Grand Jury Foreman refutes activist judge, documents Comey indictments were done correctly

EMH

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2021
Messages
30,743
Reaction score
18,131
Points
2,788
There are a lot of "Alliance for Treason Against America" members pretending to be judges in America.... and they need to be "replaced."


Note it avoids saying all the jurors saw the actual separate 2nd indictment. Funny that. Agreeing on a package does not mean seeing it formally documented.

“It was the very first count that we did not agree on,” the grand jury foreperson told Vaala, per the transcript, “and the Count Two and Three were then put in a different package, which we agreed on.”
 
There are a lot of "Alliance for Treason Against America" members pretending to be judges in America.... and they need to be "replaced."


It wasn't the judge who said they weren't, it was the prosecutors.

The judge was operating on the information he was given.

Now suddenly they have changed their story.

Weird, huh?
 
Note it avoids saying all the jurors saw the actual separate 2nd indictment. Funny that. Agreeing on a package does not mean seeing it formally documented.

“It was the very first count that we did not agree on,” the grand jury foreperson told Vaala, per the transcript, “and the Count Two and Three were then put in a different package, which we agreed on.”
Halligan and blondi are in "cover your ass" mode.
 
It wasn't the judge who said they weren't, it was the prosecutors.

The judge was operating on the information he was given.

Now suddenly they have changed their story.

Weird, huh?
Both the foreperson and the prosecutors agree that the Grand Jury saw everything it was supposed to see.

1:15



Comey will do hard time. Get used to that idea.
 
Note it avoids saying all the jurors saw the actual separate 2nd indictment. Funny that. Agreeing on a package does not mean seeing it formally documented.


They don't all have to see it, as long as there is a quorum, and they get 12 votes to indict.
 
It wasn't the judge who said they weren't, it was the prosecutors.

The judge was operating on the information he was given.

Now suddenly they have changed their story.

Weird, huh?




There was no change of story, liar.

The judge made up BS out of thin air and got a full week of nonstop media coverage. The truth is back out, the indictments stand, and one more sick treasonous left wing liar pretending to be a judge needs to be impeached ASAP.
 
There was no change of story, liar.

The judge made up BS out of thin air and got a full week of nonstop media coverage. The truth is back out, the indictments stand, and one more sick treasonous left wing liar pretending to be a judge needs to be impeached ASAP.


He is a magistrate judge not Article III, the real judges can fire him.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: EMH
Both the foreperson and the prosecutors agree that the Grand Jury saw everything it was supposed to see.

1:15



Comey will do hard time. Get used to that idea.

Now they say that, or rather "insist" as you say, but that's not what they said the first time.
 
Now they say that, or rather "insist" as you say, but that's not what they said the first time.
Now they know different and so informed the court. Unlike Democrats and "not Democrats" clinging to the same lies no matter what.
 
15th post
Also, the court reporter.


G6J3DuPXEAARuTA
 
Back
Top Bottom