GOP tax bill: AT&T, Boeing among corporations rewarding employees

[Lewdog]

MOST middle class employees got a very small tax cut... and it is only temporary, unlike the corporate tax cut.

ALL middle class people got a tax cut. And you go ahead and run the democrats on making sure that tax cut doesn't stay. I dare you.

It doesn't stay. It isn't built in to last as long as the corporate cuts.

Maybe you democrats should have jumped on board and made them permanent. Maybe when you run on raising those taxes back to previous levels there won't be enough of you to even matter.

I'm not a Democrat. Just because someone doesn't suck on Trump's ball sack doesn't mean they are a Democrat.

I'll suck on his ballsack.......
and if youre not a democrat, it's a socialist/communist then.....which they're all the same in reality.

Wrong.

 

[Lewdog]

That's not what I said.

Feel free to clarify.

No... see you got it backwards. The Tax cut was meant so that companies could SAVE money on paying taxes to increase the wages of the employees so that they made more money, and thus also paid more in taxes to help make up for the taxes that big corporations aren't paying. That's the whole idea that the corporate tax cuts would generate more taxes from other sources.

No the entire idea was cooperation's wouldn't hide trillions of dollars in the Cayman islands..

Wrong, if that was the case then they would be trying to make it so that they have to claim that money already. The government KNOWS they aren't reporting that money, have even offered HUGE breaks on the amount they will forgive if the companies get up to date on what they owe, and the companies STILL aren't paying it. Yet instead of the government doing anything about it, they just give in and give them more tax breaks.

If this is true, why didn't Obama go after them?

Obama made them an offer to pay their back taxes for a very small percentage of what they owed.

Why he didn't go after them I don't know. But only one Presidential candidate was aggressive about doing something about it, and the amount of money that would have been brought back to pay towards the debt is unreal.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Again you display the FACT that you know so much that isn't true. I was never in any union and never have been. Raises should be performance based and not just handed out. That leads to mediocrity which is what all the regressive socialists love.

So you worked at a private prison? That's even worse...

yeah because merit is bad thing to reward....better to reward seniority or some other non productive factor!

I bet you have absolutely no clue why private prisons are bad.

I bet you have no clue as to why public schools blow dick.

That is a horrible, and unrelated answer.

You criticized my post about private prisons... now do you have a clue why private prisons suck?

you've got us...you want to tell us, so spit it out.

I looked this up...
Private prison - Wikipedia

now this one is interesting
In the wake of the escape of three murderers from the minimum/medium security Kingman Prison, Arizona operated by Management and Training Corporation (MTC), and its gruesome aftermath, Arizona Attorney General and gubernatorial candidate Terry Goddard said "I believe a big part of our problem is that the very violent inmates, like the three that escaped, ended up getting reclassified [as a lower risk] quickly and sent to private prisons that were just not up to the job".[42] The private prison had inadequate patrols and prisoner movement, excessive false alarms, a lax culture, and inconsistencies in visitor screening procedures.[43]


why in the **** are murders in min security prisons.....you democrats ***** about crime, but don't want to punish criminals......what the ****.....they should be in max security getting nightsticks shoved up their asses each day.....MINIMUM SECURITY.....what the ****!!!!!!!

 

[buckeye45_73]

Non stop crying. lol. And now you want raises just handed out. What ever happened to working harder and deserving your raise? Never heard of that did you?

Raises don't just come from job performance. I'd think someone that worked at a prison and more than likely was part of a union that got you yearly raises through the contract despite many of the co-workers not being worth a shit, would know that.

Again you display the FACT that you know so much that isn't true. I was never in any union and never have been. Raises should be performance based and not just handed out. That leads to mediocrity which is what all the regressive socialists love.

So you worked at a private prison? That's even worse...

Raises should be merit based and not handed out like candy because the socialists want it.

Wrong. Raises should be based on cost of living, and if someone isn't doing a good job, then they shouldn't have THAT job. That's plain common sense.

Wrong, raises should be given based on the type of work, merit and what the company can afford. cost of living has nothing to do with it.....sorry man

 

[Lewdog]

So you worked at a private prison? That's even worse...

yeah because merit is bad thing to reward....better to reward seniority or some other non productive factor!

I bet you have absolutely no clue why private prisons are bad.

I bet you have no clue as to why public schools blow dick.

That is a horrible, and unrelated answer.

You criticized my post about private prisons... now do you have a clue why private prisons suck?

you've got us...you want to tell us, so spit it out.

I looked this up...
Private prison - Wikipedia

now this one is interesting
In the wake of the escape of three murderers from the minimum/medium security Kingman Prison, Arizona operated by Management and Training Corporation (MTC), and its gruesome aftermath, Arizona Attorney General and gubernatorial candidate Terry Goddard said "I believe a big part of our problem is that the very violent inmates, like the three that escaped, ended up getting reclassified [as a lower risk] quickly and sent to private prisons that were just not up to the job".[42] The private prison had inadequate patrols and prisoner movement, excessive false alarms, a lax culture, and inconsistencies in visitor screening procedures.[43]


why in the **** are murders in min security prisons.....you democrats ***** about crime, but don't want to punish criminals......what the ****.....they should be in max security getting nightsticks shoved up their asses each day.....MINIMUM SECURITY.....what the ****!!!!!!!

It's a pretty simple answer, and all it takes is common sense.

What's the number one driving force behind a private prison?

 

[Lewdog]

Raises don't just come from job performance. I'd think someone that worked at a prison and more than likely was part of a union that got you yearly raises through the contract despite many of the co-workers not being worth a shit, would know that.

Again you display the FACT that you know so much that isn't true. I was never in any union and never have been. Raises should be performance based and not just handed out. That leads to mediocrity which is what all the regressive socialists love.

So you worked at a private prison? That's even worse...

Raises should be merit based and not handed out like candy because the socialists want it.

Wrong. Raises should be based on cost of living, and if someone isn't doing a good job, then they shouldn't have THAT job. That's plain common sense.

Wrong, raises should be given based on the type of work, merit and what the company can afford. cost of living has nothing to do with it.....sorry man

Wrong. Raises should have to do with company profitability, cost of living, and job retention.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Feel free to clarify.

No... see you got it backwards. The Tax cut was meant so that companies could SAVE money on paying taxes to increase the wages of the employees so that they made more money, and thus also paid more in taxes to help make up for the taxes that big corporations aren't paying. That's the whole idea that the corporate tax cuts would generate more taxes from other sources.

No the entire idea was cooperation's wouldn't hide trillions of dollars in the Cayman islands..

Wrong, if that was the case then they would be trying to make it so that they have to claim that money already. The government KNOWS they aren't reporting that money, have even offered HUGE breaks on the amount they will forgive if the companies get up to date on what they owe, and the companies STILL aren't paying it. Yet instead of the government doing anything about it, they just give in and give them more tax breaks.

If this is true, why didn't Obama go after them?

Obama made them an offer to pay their back taxes for a very small percentage of what they owed.

Why he didn't go after them I don't know. But only one Presidential candidate was aggressive about doing something about it, and the amount of money that would have been brought back to pay towards the debt is unreal.

and he is, he has tax cuts, he'll work trade policy and then for the piece de resitance, the penalty for not taking the deals earlier..

I look at it like Palestine. They were given every effort to obtain piece but they denied it every time, finally Trump said, ok, well we're moving to Jerusalem, you missed your chance on that. He'll do it with the overseas cash. Give them a chance and if not, they will regret it.

 

[buckeye45_73]

The sky was supposed to fall.

Instead money fell from the sky.

AWESOME POST!

 

[Lewdog]

No... see you got it backwards. The Tax cut was meant so that companies could SAVE money on paying taxes to increase the wages of the employees so that they made more money, and thus also paid more in taxes to help make up for the taxes that big corporations aren't paying. That's the whole idea that the corporate tax cuts would generate more taxes from other sources.

No the entire idea was cooperation's wouldn't hide trillions of dollars in the Cayman islands..

Wrong, if that was the case then they would be trying to make it so that they have to claim that money already. The government KNOWS they aren't reporting that money, have even offered HUGE breaks on the amount they will forgive if the companies get up to date on what they owe, and the companies STILL aren't paying it. Yet instead of the government doing anything about it, they just give in and give them more tax breaks.

If this is true, why didn't Obama go after them?

Obama made them an offer to pay their back taxes for a very small percentage of what they owed.

Why he didn't go after them I don't know. But only one Presidential candidate was aggressive about doing something about it, and the amount of money that would have been brought back to pay towards the debt is unreal.

and he is, he has tax cuts, he'll work trade policy and then for the piece de resitance, the penalty for not taking the deals earlier..

I look at it like Palestine. They were given every effort to obtain piece but they denied it every time, finally Trump said, ok, well we're moving to Jerusalem, you missed your chance on that. He'll do it with the overseas cash. Give them a chance and if not, they will regret it.

Trump did it just to troll the rest of the world... and because his son and law is a Jew.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Look the Republican party is going to burn down with this. Large Corporations went from 35% down to 21%. There is nothing in this bill that requires large corporations to give their employees bonus's or raises.

We are talking about American corporations, like Big Pharma, Oil and others, and many of whom have shipped jobs overseas.

This entire thread is about a major corporation giving out bonuses to their employees based on this tax cut, you idjit.

Plus this bill is very unpopular with the overwhelming majority in this country. There have been protesters at every Republican congressional district across the nation.
Poll: Majority oppose GOP tax-reform bill

Of course it is. It's received nonstop negative coverage by the propagandist media from the get go, not to mention the lies coming from your pals in the Democratic Party. Why is it a surprise that the public would have a negative view of it?

So expect to see a Democrat House and Senate in 2018.

Maybe we will, but the election is 11 months away and a lot can happen. If the 2018 economy is roaring as some people are predicting the Democrats may have a hard time explaining their opposition to it. Time will tell.

In the meantime, I'll tell you the same thing I told the others, sweet cheeks. If you don't want that extra money in your paycheck then you can give it back

Bureau of the Fiscal Service - Gifts to the U.S. Government

None of you whiners, of course, will do this. You'll take the benefit of the cut and still ***** about it like the dishonest and dishonorable hypocrites you are.

What all the leftists forget is----->

1. Coolidge tax cut, economy roared!

2. Kennedy tax cut, economy roared!

3. Clinton capital gains tax cut, economy roared!

4. GW tax cut, economy roared......till it collapsed, thanks to Fannie and Freddie that the left controlled, which is why Barney Frank got the hell out of town.

With 3 of the 4 examples listed above, the economy was in the tank, and it reignited it. With the other example under Clinton, the economy was pretty decent when he cut the capital gains taxes, and the economy almost instantly went absolutely crazy with massive, quick, growth.

That is what the leftists fear, especially after 8 years of Obama, in which the leftists of every strip proclaimed that 2% growth or less, was the new normal.

Does everyone here realize that once the tax breaks are in effect, that if the economy hits 4% for even 1 quarter, the leftists will be unable to get themselves elected dog catcher!

How do we know this?

Look back at Reagan and what happened. Even Democrats voted for him as their paychecks grew. But here is the kicker---------> today unlike then, almost 1/3rd of the electorate are self identified independents. They do not have internal ideological fights like we do. You show them 4% growth that according to the Democrats would NOT HAPPEN AGAIN FOR DECADES that will played repeatedly in commercials, along with more take home cash to boot; and it is Katie bar the door on Democratic ambitions to take over anything but the outhouses in National Forests.

And that is why they FEAR this tax cut. They can NOT point to one time they have not worked in the federal government, nor can they point to one time that LESS money flowed into the treasury because of them. They know they are in deep trouble, and I mean deep-DEEP, trouble. They had hoped the same thing would happen to this, that happened to the Obamacare repeal.......because they know the truth---------> when this works, as it has done each and every time it has been tried, unlike Socialism; the American people will be MORE inclined to pursue other policies, that rebuke what they.....the leftists, have done.

Add to that the other bombshells coming about what they pulled off when Obama was in the Whitehouse that were basically, UNAMERICAN...........and you are going to see a sea of change that will give Republicans......hopefully mostly CONSERVATIVES and not RINO's, the ability to put this country back where the founders intended it to be, under governance that originally made this, America, the envy of the modern world!

Moo
This is a major corporation tax cut. 35 down to 21%. We haven't seen the final bill or the complete details of this bill, but judging from the protesters across this nation it's not going to play out well for the Republican party.

The other tax cuts were done to stimulate a stagnant economy, which were not in. We're close to full employment now. It wasn't necessary. Now was the time to pay down debt not give it away.

And as we all should know by now what the government gives with the right hand they usually take that and more away with the left. And I imagine there's a lot of that in this bill we haven't seen yet.

While large corporations have a lot to celebrate tonight, we will have to see what they do with this new found wealth, but it's not going to stop jobs from going overseas. I imagine stock market buybacks are real popular right now.

What protestors, the democrat protest machine was so lethargic on this Nancy Pelosi didn't even show up to a meeting in the Capital......you guys are too busy worrying about the Russia hoax and confederate statues.....

 

[buckeye45_73]

No the entire idea was cooperation's wouldn't hide trillions of dollars in the Cayman islands..

Wrong, if that was the case then they would be trying to make it so that they have to claim that money already. The government KNOWS they aren't reporting that money, have even offered HUGE breaks on the amount they will forgive if the companies get up to date on what they owe, and the companies STILL aren't paying it. Yet instead of the government doing anything about it, they just give in and give them more tax breaks.

If this is true, why didn't Obama go after them?

Obama made them an offer to pay their back taxes for a very small percentage of what they owed.

Why he didn't go after them I don't know. But only one Presidential candidate was aggressive about doing something about it, and the amount of money that would have been brought back to pay towards the debt is unreal.

and he is, he has tax cuts, he'll work trade policy and then for the piece de resitance, the penalty for not taking the deals earlier..

I look at it like Palestine. They were given every effort to obtain piece but they denied it every time, finally Trump said, ok, well we're moving to Jerusalem, you missed your chance on that. He'll do it with the overseas cash. Give them a chance and if not, they will regret it.

Trump did it just to troll the rest of the world... and because his son and law is a Jew.

I'm sure he did, but he also put the world on notice, either work with us or we'll just do what we want. Palestine didn't believe him, just like the wall, it's coming. All those that said it was a prop or bullshit, it's going to be built.....Schumer can either get something out of the deal or just whine and watch it being built and get nothing.

 

[Wyatt earp]

No the entire idea was cooperation's wouldn't hide trillions of dollars in the Cayman islands..

Wrong, if that was the case then they would be trying to make it so that they have to claim that money already. The government KNOWS they aren't reporting that money, have even offered HUGE breaks on the amount they will forgive if the companies get up to date on what they owe, and the companies STILL aren't paying it. Yet instead of the government doing anything about it, they just give in and give them more tax breaks.

If this is true, why didn't Obama go after them?

Obama made them an offer to pay their back taxes for a very small percentage of what they owed.

Why he didn't go after them I don't know. But only one Presidential candidate was aggressive about doing something about it, and the amount of money that would have been brought back to pay towards the debt is unreal.

and he is, he has tax cuts, he'll work trade policy and then for the piece de resitance, the penalty for not taking the deals earlier..

I look at it like Palestine. They were given every effort to obtain piece but they denied it every time, finally Trump said, ok, well we're moving to Jerusalem, you missed your chance on that. He'll do it with the overseas cash. Give them a chance and if not, they will regret it.

Trump did it just to troll the rest of the world... and because his son and law is a Jew.

The truth keeps coming out about you a little at a time ..( you do know we keep track of single posters right) tell us more tell us more..

 

[buckeye45_73]

This cannot be true.

Liberals do not lie and they told us that the evil Corporations would use all the tax break money for themselves...whatever the **** that means.

These idiots have very poor business acumen, clearly.

Is it a good thing that AT&T is giving employees a $1000 Non demoninational winter season bonus because of the tax cut?

It seems like a good thing. Can a liberal explain to me how it’s bad for those getting the $1000 bonus?

I think it's because they don't know what a business is. They think people start it to create jobs or social justice.....they're clueless

oh and the main thing is projection. The reason they say that, is because that's what they would do, because they don't understand to concept of investing in a business.

 

[Dragonlady]

Oh Wow! Awesome... that's ONE company out of millions.

Yeah, those 200k employees would have been much better off without that extra $1,000 + in their pockets.

Let me leave this video right here.

You are free to give your tax cuts back if you disapprove.

Let me leave this link right here.

Bureau of the Fiscal Service - Gifts to the U.S. Government

You remember that $400+ one time stimulus payment that Obama gave out? Yeah well it was proven it really didn't do much. Sure what AT&T did is nice on the surface, but a raise that last longer would be a whole lot better.

And see, this is why the left needs to be shut out of the room with the door locked when proposing economic policy in Washington. You people talk out both sides of your ass. You piss, moan, and ***** nonstop about corporate greed on the one hand, then on the other when a major corporate entity spreads the wealth among the rank and file, exactly what you claim to want, you piss, moan, and ***** about that too. You people are never satisfied no matter what you are given. You are perpetual whiners and complainers and that is why you are to be ignored by society.

They’re not spreading the wealth to the rank and file. Raises would do that.

The amount paid out to employees is a drop in the bucket compared to the amount being paid out as dividends.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Wrong, if that was the case then they would be trying to make it so that they have to claim that money already. The government KNOWS they aren't reporting that money, have even offered HUGE breaks on the amount they will forgive if the companies get up to date on what they owe, and the companies STILL aren't paying it. Yet instead of the government doing anything about it, they just give in and give them more tax breaks.

If this is true, why didn't Obama go after them?

Obama made them an offer to pay their back taxes for a very small percentage of what they owed.

Why he didn't go after them I don't know. But only one Presidential candidate was aggressive about doing something about it, and the amount of money that would have been brought back to pay towards the debt is unreal.

and he is, he has tax cuts, he'll work trade policy and then for the piece de resitance, the penalty for not taking the deals earlier..

I look at it like Palestine. They were given every effort to obtain piece but they denied it every time, finally Trump said, ok, well we're moving to Jerusalem, you missed your chance on that. He'll do it with the overseas cash. Give them a chance and if not, they will regret it.

Trump did it just to troll the rest of the world... and because his son and law is a Jew.

The truth keeps coming out about you a little at a time ..( you do know we keep track of single posters right) tell us more tell us more..

Damn Olivia Newton John was hot.....that woman was beautiful...and honestly she's not bad looking at her age now......huba huba

 

[buckeye45_73]

ALL middle class people got a tax cut. And you go ahead and run the democrats on making sure that tax cut doesn't stay. I dare you.

It doesn't stay. It isn't built in to last as long as the corporate cuts.

Maybe you democrats should have jumped on board and made them permanent. Maybe when you run on raising those taxes back to previous levels there won't be enough of you to even matter.

I'm not a Democrat. Just because someone doesn't suck on Trump's ball sack doesn't mean they are a Democrat.

I'll suck on his ballsack.......
and if youre not a democrat, it's a socialist/communist then.....which they're all the same in reality.

Wrong.

I love these games, you're not a democrat, not a republican, not a commie or a socialist.......ooooh riddles.........you're a fascist?

 

[Lewdog]

Wrong, if that was the case then they would be trying to make it so that they have to claim that money already. The government KNOWS they aren't reporting that money, have even offered HUGE breaks on the amount they will forgive if the companies get up to date on what they owe, and the companies STILL aren't paying it. Yet instead of the government doing anything about it, they just give in and give them more tax breaks.

If this is true, why didn't Obama go after them?

Obama made them an offer to pay their back taxes for a very small percentage of what they owed.

Why he didn't go after them I don't know. But only one Presidential candidate was aggressive about doing something about it, and the amount of money that would have been brought back to pay towards the debt is unreal.

and he is, he has tax cuts, he'll work trade policy and then for the piece de resitance, the penalty for not taking the deals earlier..

I look at it like Palestine. They were given every effort to obtain piece but they denied it every time, finally Trump said, ok, well we're moving to Jerusalem, you missed your chance on that. He'll do it with the overseas cash. Give them a chance and if not, they will regret it.

Trump did it just to troll the rest of the world... and because his son and law is a Jew.

The truth keeps coming out about you a little at a time ..( you do know we keep track of single posters right) tell us more tell us more..

What? His son and law is a Jew... I mean is that a lie?

 

[buckeye45_73]

Oh Wow! Awesome... that's ONE company out of millions.

Yeah, those 200k employees would have been much better off without that extra $1,000 + in their pockets.

Let me leave this video right here.

You are free to give your tax cuts back if you disapprove.

Let me leave this link right here.

Bureau of the Fiscal Service - Gifts to the U.S. Government

You remember that $400+ one time stimulus payment that Obama gave out? Yeah well it was proven it really didn't do much. Sure what AT&T did is nice on the surface, but a raise that last longer would be a whole lot better.

And see, this is why the left needs to be shut out of the room with the door locked when proposing economic policy in Washington. You people talk out both sides of your ass. You piss, moan, and ***** nonstop about corporate greed on the one hand, then on the other when a major corporate entity spreads the wealth among the rank and file, exactly what you claim to want, you piss, moan, and ***** about that too. You people are never satisfied no matter what you are given. You are perpetual whiners and complainers and that is why you are to be ignored by society.

They’re not spreading the wealth to the rank and file. Raises would do that.

The amount paid out to employees is a drop in the bucket compared to the amount being paid out as dividends.

Ok first how do you know all that without knowing the finances?

Second, what should they do, I cant wait for this....

 

[buckeye45_73]

If this is true, why didn't Obama go after them?

Obama made them an offer to pay their back taxes for a very small percentage of what they owed.

Why he didn't go after them I don't know. But only one Presidential candidate was aggressive about doing something about it, and the amount of money that would have been brought back to pay towards the debt is unreal.

and he is, he has tax cuts, he'll work trade policy and then for the piece de resitance, the penalty for not taking the deals earlier..

I look at it like Palestine. They were given every effort to obtain piece but they denied it every time, finally Trump said, ok, well we're moving to Jerusalem, you missed your chance on that. He'll do it with the overseas cash. Give them a chance and if not, they will regret it.

Trump did it just to troll the rest of the world... and because his son and law is a Jew.

The truth keeps coming out about you a little at a time ..( you do know we keep track of single posters right) tell us more tell us more..

What? His son and law is a Jew... I mean is that a lie?

No we know that, and his son was a democrat.......holy shit.....jerry Nadler is running the trump presidency......noooooooooooo!

 

[Wyatt earp]

Wrong, if that was the case then they would be trying to make it so that they have to claim that money already. The government KNOWS they aren't reporting that money, have even offered HUGE breaks on the amount they will forgive if the companies get up to date on what they owe, and the companies STILL aren't paying it. Yet instead of the government doing anything about it, they just give in and give them more tax breaks.

If this is true, why didn't Obama go after them?

Obama made them an offer to pay their back taxes for a very small percentage of what they owed.

Why he didn't go after them I don't know. But only one Presidential candidate was aggressive about doing something about it, and the amount of money that would have been brought back to pay towards the debt is unreal.

and he is, he has tax cuts, he'll work trade policy and then for the piece de resitance, the penalty for not taking the deals earlier..

I look at it like Palestine. They were given every effort to obtain piece but they denied it every time, finally Trump said, ok, well we're moving to Jerusalem, you missed your chance on that. He'll do it with the overseas cash. Give them a chance and if not, they will regret it.

Trump did it just to troll the rest of the world... and because his son and law is a Jew.

I'm sure he did, but he also put the world on notice, either work with us or we'll just do what we want. Palestine didn't believe him, just like the wall, it's coming. All those that said it was a prop or bullshit, it's going to be built.....Schumer can either get something out of the deal or just whine and watch it being built and get nothing.

Do you know what's so cool about Trump and Nikki ..he let's her do what ever she wants ...even if she pisses him off..


But he came to her rescue...


That's what I like ...