So apparently in Louisiana, there are some yet unwilling to make a policy statement about Amendment 13, which abolished involuntary servitude--except that it was badly, (GOP), worded--and needed Amendment 14. Many are still unsure, of course, if Amendment 14 should be the more hated of the two. That one goes to civil liberties. You cannot just convict based on race, and set the coloreds back to slavery, allowed under Amendment 13. So why should anyone, maybe it is thought, apologize for what Amendment 13 was unable to do(?)!
Rep. Steve Scalise is widely now shown disinclined to apologize for previous Louisiana State Policy, regarding slavery.
Minutes highlight Scalise efforts to kill resolution apologizing for slavery
Anyone can see that the Republican, U. S. House members, know exactly who they need to convince(?)! Their leader, McCarthy, for example: Is from the Blue State of California. It is widely thought there that Amendments 13 and 14: Were actually a viable outcome. No doubt is left in doubt that the cows were not what Lincoln tried to free. . . .until this year(?).
The Republicans of 2015 seem yet unwilling to concede that they were only partially elected, even though "Occupy Washington, D. C.," is so far about them. The Senate is supposed to be imbalance, small state over large state. The House is supposed to be the other way around, on the basis that everyone in fact will vote.
What the Framers intended in the original document itself, of course, is not always openly discussed.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many White Eyes now in Washington, D., C., now squat cross-legged, ready to "Chant and Be Happy!")
Rep. Steve Scalise is widely now shown disinclined to apologize for previous Louisiana State Policy, regarding slavery.
Minutes highlight Scalise efforts to kill resolution apologizing for slavery
Anyone can see that the Republican, U. S. House members, know exactly who they need to convince(?)! Their leader, McCarthy, for example: Is from the Blue State of California. It is widely thought there that Amendments 13 and 14: Were actually a viable outcome. No doubt is left in doubt that the cows were not what Lincoln tried to free. . . .until this year(?).
The Republicans of 2015 seem yet unwilling to concede that they were only partially elected, even though "Occupy Washington, D. C.," is so far about them. The Senate is supposed to be imbalance, small state over large state. The House is supposed to be the other way around, on the basis that everyone in fact will vote.
What the Framers intended in the original document itself, of course, is not always openly discussed.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many White Eyes now in Washington, D., C., now squat cross-legged, ready to "Chant and Be Happy!")