You have just described the last thoughts of Trayvon Martin. Because our system was soft on crime his killer remains free.
Holy shit I didn't even realize it until you pointed that out.
If somebody pointed a gun at you, like George did to trevon, and he never saw his family again, should George have got a slap on the wrist?
Zimmerman was not the criminal.
Martin was breaking the law when he decided to beat Zimmerman "mma style" as witnessed by a credible eyewitness.
Zimmerman should have been questioned and released, just like the cops did, before the Race Baiting Politicians got involved and tried to railroad an innocent man to prison to pander to the racist mob.
Tell me you are joking! Yes, Trayvon was whipping GZ's ass but no one knows how that scenario developed except GZ. And he wasn't about to say anything except Martin attacked him.. You keep focusing on the final moments of the altercation when Martin was on top of Zimmerman as if THAT is the justification for murder. You haven't even considered that GZ might have done something to cause Martin to react the way he did.; like pull out the gun during their brief conversation. That gesture would have certainly caused Martin to start fighting for his life. The sole witness didn't see how the fight started. And the scream could have been that of Martin when he saw the gun since it was never proven conclusively just who was screaming.
Look, fool. If you are so confident in GZ's innocence, based on his version of events, you are just as much a menace to society as he is.. You don't respect life at all if you can be so callously presumptive and judgmental. But the most diabolical thing about you and your ilk is the notion that a killer should just be able to kill someone and walk away without having to be tried.
I focus on that part because that is the part
that was witnessed. Dumbass.
Zimmerman pulling the gun on the kid unprovoked? If that was the case Martin would have grabbed the gun, not ignored it to beat Zimmerman "MMA style".
There is nothing diabolical about not wanting to put an innocent man who was just defending himself, though the torture of a trial.
What is diabolical, is your reflexive siding with the vicious criminal.
The "part that was witnessed" has no bearing on the part that was NOT witnessed you ignorant POS. The critical part was how the confrontation started. But you are too dense to understand that. And there are many scenarios that would explain why the gun wasn't grabbed. For instance GZ could have opened his jacket and placed his hand on the handle to draw the weapon. Depending on how far the tow were standing apart Martin may have had no recourse but to charge GZ and try to knock him down before he could pull the gun completely out. If GZ stumbled and fell backwards just before Martin reached him GZ would have bumped his head on the ground since his strong hand was on the gun. GZ could have reflectively used his free hand to grab Martin in order to break his fall and inadvertently pulled TM on top of him. Martin,in a panic,screamed for help while flailing away at GZ who then shot him. That scenario would explain a lot of things. Further, a lot of trace evidence was lost in the drizzle because the evidence was not properly protected
by the first officer on the scene.
You are bending over backwards searching for excuses for the criminal who's side you are reflexively on.
The "part that was witnessed, ie Martin beating a man who was screaming for help, and not stopping even when a witness yelled at him that the cops had been called,
has a bearing on the type of thug that Martin was.
Which gives us information on how he likely responded to the provocation of being followed by a "creepy assed cracker".
Hey! That's a racist slur! Aren't racist bad people in your world? Or is that just white racists who are bad people?
Anywhooo, sure we can speculate on scenarios. Let's consider yours.
1. GZ goes to pull gun at close range. Martin, 17 year old "child" reacts like a professional street soldier and charges, because in his world, a man pulling a gun is going to kill you, not hold you till the police show.
BUT, then suddenly loses his cool and instead of securing the pistol, as his training and experience tells him to, just "flails" and screams for help.
Analysis: Low probability.
2. MT knocks GZ to ground to prevent him from pulling his gun. Odd tactic, but Zimmerman, reflectively pulls his attacker over on top of him as he is trying to pull his gun, and then Martin panics at being on top of his attacker, and instead of securing the gun, flails at the man under him and screams for help.
Analysis: Low probability.
3. Compared to Zimmerman's timeline, which is validated by eyewitness account of which Zimmerman could not have known what it would exactly be.
After the following and the watching he is returning to his truck as was he mentioned on the 911 tape.
Martin, pissed off that he had been watched and followed, confronted him.
The young man, angry that a "cracker" was following him, sucker punches him in the face and GZ drops.
Martin, the football player jumps on him and begins beating his ass.
While sitting on his torso, and beating him, as was witnesses, Martin feels GZ guns and moves to secure it.
While stating, that he was going to kill Zimmerman.
As a former young man, I can tell you young men say shit like that all the time, especially in fist fights. Do you deny that?
We can speculate whether he was actually gong to kill Zimmerman, but regardless Zimmerman believed him, and in the struggle, ended up with the gun and shot the man sitting on him beating him.
Analysis: Very believable, and supported by eyewitness account, of which Zimmerman could NOT have knows exactly what was seen, if he was lying.
AND not contradicted by the physical evidence.
Which Zimmerman could not have known exactly what it would be, nor that it was not "properly protected".
Treyvon Martin, forever 17.
