GOP Disliked For Lack Of Health Plan! Public Option Liked!

[mascale]

The GOP is mostly famous for boosting the anti-human rights agenda of Mainland China, getting Mainland China to finance the phony "anti-terror" rhetoric, with now apparent viable in the offing funding--year after year after year.

Anyone notes the comparison of GOP regard for human life and rights, and money made from human lampshade-skin. Anyone notices that Mainland China is variously accused of not respecting human rights. Anyone notices that US GOP created deficit procurement funding for allegedly viable: Basis-free anti-terrorist wars, and anti-terrorist foreclosure proceedings(?)!

Funding from Human Rights violators is not said easily opposed by anyone GOP. "What's a little human-rights infringement between creditors and borrowers," is not being asked, even now, even anywhere. The bail-out of the banks and financial houses--itself orginated at GOP.

GOP is opposed to health care, and is widely perceived to not be on board with the Democrats in reforming health care. USA prefers the public option, punto with no opt-outs.

National (US) Poll * November 19, 2009 * American Voters Like Obama, Bu - Quinnipiac University – Hamden, Connecticut

The Democrats actually tie health care reform to deficit reduction, and therefore less reliance on money printed on human lampshade skin--kinds of records on human rights.

It is noted that Bernie Madoff's clients were spared the moral dillema this creates. The collapse of Lehman Brothers may have spared others.

Hollywood, of course: Is rarely on board: In these kinds of matters. There is recourse to the Holy Father's, own Christian Hitler Youth, for example. This apparently has great appeal amongsts less enlightened Anglicans, and apparently the Kennedy family.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(The Former Colonies do seem to understand that equal rights are about little X's, of course! There is low income X a fixed percentage for the poor, and high income X a fixed percentage for the rich. How more equal can it get?)

 

[Freedomlover]

This is one of the most incoherent posts I have ever read on this board. By the way, according some polls Obamacare is supported now by only 38% of those polled.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Um, if nationalization of the US Health Care industry is so darn popular, why are Dems skulking around voting on weekends for it and why are they paying off Mary Landrieu $300MM?

 

[blu]

to start a good debate you need a coherent viewpoint. your OP on the other hand gave me a headache

 

[California Girl]

This is one of the most incoherent posts I have ever read on this board. By the way, according some polls Obamacare is supported now by only 38% of those polled.

Oh, thank God for that! I was afraid my IQ had tanked along with Obama's polls!

 

[saveliberty]

Classic case of two wrong views don't make a right. The interesting part was the orginal post was edited. Usually that is done to correct spelling or clarify. Those coming off a weekend bender should wait til Tuesday to post.

 

[ihopehefails]

I wasn't going to reply to this but how can you say that any conservative is responsible for violating human rights when most conservatives should believe in the concept of limited government where the government is restricted from passing laws that restrain our lives. The way I see it is that those who think that they are expanding human rights by creating laws don't realize that every law created restricts the freedom of someone so those that advocate for the expansion of govt power over our lives are diminishing the freedoms of individuals within society.

 

[driveby]

to start a good debate you need a coherent viewpoint.

The next time you offer one up will be the first ........

 

[mascale]

Hello Ihopehefails, CrusaderFrank, saveliberty, and Driveby posters, of moral sensibility. Also hello to the more tradtional sense of moral incoherence, of GOP, and Hollywood alike! Those would be freedomlover, blu, and california girl posters.

Old Joe Kennedy had been a Nazi-Admirer, and then finally changed. Old Joe Kennedy was not alone in the original admiration, or the need to change.

Now China holds about ten percent of "The Change You Can Believe In," as opposed to whatever the Ivy League--and their West Wing colleagues, fellow-travelers, and co-conspirators(?) believe in. Nixon liked the Mainland Chinese, too. Left-Wing intellectuals like the Mainland Chinese too. Rev. Billy Graham liked anyone who liked the Jew-Jokes. The Prophet, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, may have a similar concept, too!

Anyone notices the silence of the GOP, and the commentators, writers, artists, commedians, producers, directors, rank-and-file, and mostly the Nobel-Laureate Loving elites: Regarding the new Rich Uncle on the block.

GOP Conservatives, to make a reply, do have a concept, of "Money Is The Root Of All Evil," and "You Can't Serve God And Money, (aka Mammon), and "Guns Don't Kill People! People Kill People--You, Know, with guns and tanks, and bazookas and the mortar rounds, even after whatever is left the neighbor's, Labrador Retriever.

The Conservatives brought the new standing of China about, and clearly with intent. They were not engaged in a strategy of disengagement, but even campaigned based upon a concept: Of a Surge.

Even Michele Obama, "Couldn't Be Proud of America Until Now!"

The Ivy League is clearly supportive of the atrocities, just like the GOP! The Democrats have Two Saturday Night Specials, now before the legislatures, and appear the more likely to be in the vanguard of deficit reduction in years to come.

Many moral stances have the concept of "tainted," or "blood money." Certain posters will clearly not so state--and clearly intended.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Not that US Civil Rights Leaders are clamoring for a special tax on incomes--specifically to clear the Mainland Chinese Burden. The International Organizations do not seem too heavily enaged in the process, either! Civil Rights are like that, wherein equality means that the low income gets the same fixed percentage raise, as the successively higher incomes! It probably has something to do with the money!)

 

[Jay Canuck]

"I'm prepared to vote against any bill as long as a government-run public option is included."
-- Sen Blanche Lincoln (D-Backstabber), Link

"One out of every five people in Arkansas lacks health insurance coverage."
-- Center for American Progress, Link

"Fuck those people - do you know how much money I get from the insurance lobby?"
-- Sen Blanche Lincoln (D-Backstabber),

"SweetJeezus! Just where do these people get the idea that they can defy their own caucus on procedural votes? Why is Reid even entertaining such threats? These audacious pissants should understand that they are Democrats or they suffer the consequences. Period. "
-- SleepinJeezus, wishing our Democratic leaders had some kind of spine. Link

"I feel sorry for Reid, but there is not a single leadership vein in his nerves."
-- kash79, Link
"Does it get any worse than spineless Harry Reid? I'm considering a
move to Las Vegas just so I can vote against the sacless wonder."
-- Bartcop

 

[Mike458877]

Government dictated healthcare liked? LOL

The way I see it, the fanatical liberals are over the top as usual.

The GOP has dragged it's feet and not addressed any or very few of the problems.

What might make sense, at least to me, is taking what we do right, actually caring for people and advancement of medical science and enhancing that and find solutions to the problems, which mostly revolve around cost and payment.

Completely reinventing our system to model systems which already have or are failing is foolish.

Find reasonable solutions to the problem areas, while not taking away from our strong areas.

This basic concept works well for most successful businesses.

Mike

 

[Oddball]

Hello Ihopehefails, CrusaderFrank, saveliberty, and Driveby posters, of moral sensibility. Also hello to the more tradtional sense of moral incoherence, of GOP, and Hollywood alike! Those would be freedomlover, blu, and california girl posters.

Old Joe Kennedy had been a Nazi-Admirer, and then finally changed. Old Joe Kennedy was not alone in the original admiration, or the need to change.

Now China holds about ten percent of "The Change You Can Believe In," as opposed to whatever the Ivy League--and their West Wing colleagues, fellow-travelers, and co-conspirators(?) believe in. Nixon liked the Mainland Chinese, too. Left-Wing intellectuals like the Mainland Chinese too. Rev. Billy Graham liked anyone who liked the Jew-Jokes. The Prophet, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, may have a similar concept, too!

Anyone notices the silence of the GOP, and the commentators, writers, artists, commedians, producers, directors, rank-and-file, and mostly the Nobel-Laureate Loving elites: Regarding the new Rich Uncle on the block.

GOP Conservatives, to make a reply, do have a concept, of "Money Is The Root Of All Evil," and "You Can't Serve God And Money, (aka Mammon), and "Guns Don't Kill People! People Kill People--You, Know, with guns and tanks, and bazookas and the mortar rounds, even after whatever is left the neighbor's, Labrador Retriever.

The Conservatives brought the new standing of China about, and clearly with intent. They were not engaged in a strategy of disengagement, but even campaigned based upon a concept: Of a Surge.

Even Michele Obama, "Couldn't Be Proud of America Until Now!"

The Ivy League is clearly supportive of the atrocities, just like the GOP! The Democrats have Two Saturday Night Specials, now before the legislatures, and appear the more likely to be in the vanguard of deficit reduction in years to come.

Many moral stances have the concept of "tainted," or "blood money." Certain posters will clearly not so state--and clearly intended.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Not that US Civil Rights Leaders are clamoring for a special tax on incomes--specifically to clear the Mainland Chinese Burden. The International Organizations do not seem too heavily enaged in the process, either! Civil Rights are like that, wherein equality means that the low income gets the same fixed percentage raise, as the successively higher incomes! It probably has something to do with the money!)

I know a few farmers who can lend you their machinery to bale up all that straw.

 

[saveliberty]

Hello Ihopehefails, CrusaderFrank, saveliberty, and Driveby posters, of moral sensibility. Also hello to the more tradtional sense of moral incoherence, of GOP, and Hollywood alike! Those would be freedomlover, blu, and california girl posters.

Old Joe Kennedy had been a Nazi-Admirer, and then finally changed. Old Joe Kennedy was not alone in the original admiration, or the need to change.

Now China holds about ten percent of "The Change You Can Believe In," as opposed to whatever the Ivy League--and their West Wing colleagues, fellow-travelers, and co-conspirators(?) believe in. Nixon liked the Mainland Chinese, too. Left-Wing intellectuals like the Mainland Chinese too. Rev. Billy Graham liked anyone who liked the Jew-Jokes. The Prophet, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, may have a similar concept, too!

Anyone notices the silence of the GOP, and the commentators, writers, artists, commedians, producers, directors, rank-and-file, and mostly the Nobel-Laureate Loving elites: Regarding the new Rich Uncle on the block.

GOP Conservatives, to make a reply, do have a concept, of "Money Is The Root Of All Evil," and "You Can't Serve God And Money, (aka Mammon), and "Guns Don't Kill People! People Kill People--You, Know, with guns and tanks, and bazookas and the mortar rounds, even after whatever is left the neighbor's, Labrador Retriever.

The Conservatives brought the new standing of China about, and clearly with intent. They were not engaged in a strategy of disengagement, but even campaigned based upon a concept: Of a Surge.

Even Michele Obama, "Couldn't Be Proud of America Until Now!"

The Ivy League is clearly supportive of the atrocities, just like the GOP! The Democrats have Two Saturday Night Specials, now before the legislatures, and appear the more likely to be in the vanguard of deficit reduction in years to come.

Many moral stances have the concept of "tainted," or "blood money." Certain posters will clearly not so state--and clearly intended.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Not that US Civil Rights Leaders are clamoring for a special tax on incomes--specifically to clear the Mainland Chinese Burden. The International Organizations do not seem too heavily enaged in the process, either! Civil Rights are like that, wherein equality means that the low income gets the same fixed percentage raise, as the successively higher incomes! It probably has something to do with the money!)

I know a few farmers who can lend you their machinery to bale up all that straw.

Sorry Dude that straw is all wet too. It is worthless at this point.

 

[Oddball]

This is one of the most incoherent posts I have ever read on this board.

mascle is our resident incoherent babbler.

 

[mascale]

"Money Talks," and even tells wonders about its users, and what they believe in!

Users of U. S. money clearly believe in Human Rights violations, such as turning human hides into lampshades, and currency.

History knows about the money, and what it says about its users, and clearly what they believe in those nations which allow it.

Recently, even, in American: People who hated their friends and neighbors, went to Iraq and to Afghanistan, and in that manner helped to get them killed there, wounded there, disabled there, mutilated there--and even pretty much destroyed.

There are people like, despisers of humanity: Who follow the orders claiming peace is at hand, or victory will be the outcome. There is also, famously, "The Light Is At The End Of The Tunnel," which baby-mutilators, such General WasteMoreLand, used in Vietnam!

China was only peripherally involved in that one, in the opposition.

Now it's on our side, with USA supporitve of its human rights violations: Every instant of every day!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(More likely they probably don't like us very much, after all, at any rate!)



"Crow,

 

[Oddball]

Damn...And here I thought sillybooboo could string the non sequiturs together in one impenetrable mass of gobbledygook like nobody else!

 

[saveliberty]

I am guessing embedded CIA code?

 

[mascale]

Money still talks, and U. S. Money is increasingly the gift of Mainland China.

Takes No CIA to conclude what the Bush-Cheney-McCain-Palin-McConnell GOP all believe for all people in the United States. It takes no Homeland Security, in fact, to understand those values.

The GOP commenced accepting the Mainland Chinese money to support phony wars, intended by all U. S. Participants, including commentators, to get their buddies and friends, not only mutilated, not only butchered, not only disabled, not only destroyed--but even out-and-out really murdered too!

It takes no CIA or Homeland Security to show what cowards really are--of high-tech advanced civilization opposed to herdsman on the ground. That was shown in Iraq and in Afghanistan, and even continues until this time!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred."
(Even then Sitting Bush knew for a fact that a waste of money would be a $10.0 mil., U. S. missle crammed up the butt of an Afghan camel. So he sent in cowards instead to famously go up against the nomadic herdsmen: Grim as that clearly makes it all sound! He spend so much money elsewhere, that in fact the cowardly forces on the ground were force to forage for protective armor. The nomadic herdsmen clearly had the upper hand, against that kind of sloth, in incapability!)

 

[Oddball]

I am guessing embedded CIA code?

More like one Old Milwaukee too many.

 

[the96th]

Where is tort reform in the healthcare bill?

If the liberals can concoct a bill that insures extra tens of millions of people, while saving hundreds of billions, why can they not make the unemployment rate stop going up? The seem to be masters of financial wizardry. You have to be really, really stupid, or really "bought in", to believe any of their BS.

Obama, Pelosi, Reid et al are so out of their league that it would be laughable, were it not so serious. The community organizer goes to China, comes back home with "we have to control the deficit, or we could go back into recession". Well, gosh, did we have to go to Bejing to have the buyers of our debt give us an Econ 101 lesson?