froggy
Gold Member
- Aug 18, 2009
- 12,490
- 2,655
- 245
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your silly gov't at work.Here's one....
In the state of Iowa, if a man and a woman live together without the benefit of marriage and even if there no children produced between them but the woman had children living with her at the time the cohabitation began, the man can be held liable for the minor children should the relationship end and the cohabitation terminated.
In other words, the boyfriend could end up supporting another man's kids. WTF!!!!!
Here's one....
In the state of Iowa, if a man and a woman live together without the benefit of marriage and even if there no children produced between them but the woman had children living with her at the time the cohabitation began, the man can be held liable for the minor children should the relationship end and the cohabitation terminated.
In other words, the boyfriend could end up supporting another man's kids. WTF!!!!!
Then don't cohabit.
Without proper context calling the regs bizarre or ridiculous is premature. There's a lot left out of the blurbs in the story.
Oh, give it up, clemmie. The far right does not care about people at all.Then don't cohabit.
So, if they don't like the ridiculous regulation, they should alter their personal behavior? Government is now in the middle of your relationships.
Usually, the left tells us it's society's responsibility to raise children even when both parents are alive and able-bodied but just don't work.
If a person does work, the left loves making regulations that are designed to separate people from their property and money.
Oh, give it up, clemmie. The far right does not care about people at all.Then don't cohabit.
So, if they don't like the ridiculous regulation, they should alter their personal behavior? Government is now in the middle of your relationships.
Usually, the left tells us it's society's responsibility to raise children even when both parents are alive and able-bodied but just don't work.
If a person does work, the left loves making regulations that are designed to separate people from their property and money.
Yeah just let the fucking government tell you what to do in your private lifeThen don't cohabit.
Then don't cohabit.
Yeah just let the fucking government tell you what to do in your private life
Hey why don't we just have the government tell us what to eat, what to set our thermostats at, what we drive, where we live, when we shit etc
That would be utopia for a retard like you wouldn't it?
I know I'm just glad I'll be dead and gone when it does
Then don't cohabit.Yeah just let the fucking government tell you what to do in your private life
Hey why don't we just have the government tell us what to eat, what to set our thermostats at, what we drive, where we live, when we shit etc
That would be utopia for a retard like you wouldn't it?
That day is a coming
the thing is it's already like thatThe problem with laws that control private property is that it kind of violates our sense of control over it which inhibits our desire to use it for our own purpose. Who likes giving up control over anything or having to ask our neighbor if we can do with our stuff the things we want to do with it. What would be the fun in that?
There has to be a lot more than 12 ridiculous regulations. Pols and government bureaucrats use regulations to protect their donors...big corps love regulations. More proof of a corrupt incompetent central government.
And? According to whom?The United States has now dropped to #11 in the world regarding freedom and business due to our massive over-regulation...