It is a lot less of a gamble than continuing to spend
No, it's not. The reason is because the only way to reverse economic contraction is to increase spending. Think about what you're saying;
you want to achieve high growth by...cutting growth.
Why not shoot yourself in the foot before you run a marathon while you're at it? Yeah, too much foot...that's the reason why you can't improve your marathon time. Better shoot that foot, that way you'll run faster.
Like I said, I'm not for the tax cuts nor the added spending, your terrorism hyperbole is just that.
No, what you're for is deliberately causing a recession to achieve the same level of growth you had before instigating that economic contraction. And when you reduce spending and contract the economy, you
exacerbate deficits. So you're taking three steps back to take one step forward. How many steps does that leave you behind?
As far as raising my taxes, according to what has been published, according to the tax policy institute I will see a reduction in my taxes, as I am middle class.
You'll see a slight reduction for 2018, but by 2025, the rates will rise and by 2027, you'll be paying more than you pay now. That's what the JCT says in their study. Also, not factored into that is the spike in health care costs (JCT estimates 10% premium increase - higher than Obamacare's premium increases) that will "eat up" that tax cut you think you got. In fact, for most Medicare patients, the COLA to SS won't even cover the increase in premiums Medicare has already started.