that have already been provided, or do you spin what flip flopping fauci said? Since we are seeing all of these tactics being used here, you guys are not very coordinated in your effort to cheat.Quote Fauci saying what you imagined he said please.
Not going to address any of the questions that have been put to you, huh? Just gonna keep pounding the narrative. Sad.
I'm sorry, I can't find any of the quotes your bullshit article is referencing. Perhaps you'll link something reputable?...I won't hold my breath.