GOP Rep. Madison Cawthorn Warns Of ‘Bloodshed’ While Repeating False Election Claims

[MinTrut]

Your trolling has earned you a permanent ignore. Bye...

Another Democrat who can't deal with the truth, and projects their own trolling.

I shall deeply miss interacting with so fine a poster.

 

[MinTrut]

The Nazis also accused the liberals/jews of doing what they were doing themselves, in order to justify their brownshirt violence.

Exactly; proto-Democrats.

Fascist scum like you isn't anything new in history.

Pure projection.

Antifascists put you down once, and we'll do it again.

See above.

 

[Lakhota]

So then change the electoral system to Proportional Representation.

Why? Give us some details...

 

[mamooth]

Exactly; proto-Democrats.

Fraudboi, are you ready to present your evidence of election fraud that you claim to have?

Of course not. You make everything up. You're just a sad perv who gets off on lying and trolling.

 

[Oddball]

Sure you do, that's why you're always parroting crap from one of the most un-American POS tabloids in the country. The huffypuffy post is lower than raunchy madcow, and that's saying something.

.

Because he himself is an un-American POS.

 

[MinTrut]

Fraudboi, are you ready to present your evidence of election fraud that you claim to have?

Feel free to Google when you're ready.

Of course not.

See above.

You make everything up.

Projection.

You're just a sad perv who gets off on lying and trolling.

More projection.

 

[mamooth]

One-termer.

From your lack of cirticism of the ongoing Trump cult violence and calls for more violence, can we take it you also support further violent fascist coup attempts?

Of course we can. Most Trump cultists at least hope for more violence from their side, with some hoping more than others. You're at the upper end of that scale.

Needless to say, you don't see liberals calling for or supporting violence. Only the fascist right does that.

 

[Lakhota]

Cawthorn has publicly admitted that the election "was not fraudulent".

 

[Oddball]

From your lack of cirticism of the ongoing Trump cult violence and calls for more violence, can we take it you also support further violent fascist coup attempts?

Of course we can. Most Trump cultists at least hope for more violence from their side, with some hoping more than others. You're at the upper end of that scale.

Needless to say, you don't see liberals calling for or supporting violence. Only the fascist right does that.

GFY, Kooky Kat.

 

[OKTexas]

Because he himself is an un-American POS.

Careful you might find your way to permanent iggy, wouldn't that be tragic. Of course only pussies use it anyway.

 

[mamooth]

Feel free to Google when you're ready.

When asked for evidence, saying "Look it up!" is almost universally seen as an admission that you have no evidence.

Understand that we have extensively researched the history of fascism, and all of the various personality disorders, so we understand what drives Trump cultists.

 

[MinTrut]

Cawthorn has publicly admitted that the election "was not fraudulent".

Ultimately irrelevant truth-wise.

It was massively fraudulent.

 

[MinTrut]

Careful you might find your way to permanent iggy, wouldn't that be tragic. Of course only pussies use it anyway.

Turbo-pussies.

 

[JLW]

Cawthorn has publicly admitted that the election "was not fraudulent".

Cawthorne is just another slime Trumpist politician spouting the election fraud lie for the sheep so they continue to send him money and give him votes. He is the ultimate sleazeball because he has admitted the truth that the election was fair. He knows better. He is just the low of the low.

 

[Lakhota]

Since Cawthorn has publicly admitted that the election "was not fraudulent" on January 24, 2021 - why is he still advocating for "bloodshed"? What's his game?

 

[MinTrut]

When asked for evidence, saying "Look it up!" is almost universally seen as an admission that you have no evidence.

And yet the truth remains the truth - go figure.

Understand that we have extensively researched the history of fascism,

"We?"

And *you* have?

Was it like looking in a mirror?

and all of the various personality disorders,

See above.

so we understand what drives Trump cultists.

You're a Trump cultist?

I'm not a Trump supporter, nor a conservative, nor a Republican, so I have no idea why you're spewing this nonsense at me.

 

[MinTrut]

Since Cawthorn has publicly admitted that the election "was not fraudulent" on January 24, 2021 - why is he still advocating for "bloodshed"? What's his game?

The lesson to be learned:

Massively fraudulent elections have consequences.

 

[JLW]

Since Cawthorn has publicly admitted that the election "was not fraudulent" on January 24, 2021 - why is he still advocating for "bloodshed"? What's his game?

He lies Because it benefits his own self-interest.

And perhaps he is like most Trumpist politicians and is just too cowardly to stand up to the election fraud lie.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Why? Give us some details...

The countries with the least corruption use Proportional Representation. It's not a coincidence, Proportional Representation leads to a more open system.

In Germany they vote PR and FPTP on the same day. In 2017 the CDU/CSU (equivalent of the Republicans) gained 37.2% of the vote with FPTP and 77% of the seats.

With Proportional Representation they gained 33% of the vote, 4.2% chose to vote for another party because they didn't feel restricted by FPTP's limits. And they got 34.7% of the seats.

Which is fairer? 33% of people getting 34.7% of the seats, or 4.2% feeling they have to vote CDU/CSU when they'd prefer to vote for a smaller party and then 77% of the seats go to this party anyway?

The FDP, center right party got 7% of the votes with FPTP, and they got zero seats, simply because the system said "no". With PR they got 80 seats with 10.7% of the vote, or 11.2% of the seats. Why should 10.7% of the population get ignored because the system says "no"?

Also Germany has 6 political parties. This is because they have a 5% cut off. Meaning any party with less than 5% gets no seats. They could still get FPTP seats though, but it's harder to get FPTP seats.

In Denmark they have a 2% cut off, and they have 10 political parties.

In the US you have a farmer in Wyoming and a farmer in California. Perhaps they feel the same about policies. But in California the farmer will get totally ignored. It's the largest Republican state (at the 2020 presidential election at least) and all the Republicans got ignored at the presidential election.

But with PR the Wyoming farmer and Californian farmer could vote for the same party and their vote would count the same as everyone else's vote. Perhaps only one person in Wyoming wants to vote for this party, his vote still counts. He doesn't get drowned out by those around him.

You then have sensible politics. Instead of Democrats trying to attract more than 50% of people, parties would focus on core areas. Farmers, urban areas, liberals, fascists, whatever. They'd represent these people properly, if they didn't..... they'd get kicked out.

In German (again), they have the AfD. The AfD, a further right party, was founded in 2013. In that year they won 4.7% of the vote, not enough to get over the threshold, but a decent number of votes.
In 2017 they got 12.6% of the vote and became the third largest party taking a lot of votes away from the CDU/CSU (who had 41.5% of the vote in 2013 and then 33% on 2017). They got 91 seats.

In the UK, which has FPTP only, UKIP, a further right party, was founded in 1993. By 2015 they managed to get 12.6% of the vote (how ironic) and got one seat.

So, in Germany when people get fed up with a political party, they feel they can vote someone else and their voice will be heard. It means that politicians have to listen to the people, and they have to be on the ball.

With FPTP they don't need to, it takes small parties a long time to gain enough support for people to feel like they're not wasting their vote. Because when 12.6% of people vote for you and you get one seat, and almost no voice, but the Tories, who a lot of people wanted to punish, go on to form the government, only because the system says "yes", it's ridiculous.

Question is, who do you want to decide who represents you? You, or the system?

 

[meaner gene]

Cawthorn has publicly admitted that the election "was not fraudulent".

GOP Sen. Ron Johnson Concedes Trump Lost His State

I saw a clip where Johnson explained to one of his voters how Trump under performed in Wisconsin compared to the other republicans on the ballot.