Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Weasel out?? Here is a FACT..IRAQ was much better off with Saddam in power. Now, that area is just a piece of shit that no one would want to venture into. And it will stay that way for a very long time. Thanks to George W Bush.
Instead of using all of our money on this war and weakening our military resources, we should be securing our borders and securing our ports and making our airlines safer. Instead of invading IRAQ we should have devoted all of our attention to keeping the lunatics out of the country instead of going over to IRAQ and causing complete and utter chaos. Which is what IRAQ is now. Pure ANARCHY.
Way to go George. Nice Job in IRAQ, what a success it has been and the US has benefited greatly from it.. <<./Sarcasm.>>
Weasel out?? Here is a FACT..IRAQ was much better off with Saddam in power. Now, that area is just a piece of shit that no one would want to venture into. And it will stay that way for a very long time. Thanks to George W Bush.
Instead of using all of our money on this war and weakening our military resources, we should be securing our borders and securing our ports and making our airlines safer. Instead of invading IRAQ we should have devoted all of our attention to keeping the lunatics out of the country instead of going over to IRAQ and causing complete and utter chaos. Which is what IRAQ is now. Pure ANARCHY.
Way to go George. Nice Job in IRAQ, what a success it has been and the US has benefited greatly from it.. <<./Sarcasm.>>
Another voice from the surrender crowd
And I thought libs actually cared about the oppressed, the down trodden, and those who have their right violated
Since the people of Iraq can't vote for them, the libs don't give a shit about them
why does your compassionate conservatism not apply to Darfur? Not enough oil, perhaps?
Funny who lisb want to go there and stop the slaughter- but not Iraq
People in Iraq not dark enough to warrent support from the left?
nice avoidance of the question. you and I both know that the reason the Bush administration does not care as much about Darfur as they do Iraq is summed up in oil and skin color.
Yea, that is the libs talking point on Darfur
why then, does the Bush administration put so much time and effort and military manpower into Iraq and so little into Darfur?
Do you have an answer for that, or will you tapdance away again?
What terrorist threat is in Darfur?
but just up above, you said it was about stopping the slaughter.
are you changing your tune to which you tapdance?
I said the libs want to stop the slaughter in Darfur - but they not in Iraq
and therefore, in contrast, conservatives want to stop the slaughter in Iraq but NOT in Darfur?
and AGAIN. Here is the question:
why do you think there is any real chance for the Iraqi military to remain a cohesive unit upon our departure and not split into sunni and shiite militias?
what is the basis for your unbridled optimism?
Pointing out the double standards of the left is getting to you
the hypocrisy of the right is profound.
and oddly enough, you failed to answer yet another question.
RSR's standard M.O.
I am sure libs will be all for going to Darfur to help - until Pres Bush says we should
Much like the surge in Iraq
and AGAIN. Here is the question:
why do you think there is any real chance for the Iraqi military to remain a cohesive unit upon our departure and not split into sunni and shiite militias?
what is the basis for your unbridled optimism?
but republicans aren't. no oil and black skin equals no help from the right.
Plus, libs have placed their political future in surrender
you realize, of course, that that makes zero sense. Why do you think that anyone would want to surrender to our enemies and think that such action would help their "political future"... or any other kind of future?
but republicans aren't. no oil and black skin equals no help from the right.
