Government Advisors say Not To Consume Alcohol, Tomatoes or Lamb

G.G

Member
Mar 13, 2009
67
18
6
Gov't advisors seek to cut 'high carbon' foods of menus... lamb, alcohol, tomatoes

Out will go kebabs, greenhouse tomatoes and alcohol. Instead, diners will be encouraged to consume more potatoes and seasonal vegetables, as well as pork and chicken, which generate fewer carbon emissions.

“Changing our lifestyles, including our diets, is going to be one of the crucial elements in cutting carbon emissions,” said David Kennedy, chief executive of the Committee on Climate Change.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2258139/posts

Does anyone else think this is absurd? The way it reads, is that we will soon be told to limit how much alcohol we drink and how many tomatoes we can eat :cuckoo:

"We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times ... and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK,"
 
Last edited:
Gov't advisors seek to cut 'high carbon' foods of menus... lamb, alcohol, tomatoes

GIVE up lamb roasts and save the planet. Government advisers are developing menus to combat climate change by cutting out “high carbon” food such as meat from sheep, whose burping poses a serious threat to the environment.

Out will go kebabs, greenhouse tomatoes and alcohol. Instead, diners will be encouraged to consume more potatoes and seasonal vegetables, as well as pork and chicken, which generate fewer carbon emissions.

“Changing our lifestyles, including our diets, is going to be one of the crucial elements in cutting carbon emissions,” said David Kennedy, chief executive of the Committee on Climate Change.

Kennedy has stopped eating his favourite doner kebabs because they contain lamb.

A government-sponsored study into greenhouse gases found that producing 2.2lb of lamb released the equivalent of 37lb of carbon dioxide.

The problem is because sheep burp so much methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Cows are only slightly better behaved. The production of 2.2lb of beef releases methane equivalent to 35lb of CO2 Tomatoes, most of which are grown in heated glasshouses, are the most “carbon-intensive” vegetable, each 2.2lb generating more than 20lb of CO2 Potatoes, in contrast, release only about 1lb of CO2 for each 2.2lb of food. The figures are similar for most other native fruit and vegetables.

“We are not saying that everyone should become vegetarian or give up drinking but moving towards less carbon intensive foods will reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve health,” said Kennedy.

The climate committee is analysing emissions from farming and will suggest measures to reduce them. However, it has concluded that people will have to change their habits.

Alcoholic drinks are another significant contributory factor, with the growing and processing of crops such as hops and malt into beer and whisky helping to generate 1.5% of the nation’s greenhouse gases.

The Carbon Trust, a government-funded firm, is working with food and drink companies to calculate the “carbon footprints” of products - sometimes with surprising results.

Coca-Cola, for example, generates only about half the greenhouse gas emissions of Innocent’s “smoothies”. Cadbury’s chocolate generates about 4½lb for every 2.2lb eaten - less than half that from theof CO2 same weight of chicken.

Does anyone else think this is absurd? The way it reads, is that we will soon be told to limit how much alcohol we drink and how many tomatoes we can eat :cuckoo:

"We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times ... and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK,"









You must try to remain calm and just realize the democwat socialist libtards are crawling out of the woodwork, yes it is insanity but they don't recognize it as such.. just smile and nod.:lol:
 
Did the article claim that growing plants, a process that takes CO2 out of the atmosphere, helped contribute to global warming? I don't doubt that the processing, whatever that includes, has an effect, but I'm pretty sure growing plants does the opposite.
 
Did the article claim that growing plants, a process that takes CO2 out of the atmosphere, helped contribute to global warming? I don't doubt that the processing, whatever that includes, has an effect, but I'm pretty sure growing plants does the opposite.




this planet would die without CO2
 
The whole thing is absurd. Lambs burp to much so you can't eat lamb like you use to be allowed to. Sounds a bit loco to me :cuckoo:

I can think of better ways to spend government money rather than sponsor a study like this.

Your taxdollars at work folks; aren't you proud :redface:
 
Gov't advisors seek to cut 'high carbon' foods of menus... lamb, alcohol, tomatoes

GIVE up lamb roasts and save the planet. Government advisers are developing menus to combat climate change by cutting out “high carbon” food such as meat from sheep, whose burping poses a serious threat to the environment.

Out will go kebabs, greenhouse tomatoes and alcohol. Instead, diners will be encouraged to consume more potatoes and seasonal vegetables, as well as pork and chicken, which generate fewer carbon emissions.

“Changing our lifestyles, including our diets, is going to be one of the crucial elements in cutting carbon emissions,” said David Kennedy, chief executive of the Committee on Climate Change.

Kennedy has stopped eating his favourite doner kebabs because they contain lamb.

A government-sponsored study into greenhouse gases found that producing 2.2lb of lamb released the equivalent of 37lb of carbon dioxide.

The problem is because sheep burp so much methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Cows are only slightly better behaved. The production of 2.2lb of beef releases methane equivalent to 35lb of CO2 Tomatoes, most of which are grown in heated glasshouses, are the most “carbon-intensive” vegetable, each 2.2lb generating more than 20lb of CO2 Potatoes, in contrast, release only about 1lb of CO2 for each 2.2lb of food. The figures are similar for most other native fruit and vegetables.

“We are not saying that everyone should become vegetarian or give up drinking but moving towards less carbon intensive foods will reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve health,” said Kennedy.

The climate committee is analysing emissions from farming and will suggest measures to reduce them. However, it has concluded that people will have to change their habits.

Alcoholic drinks are another significant contributory factor, with the growing and processing of crops such as hops and malt into beer and whisky helping to generate 1.5% of the nation’s greenhouse gases.

The Carbon Trust, a government-funded firm, is working with food and drink companies to calculate the “carbon footprints” of products - sometimes with surprising results.

Coca-Cola, for example, generates only about half the greenhouse gas emissions of Innocent’s “smoothies”. Cadbury’s chocolate generates about 4½lb for every 2.2lb eaten - less than half that from theof CO2 same weight of chicken.

Does anyone else think this is absurd? The way it reads, is that we will soon be told to limit how much alcohol we drink and how many tomatoes we can eat :cuckoo:

"We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times ... and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK,"

Where did you get the article?
 
The whole thing is absurd. Lambs burp to much so you can't eat lamb like you use to be allowed to. Sounds a bit loco to me :cuckoo:

I can think of better ways to spend government money rather than sponsor a study like this.

Your taxdollars at work folks; aren't you proud :redface:
If you'd provided a link everyone would realize this is in Britain not the US.
 
The whole thing is absurd. Lambs burp to much so you can't eat lamb like you use to be allowed to. Sounds a bit loco to me :cuckoo:

I can think of better ways to spend government money rather than sponsor a study like this.

Your taxdollars at work folks; aren't you proud :redface:
If you'd provided a link everyone would realize this is in Britain not the US.



being in Britain makes it no less absurb,, you do of course know the mainstay of the muslim diet???
 
Doesn't matter if it's England, U.S. or east Ja-pip. It's asinine. Gotta give Algorical and his banish brigade credit, they sure have gotten the loons a hopping and a jumping. Too bad Joe Average will be the one to get squeezed on all this shit. I'm gonna go running and expel even more CO2. Fuck you, all you retarded green sheep.
 
The whole thing is absurd. Lambs burp to much so you can't eat lamb like you use to be allowed to. Sounds a bit loco to me :cuckoo:

I can think of better ways to spend government money rather than sponsor a study like this.

Your taxdollars at work folks; aren't you proud :redface:
If you'd provided a link everyone would realize this is in Britain not the US.



being in Britain makes it no less absurb,, you do of course know the mainstay of the muslim diet???

British sheep are notoriously flatulent. As are British politicians.
 
If CO2 really were an enemy of the environment, a pollutant, they would first be banning its manufacture and use for things such as water treatment, fire fighting, hollywood special effects, and so on. Millions of tons of CO2 are manufactured and used daily in these various ways.

But apparently they believe CO2 is like cholesterol, there's a "good" and a "bad" CO2, and the only "bad" CO2 is as a product of fossil fuel combustion within only the United States and Europe. "Developing" countries.... Their CO2 is the "good" kind as well.

Still another obvious reason this whole Goebbels Warming shit is just an outright lie, designed to control people.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top