So much for Ryan standing by his principles. He's just like Romney--saying what they need to in order to get elected. I don't trust these two guys as far as I could throw them. Do they say what they believe or do they say what they believe they need to say to get elected. What will be their final answer if elected?
First, the biased article is weak journalism that makes blanket assumptions. Second, I wouldn't think libs would applaud a conservative supporting abortion in case of rape. Third, funny how you attack conservatives for a change in stance, but support Obama when he makes one flipflop after another!
I have no idea what libs might applaud but I don't. I am an independent voter and this is one issue where I disagree with republicans. Abortion should be a personal choice and not for others to decide. Although I wouldn't advise abortion in most cases, I think the decision should be the woman's and it should be legal. I take offense to mostly white MEN sitting in judgment in legislatures across this country of what should be allowed and what shouldn't. The ONLY restriction I would apply would be late term abortions and the so-called after birth abortions if there really is such a thing. Once the fetus is viable outside the womb, I draw the line--around the 6th month. But even then it is questionable as to viability and I still think within reason it should be the woman's choice. And as far as Ryan being ONLY the VP, if his stances and flip flops don't matter, why was he chosen and why are some saying he's a game changer, etc? Duplicitous opinions!
