...full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…
1.Today we see the problem of the identity politics, the divide-and-conquer method that has heretofore brought success to the slavery party.
The problem is that it contains a poison pill: the party itself is divided.
2. While at the moment, tribalism, identity politics, may seem a triumph for the Democrat Party, it is also the rock on which a fragile constituency rolls....and splits.
"...Obama’s 2008 coalition was always more fragile than Democrats at the time believed, and that there remain obstacles to the John Judis/Ruy Teixeira theory of an Emerging Democratic Majority. Trende’s major point is that all such predictions of enduring partisan majorities (he cites many dating back over the past century and a half) ignore the fact that political coalitions inevitably draw together factions with different interests and ideologies, and frictions within those coalitions inevitably offer opportunities for the other party to regain support."
The Southern Strategy Myth and the Lost Majority
On the one hand, the old-guard Democrats, who were careful to walk the line between radicalism, and centrism, and the new upstarts who wave un-American banners of socialism, anti-white and anti-Jewish bias.
The latter have no respect for the former, as one can see in the attacks on Biden by the Sandersites.
The poor fools who have been trained to vote with the "D" no matter the issues have a choice to make, and are not equipped to do so.
3. Perhaps the handwriting is on the wall in what should be a reliable state for the Democrats, Wisconsin.
"...AP reported in early February, Liberals eye 2020 takeover of Wisconsin Supreme Court:
Wisconsin liberals hope to take a key step this spring toward breaking a long conservative stranglehold on the state’s Supreme Court, in an election that could also serve as a barometer of the political mood in a key presidential swing state.
If the liberal-backed candidate wins the April 2 state Supreme Court race, liberals would be in prime position to take over the court when the next seat comes up in 2020 — during a presidential primary when Democrats expect to benefit from strong turnout.
The bitterly partisan court, which conservatives have controlled since 2008, has upheld several polarizing Republican-backed laws, none more so than former GOP Gov. Scott Walker’s law that essentially eliminated collective bargaining for public workers.
If liberals can win in April and again in 2020, they would have the majority until at least 2025.
Liberals are worried this might mean Trump will win again in Wisconsin in 2020."
4. AND....this election was decided BEFORE AG Barr dropped the bombshell that validated what we on the Right have said for two years:
“Barr Asserts Intelligence Agencies Spied on the Trump Campaign
· April 10, 2019
WASHINGTON — Attorney General William P. Barr said on Wednesday that he would scrutinize the F.B.I.’s investigation of the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia, including whether “spying” conducted by American intelligence agencies on the campaign’s associates had been properly carried out.
“I think spying on a political campaign is a big deal,” Mr. Barr said during testimony before a Senate Appropriations subcommittee, adding that he wanted to look into both “the genesis and the conduct” of the F.B.I. inquiry. He cast his interest as a matter of protecting civil liberties from potential abuse by the government.
“I think spying did occur,” Mr. Barr said. “The question is whether it was adequately predicated. And I’m not suggesting that it wasn’t adequately predicated. But I need to explore that.”
The remarks by the new attorney general — particularly his embrace of the term spying, which is frequently invoked by critics of the Russia investigation — are certain to please President Trump and his allies, who have accused American law enforcement officials of targeting his campaign out of political malice.” Barr Asserts Intelligence Agencies Spied on the Trump Campaign
For clarity:
Difference between Watergate and the Obama Spying? Watergate was a failed attempt by a political party to spy on their political enemies.
1.Today we see the problem of the identity politics, the divide-and-conquer method that has heretofore brought success to the slavery party.
The problem is that it contains a poison pill: the party itself is divided.
2. While at the moment, tribalism, identity politics, may seem a triumph for the Democrat Party, it is also the rock on which a fragile constituency rolls....and splits.
"...Obama’s 2008 coalition was always more fragile than Democrats at the time believed, and that there remain obstacles to the John Judis/Ruy Teixeira theory of an Emerging Democratic Majority. Trende’s major point is that all such predictions of enduring partisan majorities (he cites many dating back over the past century and a half) ignore the fact that political coalitions inevitably draw together factions with different interests and ideologies, and frictions within those coalitions inevitably offer opportunities for the other party to regain support."
The Southern Strategy Myth and the Lost Majority
On the one hand, the old-guard Democrats, who were careful to walk the line between radicalism, and centrism, and the new upstarts who wave un-American banners of socialism, anti-white and anti-Jewish bias.
The latter have no respect for the former, as one can see in the attacks on Biden by the Sandersites.
The poor fools who have been trained to vote with the "D" no matter the issues have a choice to make, and are not equipped to do so.
3. Perhaps the handwriting is on the wall in what should be a reliable state for the Democrats, Wisconsin.
"...AP reported in early February, Liberals eye 2020 takeover of Wisconsin Supreme Court:
Wisconsin liberals hope to take a key step this spring toward breaking a long conservative stranglehold on the state’s Supreme Court, in an election that could also serve as a barometer of the political mood in a key presidential swing state.
If the liberal-backed candidate wins the April 2 state Supreme Court race, liberals would be in prime position to take over the court when the next seat comes up in 2020 — during a presidential primary when Democrats expect to benefit from strong turnout.
The bitterly partisan court, which conservatives have controlled since 2008, has upheld several polarizing Republican-backed laws, none more so than former GOP Gov. Scott Walker’s law that essentially eliminated collective bargaining for public workers.
If liberals can win in April and again in 2020, they would have the majority until at least 2025.
Liberals are worried this might mean Trump will win again in Wisconsin in 2020."
4. AND....this election was decided BEFORE AG Barr dropped the bombshell that validated what we on the Right have said for two years:
“Barr Asserts Intelligence Agencies Spied on the Trump Campaign
· April 10, 2019
WASHINGTON — Attorney General William P. Barr said on Wednesday that he would scrutinize the F.B.I.’s investigation of the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia, including whether “spying” conducted by American intelligence agencies on the campaign’s associates had been properly carried out.
“I think spying on a political campaign is a big deal,” Mr. Barr said during testimony before a Senate Appropriations subcommittee, adding that he wanted to look into both “the genesis and the conduct” of the F.B.I. inquiry. He cast his interest as a matter of protecting civil liberties from potential abuse by the government.
“I think spying did occur,” Mr. Barr said. “The question is whether it was adequately predicated. And I’m not suggesting that it wasn’t adequately predicated. But I need to explore that.”
The remarks by the new attorney general — particularly his embrace of the term spying, which is frequently invoked by critics of the Russia investigation — are certain to please President Trump and his allies, who have accused American law enforcement officials of targeting his campaign out of political malice.” Barr Asserts Intelligence Agencies Spied on the Trump Campaign
For clarity:
Difference between Watergate and the Obama Spying? Watergate was a failed attempt by a political party to spy on their political enemies.
