No court, no part of any government, no mortal authority, has any more power to define marriage to include a homosexual mockery thereof, than it has to define a tomato as not being a fruit.
Unfortunatly [sic] for you and your ilk, the court has don just that and after 6 years there have been no successful challanges [sic] to it.
Marriage is still only between a man and a woman, even though a corrupt court lied and said it could be between two men or between two women.
Marriage is what it has always been, and what it will always be, in spite of the hubris of lofty judges who presume to override God and nature and science.
Likewise, a tomato always has been a fruit, and will always be a fruit, notwithstanding the ruling in Nix v. Hedden that asserted that it is not a fruit.
And if the courts ever rule that two plus two equals ten, then they will be just as wrong as in these two rulings cited here.
Some realities cannot be changed, merely by enacting a law, or making a court ruling, nor by any other act of government.