"Poor" people in the US live far better than 95% of people in shitholes that make up 75% of the world's population. Oh, and they're tons fatter.US has one of the highest percentage of people below the poverty line. So US is one of the worst for providing for there citizens compared to other countries...Those dead guys gave us the ability to create the greatest, wealthiest, and strongest country in the world. You don't see hard working Americans making rafts to get to Cuba, it's the other way around.Great... Thanks for showing us who you are....
You would let your fellow citizens die at home but spend Trillions in a Shithole in the middle east....
Ideology has taken over your brain to point of loosing reason... You are worshipping two hundred year old dead guys who by the way expected the Constitution to be updated for modern times...
Nobody is dying at home from starvation unless they wanted to. We have provided for our citizens for many years. The problem however like most social programs is that they are abused. And don't tell me it's rare because we have more than our share of SNAP's people in our grocery stores and I see the abuse almost every time.
As for your I have seen abuse therefore it must be everywhere:
"SNAP fraud is relatively rare, according to available data and reports. ... The most frequently cited measure of fraud is the national retailer trafficking rate, which, estimated that 1.5% of SNAP benefits redeemed from FY2012-FY2014 were trafficked."
Now you can critize the report all you like but please do it with a report that do the same level of diligence to produce...
So it is not make America great... Just make us better than a third world country..."Poor" people in the US live far better than 95% of people in shitholes that make up 75% of the world's population. Oh, and they're tons fatter.US has one of the highest percentage of people below the poverty line. So US is one of the worst for providing for there citizens compared to other countries...Those dead guys gave us the ability to create the greatest, wealthiest, and strongest country in the world. You don't see hard working Americans making rafts to get to Cuba, it's the other way around.Great... Thanks for showing us who you are....
You would let your fellow citizens die at home but spend Trillions in a Shithole in the middle east....
Ideology has taken over your brain to point of loosing reason... You are worshipping two hundred year old dead guys who by the way expected the Constitution to be updated for modern times...
Nobody is dying at home from starvation unless they wanted to. We have provided for our citizens for many years. The problem however like most social programs is that they are abused. And don't tell me it's rare because we have more than our share of SNAP's people in our grocery stores and I see the abuse almost every time.
As for your I have seen abuse therefore it must be everywhere:
"SNAP fraud is relatively rare, according to available data and reports. ... The most frequently cited measure of fraud is the national retailer trafficking rate, which, estimated that 1.5% of SNAP benefits redeemed from FY2012-FY2014 were trafficked."
Now you can critize the report all you like but please do it with a report that do the same level of diligence to produce...
I neither look up or down at European countries, Japan and so on. They have poor people too, but they're not fat. Being a patriot should not be about making fat people fatter to me. I guess I'm not that "woke".So it is not make America great... Just make us better than a third world country..."Poor" people in the US live far better than 95% of people in shitholes that make up 75% of the world's population. Oh, and they're tons fatter.US has one of the highest percentage of people below the poverty line. So US is one of the worst for providing for there citizens compared to other countries...Those dead guys gave us the ability to create the greatest, wealthiest, and strongest country in the world. You don't see hard working Americans making rafts to get to Cuba, it's the other way around.Great... Thanks for showing us who you are....
You would let your fellow citizens die at home but spend Trillions in a Shithole in the middle east....
Ideology has taken over your brain to point of loosing reason... You are worshipping two hundred year old dead guys who by the way expected the Constitution to be updated for modern times...
Nobody is dying at home from starvation unless they wanted to. We have provided for our citizens for many years. The problem however like most social programs is that they are abused. And don't tell me it's rare because we have more than our share of SNAP's people in our grocery stores and I see the abuse almost every time.
As for your I have seen abuse therefore it must be everywhere:
"SNAP fraud is relatively rare, according to available data and reports. ... The most frequently cited measure of fraud is the national retailer trafficking rate, which, estimated that 1.5% of SNAP benefits redeemed from FY2012-FY2014 were trafficked."
Now you can critize the report all you like but please do it with a report that do the same level of diligence to produce...
So you are happy with America looking up to European Countries, Japan, Australia, New Zealand....
Fatter doesn't mean healthier... US cheap food makes people fatter and generally more sick....
In Germany they look after there most vulnerable because they are German, British look after the vulnerable because they are British....
Being a patriot is not about singing an anthem or raising a flag, it is about helping your fellow citizens when in need... We do this to create a better society for our citizens... That is what real patriots do...
Reality "Poor" US citizens have a bad deal when compare to say a place like Germany... By the way Germany has run a surplus for 7 years straight to 2019...
I am not the 1 in need of a job at this time. You are the 1 sucking off the gubnit tit. Thanks for being so lazy you admit you want someone else to find you a job. Just so MAGA.No, just to show that these jobs you say I could get don't exist. If you can't find them, how can anybody?Now your so fucking lazy you want someone else to find you a job. Wow the MAGA in you never ends!!!!
Neither am I. I'm doing just fine.I am not the 1 in need of a job at this time.
We all know! You are sucking off the gubnit tit and loving it!!! All while bitching about others doinh the same that YOU deem unworthy. How very MAGA of you!!!!!Neither am I. I'm doing just fine.I am not the 1 in need of a job at this time.
who said theyre experts and whats that got to do with following the text of it,,,So experts at reading the actual law assigned to that role as per constitution...\Well the Supreme court disagrees with you... But if you think I am wrong, bring a case in front of them...Come on Man yourself....I| don't think you get it... i don't have top deny anything, you have to prove it...Didn't mention Democrats...I didn't advocate it, did I?Did i say that...When were they the most vulnerable?it is not stealing... Economics is a made made construct with flaws...General doesn't mean everyone... Get a fuck dictionary...general means it helps everyone,, this takes from one and gives to another,, thats not general,,How the fuck do you think General Welfare works.....general doesnt mean you take from one group and give to another,,not the governments job to feed hungry people,,, that always results in a weaker society,,,What you mean is:why is the government f̶u̶n̶d̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶p̶r̶i̶v̶a̶t̶e̶ ̶o̶r̶g̶a̶n̶i̶z̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶??
Why is the government feeding hungry citizens?
Wow you missed the part of the constitution about maintaining the general welfare of our nation.
You russian trolls need to learn more about America and our constitution.
Please have the decency to go for a shit on the flag because you don't give a fuck about your fellow citizens....
I can mean everyone but that is a very narrow definition...
By the way
Great... Thanks for showing us who you are....Again, the US Constitution charges our federal authorities with the protection of their people from enemies domestic and foreign. You can argue that Iraq was no real threat to the US, but at the time, neither was Osama.Remember that Iraq war that Republicans lied to get people into it...
GOP and Trump love forcing people to do things as well... Iraq could have cancelled all college loans, housed the homeless and fix the Vets hospitals... And there would be still plenty of change...
GOP just steal big... Trump basically gave China TPP and then took the bribes...
There is nothing in the Constitution that justifies feeding the people, and no, it's not covered under General Welfare. If if was, then the federal government would also be providing houses and cars for all of it's citizens.
You would let your fellow citizens die at home but spend Trillions in a Shithole in the middle east....
Ideology has taken over your brain to point of loosing reason... You are worshipping two hundred year old dead guys who by the way expected the Constitution to be updated for modern times...
its sure doesnt mean stealing from one and giving to another,,,
‘THE TRUE MEASURE OF ANY SOCIETY CAN BE FOUND IN HOW IT TREATS ITS MOST VULNERABLE MEMBERS’ - Mahatma Gandhi...
Nelson Mandela — 'A Nation should not be judged by how it treats its highest citizens, but it's lowest ones'
so youre OK with corp. welfare too??
When is a corporate a member of society?
so you are OK with it,, figures,,,
Listening to what you want to hear...
you didnt deny it,,,
Please show me where i did? Then you can talk about Corp Welfare...
and yet democrats are giving corp. welfare more than ever seen in history,,,
your words dont match your groups actions,,
are you lying???
What group.... I not a member of a tribe or cult....
You are one making claims without any evidence... Where did I advocate corp welfare?
you didnt deny it until you lied about it,,,
You see you made the allegation, it is up to you to prove it...
COME ON MAN!!
you can do better than that,,
You made an allegation, now back it up...
I said we should be judged as a society by how we treat our most vulnerable...
You accused of advocating Corp Welfare...
hate to break it to you buttercup but society doesnt exist based on your opinion,,,
at the fed level all welfare is not authorized,,,
So Keyboard warrior who throws out unproven allegations or Supreme Court?
\
SCOTUS is corrupted with leftist and conservatives,,,
So you don't agree with he constitution...
No, I'm doing things much differently. You commies love to stick with your own kind is all. When people live off the dole paying nothing into the system and having kids they could never afford in the first place, you're all for it. People who were forced into a position and use the system they paid for, now you're against it. Proving once again you commies are not out for the working man, you're out for the illegals and lowlifes, giving credence to my signature.We all know! You are sucking off the gubnit tit and loving it!!! All while bitching about others doinh the same that YOU deem unworthy. How very MAGA of you!!!!!
There is nothing wrong with that. Lawsuits are a part of our medical expenses that we all pay for. While there are few successful ones, the litigation costs tons of money that a doctors malpractice has to pay for which of course increases premiums.Abbott is the sort of person who got rich from jogging in a wind storm and having a property owners tree fall on him.
Then he waged a war against people being able to sue doctors for malpractice.
Those facts tell everyone 100% of what they need to know about Abbott. He is pure evil and irredeemable.
Of course they could interpret the text as it was originally written. Where "we the people" only included white males with money or property.who said theyre experts and whats that got to do with following the text of it,,,
thats why dems want to pack it with more libs cause the cons will rule the con way,,
both sides are corrupt and we need constitutionalist as judges not cons and libs,,
I see youre ignorant on the topic,,Of course they could interpret the text as it was originally written. Where "we the people" only included white males with money or property.who said theyre experts and whats that got to do with following the text of it,,,
thats why dems want to pack it with more libs cause the cons will rule the con way,,
both sides are corrupt and we need constitutionalist as judges not cons and libs,,
Easily debunked:There is nothing wrong with that. Lawsuits are a part of our medical expenses that we all pay for. While there are few successful ones, the litigation costs tons of money that a doctors malpractice has to pay for which of course increases premiums.Abbott is the sort of person who got rich from jogging in a wind storm and having a property owners tree fall on him.
Then he waged a war against people being able to sue doctors for malpractice.
Those facts tell everyone 100% of what they need to know about Abbott. He is pure evil and irredeemable.
It also leads to defensive medicine; the practice of having to see several doctors instead of just one. Unlike years ago where your family doctor took care of most of your ailments, today your family doctor is nothing but a referal service. If you are having problems with your eyes, you need to see an eye specialist. If you have a sore throat, you need to see an ear, nose and throat specialist. Then once you get to those specialists, they run every test under the sun, not because it may tell them something, but to protect themselves in case something goes wrong and you sue them. This all cost us a lot of money.
What we need in our country is a loser pays all law. Sue anybody you want, but if you lose, you have to pay all the costs associated with the person or entity you tried to sue.
Sounds good. How would that have worked out with Trumps 60 election lawsuits?What we need in our country is a loser pays all law. Sue anybody you want, but if you lose, you have to pay all the costs associated with the person or entity you tried to sue.
Not at all. I read Scott V Sandford 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857),I see youre ignorant on the topic,,Of course they could interpret the text as it was originally written. Where "we the people" only included white males with money or property.who said theyre experts and whats that got to do with following the text of it,,,
thats why dems want to pack it with more libs cause the cons will rule the con way,,
both sides are corrupt and we need constitutionalist as judges not cons and libs,,
that was way back when they respected the constitution,, that hasnt happened in decades,,Not at all. I read Scott V Sandford 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857),I see youre ignorant on the topic,,Of course they could interpret the text as it was originally written. Where "we the people" only included white males with money or property.who said theyre experts and whats that got to do with following the text of it,,,
thats why dems want to pack it with more libs cause the cons will rule the con way,,
both sides are corrupt and we need constitutionalist as judges not cons and libs,,
His campaign would have paid.Sounds good. How would that have worked out with Trumps 60 election lawsuits?What we need in our country is a loser pays all law. Sue anybody you want, but if you lose, you have to pay all the costs associated with the person or entity you tried to sue.
Wrong I am not against anyone getting benefits. Simply pointing out YOUR hypocrisy and judgment of others that do. So much MAGA in you it makes me laugh. Get a job freeloading lowlife.No, I'm doing things much differently. You commies love to stick with your own kind is all. When people live off the dole paying nothing into the system and having kids they could never afford in the first place, you're all for it. People who were forced into a position and use the system they paid for, now you're against it. Proving once again you commies are not out for the working man, you're out for the illegals and lowlifes, giving credence to my signature.We all know! You are sucking off the gubnit tit and loving it!!! All while bitching about others doinh the same that YOU deem unworthy. How very MAGA of you!!!!!
Actually the decision says just what I said, that "we the people" only included white males with money or property.that was way back when they respected the constitution,, that hasnt happened in decades,,Not at all. I read Scott V Sandford 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857),I see youre ignorant on the topic,,Of course they could interpret the text as it was originally written. Where "we the people" only included white males with money or property.who said theyre experts and whats that got to do with following the text of it,,,
thats why dems want to pack it with more libs cause the cons will rule the con way,,
both sides are corrupt and we need constitutionalist as judges not cons and libs,,
Sweet.His campaign would have paid.Sounds good. How would that have worked out with Trumps 60 election lawsuits?What we need in our country is a loser pays all law. Sue anybody you want, but if you lose, you have to pay all the costs associated with the person or entity you tried to sue.
