Grand Jury Foreman refutes activist judge, documents Comey indictments were done correctly

[EMH]

There are a lot of "Alliance for Treason Against America" members pretending to be judges in America.... and they need to be "replaced."

Grand jury properly voted on James Comey’s indictment, foreman claims in blow to defense: ‘Eliminates any doubt’

The Sept. 25 grand jury transcript “conclusively refutes” that there was an issue with the voting process, prosecutors said.

nypost.com

 

[Lockback]

There are a lot of "Alliance for Treason Against America" members pretending to be judges in America.... and they need to be "replaced."

Grand jury properly voted on James Comey’s indictment, foreman claims in blow to defense: ‘Eliminates any doubt’

The Sept. 25 grand jury transcript “conclusively refutes” that there was an issue with the voting process, prosecutors said.

nypost.com

Too many judges out of control, undermining this country.

 

[cnm]

There are a lot of "Alliance for Treason Against America" members pretending to be judges in America.... and they need to be "replaced."

Grand jury properly voted on James Comey’s indictment, foreman claims in blow to defense: ‘Eliminates any doubt’

The Sept. 25 grand jury transcript “conclusively refutes” that there was an issue with the voting process, prosecutors said.

nypost.com

Note it avoids saying all the jurors saw the actual separate 2nd indictment. Funny that. Agreeing on a package does not mean seeing it formally documented.

“It was the very first count that we did not agree on,” the grand jury foreperson told Vaala, per the transcript, “and the Count Two and Three were then put in a different package, which we agreed on.”​

 

[cnm]

Too many judges out of control, undermining this country.

That corrupt USSC is a prime example, inventing kings out of nothing but arse witterings.

 

[Crepitus]

There are a lot of "Alliance for Treason Against America" members pretending to be judges in America.... and they need to be "replaced."

Grand jury properly voted on James Comey’s indictment, foreman claims in blow to defense: ‘Eliminates any doubt’

The Sept. 25 grand jury transcript “conclusively refutes” that there was an issue with the voting process, prosecutors said.

nypost.com

It wasn't the judge who said they weren't, it was the prosecutors.

The judge was operating on the information he was given.

Now suddenly they have changed their story.

Weird, huh?

 

[Crepitus]

Note it avoids saying all the jurors saw the actual separate 2nd indictment. Funny that. Agreeing on a package does not mean seeing it formally documented.

“It was the very first count that we did not agree on,” the grand jury foreperson told Vaala, per the transcript, “and the Count Two and Three were then put in a different package, which we agreed on.”​

Halligan and blondi are in "cover your ass" mode.

 

[Seymour Flops]

It wasn't the judge who said they weren't, it was the prosecutors.

The judge was operating on the information he was given.

Now suddenly they have changed their story.

Weird, huh?

Both the foreperson and the prosecutors agree that the Grand Jury saw everything it was supposed to see.

1:15



Comey will do hard time. Get used to that idea.

 

[Independent thinker]

Too many judges out of control, undermining this country.

And, under Biden and the dems (and during Trump 1), FBI and CIA operatives were involved in undermining Trump.

 

[Lockback]

And, under Biden and the dems (and during Trump 1), FBI and CIA operatives were involved in undermining Trump.

They still are.
That video by Senator Mark Kelly and Ellise Slotkin urging military insurrection against Trump is an example: he's ex-NASA and she's ex-CIA.

 

[excalibur]

Note it avoids saying all the jurors saw the actual separate 2nd indictment. Funny that. Agreeing on a package does not mean seeing it formally documented.

​

They don't all have to see it, as long as there is a quorum, and they get 12 votes to indict.

 

[EMH]

It wasn't the judge who said they weren't, it was the prosecutors.

The judge was operating on the information he was given.

Now suddenly they have changed their story.

Weird, huh?

There was no change of story, liar.

The judge made up BS out of thin air and got a full week of nonstop media coverage. The truth is back out, the indictments stand, and one more sick treasonous left wing liar pretending to be a judge needs to be impeached ASAP.

 

[excalibur]

They still are.
That video by Senator Mark Kelly and Ellise Slotkin urging military insurrection against Trump is an example: he's ex-NASA and she's ex-CIA.

He was in the military. Recall him to active duty and charge him under the UCMJ.

 

[excalibur]

There was no change of story, liar.

The judge made up BS out of thin air and got a full week of nonstop media coverage. The truth is back out, the indictments stand, and one more sick treasonous left wing liar pretending to be a judge needs to be impeached ASAP.

He is a magistrate judge not Article III, the real judges can fire him.

 

[Crepitus]

Both the foreperson and the prosecutors agree that the Grand Jury saw everything it was supposed to see.

1:15



Comey will do hard time. Get used to that idea.

Now they say that, or rather "insist" as you say, but that's not what they said the first time.

 

[Crepitus]

There was no change of story, liar.

But there was, sorry.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Now they say that, or rather "insist" as you say, but that's not what they said the first time.

Now they know different and so informed the court. Unlike Democrats and "not Democrats" clinging to the same lies no matter what.

 

[EMH]

He is a magistrate judge not Article III, the real judges can fire him.

They need to, tomorrow morning.

 

[EMH]

But there was, sorry.

WHAT CHANGED?

LIAR. This isn't MSNBC....

 

[excalibur]

Also, the court reporter.

 

[Billiejeens]

Now they say that, or rather "insist" as you say, but that's not what they said the first time.

Poor creepy