GOP lawmaker: Aiding minors' transgender surgery should be a felony

[Deplorable Yankee]

GOP lawmaker: Aiding minors' transgender surgery should be a felony

BY ARIS FOLLEY7,049
TWEET SHARE MORE


Medical professionals in Georgia could face felony charges for helping minors undergo gender transition under legislation being drafted by a GOP lawmaker in the state, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports.

Under the legislation being proposed by State Rep. Ginny Ehrhart (R), medical professionals in Georgia could be charged with a felony for performing a number of procedures designed to help minors with gender transition, such as mastectomies, vasectomies, “castration and other forms of genital mutilization.”

Ehrhart said that the legislation, if passed, would also prohibit prescribing “puberty-blocking drugs to stop or delay normal puberty and cross-sex hormone therapy” to minors.

“The removal of otherwise healthy or non-diseased body parts from minor children would also be prohibited,” she reportedly said in a release. “We’re talking about children that can’t get a tattoo or smoke a cigar or a cigarette in the state of Georgia, but can be castrated and get sterilized."

GOP lawmaker: Aiding minors' transgender surgery should be a felony

How far the mighty have fallen that we need laws for this insanity

Nation of morons ..yep that would be us

 

[BULLDOG]

Get back with me when that dumb ass bill passes.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Speaking of morons
Will do sfb...will do

 

[impuretrash]

Why would anyone vote against it? In a sane world that would be political suicide.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Why would anyone vote against it? In a sane world that would be political suicide.

Nothing about globo homo bizzaro progressive left wing nazi world is sane ,smart,or rational

 

[fncceo]

Actually, the argument against the bill would the the same 4th Amendment right to privacy (specifically medical privacy). The argument in favor of the bill is that it applies only to minors who, it could be argued, don't possess the capacity to make life-altering medical decisions.

Ultimately, if the bill is passed, it could set precedents affecting abortion rights, specifically as they apply to minors.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Actually, the argument against the bill would the the same 4th Amendment right to privacy (specifically medical privacy). The argument in favor of the bill is that it applies only to minors who, it could be argued, don't possess the capacity to make life-altering medical decisions.

Ultimately, if the bill is passed, it could set precedents affecting abortion rights, specifically as they apply to minors.

Fantastic point
And indeed it could

It's still batshit crazy that we need this type of law to prevent deranged women from destroying their young male children