GOP Congressman Calling for Impeachment of Trump

[Crepitus]

Read the report. There are 400+ pages of crimes committed by tRump.

How about this:

"While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."

Direct quote from the Mueller report.

Or this:

"The evidence supports the inference that the President intended (former campaign Chairman Paul) Manafort to believe that he could receive a pardon, which would make cooperation with the government as a means of obtaining a lesser sentence unnecessary."

Here's another:

"You gotta do this. You gotta call Rod ...," Trump told former White House Counsel Donald McGahn during a June 17, 2017, phone call in which he asked McGahn to remove Mueller due to conflicts of interest.



"Call Rod, tell Rod that Mueller has conflicts and can't be the Special Counsel," Trump said during a second phone call that same day. "Mueller has to go. ... Call me back when you do it."

How many more do you need?

How many more do you need?

How about one that's legitimate?

You want to say it's obstruction of justice because of something he wanted to do and didn't?

Go read the report.

tRump did do those things.

What pages is it on?

Are you fuckin' serious?

Do you need me to change your diaper too?

Ab-so-*******-lutely. So you do know, right? You have proof of your assertions?

Read the report son, it's all in there.

 

[Marion Morrison]

How about one that's legitimate?

You want to say it's obstruction of justice because of something he wanted to do and didn't?

Go read the report.

tRump did do those things.

What pages is it on?

Are you fuckin' serious?

Do you need me to change your diaper too?

Ab-so-*******-lutely. So you do know, right? You have proof of your assertions?

Read the report son, it's all in there.

On pizzactly what pages?

 

[Crepitus]

Go read the report.

tRump did do those things.

What pages is it on?

Are you fuckin' serious?

Do you need me to change your diaper too?

Ab-so-*******-lutely. So you do know, right? You have proof of your assertions?

Read the report son, it's all in there.

On pizzactly what pages?

I am not playing your silly game. Quotes we're asked for, I provided them. The report is easily accessed. Read it.

 

[Marion Morrison]

What pages is it on?

Are you fuckin' serious?

Do you need me to change your diaper too?

Ab-so-*******-lutely. So you do know, right? You have proof of your assertions?

Read the report son, it's all in there.

On pizzactly what pages?

I am not playing your silly game. Quotes we're asked for, I provided them. The report is easily accessed. Read it.

But you're incapable of providing a link, amirite?

 

[caddo kid]

what utter bull shit

you didn't read pages 227 to 368 of the report

As if you did.



Nice try, cupcake.

I bet you don't you don't even have the link for it, without it being filtered through a leftist propaganda lens. Furthermore I'll say you can't find the real link. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!

So post the official link for it, ******, or STFU and let it be known you're just a useful idiot.

The OFFICIAL LINK has been posted in my signature since the report was released

you ******* inbred ******* brain dead ******* homo *****

Oh? Post it right now, then.

As I stated the link is in my signature. It is a US Government DOJ link.

LOFL ..................... too blind to see my siggy?

Must be all that gayness in your drawers & in your mouth.

Right. You want people to read over 140 pages to have a debate with you; pages you never read before yourself.

Sorry you POS ass wipe but I have read every single ******* page of SC Mueller's report.

What have you done? Whacked off to gay porn with Marion 'John Wayne Gay. C' Morrison?

Yeah; I bet U 2 R closer than fire ants in a hill of ******* coffee beans .................

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Isn’t it strange how nearly all USMB liberals have read this 440 page report?


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

Isn't it strange how not one single tRumpkin has?

It's the honesty thing that bugs ya, huh?

It's true, if you conservatives were just a bit more truthful I would like you a lot more.

And what am I not truthful about? I can backup what I say.

Not you specifically, I'm sure you believe the junk you repeat. Conservatives generally.

I absolutely believe it which is why I post it. But I don't make shit up. If I post something, it's usually because I have read it somewhere or know very much about it. In fact for future references, I have folders of links I kept throughout the years to support the points I make. And I keep adding to them as I learn more about critical issues that I may be challenged on in the future.

 

[leftwinger]

As if you did.



Nice try, cupcake.

I bet you don't you don't even have the link for it, without it being filtered through a leftist propaganda lens. Furthermore I'll say you can't find the real link. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!

So post the official link for it, ******, or STFU and let it be known you're just a useful idiot.

The OFFICIAL LINK has been posted in my signature since the report was released

you ******* inbred ******* brain dead ******* homo *****

Oh? Post it right now, then.

As I stated the link is in my signature. It is a US Government DOJ link.

LOFL ..................... too blind to see my siggy?

Must be all that gayness in your drawers & in your mouth.

Right. You want people to read over 140 pages to have a debate with you; pages you never read before yourself.

Sorry you POS ass wipe but I have read every single ******* page of SC Mueller's report.

What have you done? Whacked off to gay porn with Marion 'John Wayne Gay C' Morrison?

Yeah; I bet U 2 R closer than fire ants in a hill of ******* coffee beans .................

I pay money each month for my trusted Experts to read it for me. Not one real Crime has been posted, linked or blasted 24-7 over the Liberal MSM.

 

[caddo kid]

The OFFICIAL LINK has been posted in my signature since the report was released

you ******* inbred ******* brain dead ******* homo *****

Oh? Post it right now, then.

As I stated the link is in my signature. It is a US Government DOJ link.

LOFL ..................... too blind to see my siggy?

Must be all that gayness in your drawers & in your mouth.

Right. You want people to read over 140 pages to have a debate with you; pages you never read before yourself.

Sorry you POS ass wipe but I have read every single ******* page of SC Mueller's report.

What have you done? Whacked off to gay porn with Marion 'John Wayne Gay C' Morrison?

Yeah; I bet U 2 R closer than fire ants in a hill of ******* coffee beans .................

I pay money each month for my trusted Experts to read it for me. Not one real Crime has been posted, linked or blasted 24-7 over the Liberal MSM.

so, I guess your message is, you are TOO ******* lazy to read for yourself.

well, congrats you lazy ***** ..................................

 

[Marion Morrison]

As if you did.



Nice try, cupcake.

I bet you don't you don't even have the link for it, without it being filtered through a leftist propaganda lens. Furthermore I'll say you can't find the real link. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!

So post the official link for it, ******, or STFU and let it be known you're just a useful idiot.

The OFFICIAL LINK has been posted in my signature since the report was released

you ******* inbred ******* brain dead ******* homo *****

Oh? Post it right now, then.

As I stated the link is in my signature. It is a US Government DOJ link.

LOFL ..................... too blind to see my siggy?

Must be all that gayness in your drawers & in your mouth.

Right. You want people to read over 140 pages to have a debate with you; pages you never read before yourself.

Sorry you POS ass wipe but I have read every single ******* page of SC Mueller's report.

What have you done? Whacked off to gay porn with Marion 'John Wayne Gay. C' Morrison?

Yeah; I bet U 2 R closer than fire ants in a hill of ******* coffee beans .................

Soo...make a proper assertion and document it properly to prove your point if you want respect. What did you conclude from reading it? Can you make an assertion and back it up, or no? This is kinda like how journalism and messageboards work. Real stuff, do I need to lay out the format for you? If so, it exposes that you're an uneducated moron, but I will if you ask, and then you you can do your thing, and I can rebut freely.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

stop with the horseshit. You claim to have read it but are unable to post quotes from it to support your position that crimes were committed by the Trump campaign. You are a disingenuous partisan hack, boy!

its people like you that are encouraging ignorance. you are so full of hate that you are blind to the actual truth that the only corruption and collusion was done by the hillary campaign and their minions in the DOJ, FBI, and obama administration.

Read the report. There are 400+ pages of crimes committed by tRump.

How about this:

"While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."

Direct quote from the Mueller report.

Or this:

"The evidence supports the inference that the President intended (former campaign Chairman Paul) Manafort to believe that he could receive a pardon, which would make cooperation with the government as a means of obtaining a lesser sentence unnecessary."

Here's another:

"You gotta do this. You gotta call Rod ...," Trump told former White House Counsel Donald McGahn during a June 17, 2017, phone call in which he asked McGahn to remove Mueller due to conflicts of interest.



"Call Rod, tell Rod that Mueller has conflicts and can't be the Special Counsel," Trump said during a second phone call that same day. "Mueller has to go. ... Call me back when you do it."

How many more do you need?

How many more do you need?

How about one that's legitimate?

You want to say it's obstruction of justice because of something he wanted to do and didn't?

Go read the report.

tRump did do those things.

First off, Manafort is a known liar, and here you are saying Trump "did" whatever Manafort said (obviously looking for leniency) makes it true?

Trump holds the Constitutional authority to fire anybody he wants for whatever he wants. Not that he did, but to say he "wanted" to fire somebody is not obstruction of justice. No more than when he fired Commy Comey.

Manafort, Cohen, Comey, McGahn, it's a vast rwnj conspiracy against their own leader!!!

Look.......this investigation has been ongoing for well over two years. Mueller found no collusion, and only stated he could not say if Trump did obstruct justice because obstruction is subjective. That's where Barr came in.

Mueller didn't investigate anything Hillary. He didn't even try. So now Barr is looking into the past which yes, could very well have been a conspiracy. It certainly seems that way.

Now the Democrats realize the lid is blown off. They are the people obstructing now, because they don't want what happened to Trump to be exposed. Since they took leadership of Congress, their entire time has been spent trying to get rid of Trump.

They don't accept Mueller's report, they don't accept that Trump won the election fair and square, and they don't accept that capitalism is a success.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

As if you did.



Nice try, cupcake.

I bet you don't you don't even have the link for it, without it being filtered through a leftist propaganda lens. Furthermore I'll say you can't find the real link. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!

So post the official link for it, ******, or STFU and let it be known you're just a useful idiot.

The OFFICIAL LINK has been posted in my signature since the report was released

you ******* inbred ******* brain dead ******* homo *****

Oh? Post it right now, then.

As I stated the link is in my signature. It is a US Government DOJ link.

LOFL ..................... too blind to see my siggy?

Must be all that gayness in your drawers & in your mouth.

Right. You want people to read over 140 pages to have a debate with you; pages you never read before yourself.

Sorry you POS ass wipe but I have read every single ******* page of SC Mueller's report.

What have you done? Whacked off to gay porn with Marion 'John Wayne Gay. C' Morrison?

Yeah; I bet U 2 R closer than fire ants in a hill of ******* coffee beans .................

Spoken like a true 14 year old. Congrats.

 

[caddo kid]

The OFFICIAL LINK has been posted in my signature since the report was released

you ******* inbred ******* brain dead ******* homo *****

Oh? Post it right now, then.

As I stated the link is in my signature. It is a US Government DOJ link.

LOFL ..................... too blind to see my siggy?

Must be all that gayness in your drawers & in your mouth.

Right. You want people to read over 140 pages to have a debate with you; pages you never read before yourself.

Sorry you POS ass wipe but I have read every single ******* page of SC Mueller's report.

What have you done? Whacked off to gay porn with Marion 'John Wayne Gay. C' Morrison?

Yeah; I bet U 2 R closer than fire ants in a hill of ******* coffee beans .................

Soo...make a proper assertion and document it properly to prove your point if you want respect. What did you conclude from reading it? Can you make an assertion and back it up, or no? This is kinda like how journalism and messageboards work. Real stuff, do I need to lay out the format for you? If so, it exposes that you're an uneducated moron, but I will if you ask, and then you you can do your thing, and I can rebut freely.

LOFL .............. if I were to offer anyone here my opinion on the subject it would make no difference.

You would just parrot my opinion as BS .....

not gonna bother with your gay ass bull shit crap ...........

 

[caddo kid]

The OFFICIAL LINK has been posted in my signature since the report was released

you ******* inbred ******* brain dead ******* homo *****

Oh? Post it right now, then.

As I stated the link is in my signature. It is a US Government DOJ link.

LOFL ..................... too blind to see my siggy?

Must be all that gayness in your drawers & in your mouth.

Right. You want people to read over 140 pages to have a debate with you; pages you never read before yourself.

Sorry you POS ass wipe but I have read every single ******* page of SC Mueller's report.

What have you done? Whacked off to gay porn with Marion 'John Wayne Gay. C' Morrison?

Yeah; I bet U 2 R closer than fire ants in a hill of ******* coffee beans .................

Spoken like a true 14 year old. Congrats.

so, you believe 14 year olds actually read Mueller's report?

LOFL ......................

 

[Marion Morrison]

Oh? Post it right now, then.

As I stated the link is in my signature. It is a US Government DOJ link.

LOFL ..................... too blind to see my siggy?

Must be all that gayness in your drawers & in your mouth.

Right. You want people to read over 140 pages to have a debate with you; pages you never read before yourself.

Sorry you POS ass wipe but I have read every single ******* page of SC Mueller's report.

What have you done? Whacked off to gay porn with Marion 'John Wayne Gay. C' Morrison?

Yeah; I bet U 2 R closer than fire ants in a hill of ******* coffee beans .................

Spoken like a true 14 year old. Congrats.

so, you believe 14 year olds actually read Mueller's report?

LOFL ......................

I don't believe you did, you haven't posted any quotes or links or anything from it. Just claimed you read it, and-? Do you have a synopsis, or are you derp?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Oh? Post it right now, then.

As I stated the link is in my signature. It is a US Government DOJ link.

LOFL ..................... too blind to see my siggy?

Must be all that gayness in your drawers & in your mouth.

Right. You want people to read over 140 pages to have a debate with you; pages you never read before yourself.

Sorry you POS ass wipe but I have read every single ******* page of SC Mueller's report.

What have you done? Whacked off to gay porn with Marion 'John Wayne Gay. C' Morrison?

Yeah; I bet U 2 R closer than fire ants in a hill of ******* coffee beans .................

Spoken like a true 14 year old. Congrats.

so, you believe 14 year olds actually read Mueller's report?

LOFL ......................

Your reply was not about the report, your reply was snowflake outrage with childish sexual innuendos. You didn't read the report. You don't read anything that isn't posted in crayon.

 

[Crepitus]

Are you fuckin' serious?

Do you need me to change your diaper too?

Ab-so-*******-lutely. So you do know, right? You have proof of your assertions?

Read the report son, it's all in there.

On pizzactly what pages?

I am not playing your silly game. Quotes we're asked for, I provided them. The report is easily accessed. Read it.

But you're incapable of providing a link, amirite?

To the Mueller report? You can't find it? It's everywhere.

 

[caddo kid]

As I stated the link is in my signature. It is a US Government DOJ link.

LOFL ..................... too blind to see my siggy?

Must be all that gayness in your drawers & in your mouth.

Right. You want people to read over 140 pages to have a debate with you; pages you never read before yourself.

Sorry you POS ass wipe but I have read every single ******* page of SC Mueller's report.

What have you done? Whacked off to gay porn with Marion 'John Wayne Gay. C' Morrison?

Yeah; I bet U 2 R closer than fire ants in a hill of ******* coffee beans .................

Spoken like a true 14 year old. Congrats.

so, you believe 14 year olds actually read Mueller's report?

LOFL ......................

I don't believe you did, you haven't posted any quotes or links or anything from it. Just claimed you read it, and-? Do you have a synopsis, or are you derp?

Well, I guess you have YET to read my signature link which will take anyone here to a DOJ web page.

But I understand U R A wild west POS that has NO brain ...............

 

[Crepitus]

Read the report. There are 400+ pages of crimes committed by tRump.

How about this:

"While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."

Direct quote from the Mueller report.

Or this:

"The evidence supports the inference that the President intended (former campaign Chairman Paul) Manafort to believe that he could receive a pardon, which would make cooperation with the government as a means of obtaining a lesser sentence unnecessary."

Here's another:

"You gotta do this. You gotta call Rod ...," Trump told former White House Counsel Donald McGahn during a June 17, 2017, phone call in which he asked McGahn to remove Mueller due to conflicts of interest.



"Call Rod, tell Rod that Mueller has conflicts and can't be the Special Counsel," Trump said during a second phone call that same day. "Mueller has to go. ... Call me back when you do it."

How many more do you need?

How many more do you need?

How about one that's legitimate?

You want to say it's obstruction of justice because of something he wanted to do and didn't?

Go read the report.

tRump did do those things.

First off, Manafort is a known liar, and here you are saying Trump "did" whatever Manafort said (obviously looking for leniency) makes it true?

Trump holds the Constitutional authority to fire anybody he wants for whatever he wants. Not that he did, but to say he "wanted" to fire somebody is not obstruction of justice. No more than when he fired Commy Comey.

Manafort, Cohen, Comey, McGahn, it's a vast rwnj conspiracy against their own leader!!!

Look.......this investigation has been ongoing for well over two years. Mueller found no collusion, and only stated he could not say if Trump did obstruct justice because obstruction is subjective. That's where Barr came in.

Mueller didn't investigate anything Hillary. He didn't even try. So now Barr is looking into the past which yes, could very well have been a conspiracy. It certainly seems that way.

Now the Democrats realize the lid is blown off. They are the people obstructing now, because they don't want what happened to Trump to be exposed. Since they took leadership of Congress, their entire time has been spent trying to get rid of Trump.

They don't accept Mueller's report, they don't accept that Trump won the election fair and square, and they don't accept that capitalism is a success.

The Mueller report also says evidence was hidden and or destroyed.

The special counsel "learned that some of the individuals we interviewed or whose conduct we investigated — including some associated with the Trump Campaign deleted relevant communications or communicated during the relevant period using applications that feature encryption or that do not provide for long term retention of data or communication records,” “In such cases the Office was not able to corroborate witness statements through comparison to contemporaneous communications or fully question witnesses about statements that appeared inconsistent with the other known facts."

And that they “faced practical limits on its ability to access relevant evidence as well — numerous witnesses and subjects lived abroad, and documents were held outside the United States,”

This is why they concluded they could not exonerate tRump and his accomplices.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

How about one that's legitimate?

You want to say it's obstruction of justice because of something he wanted to do and didn't?

Go read the report.

tRump did do those things.

First off, Manafort is a known liar, and here you are saying Trump "did" whatever Manafort said (obviously looking for leniency) makes it true?

Trump holds the Constitutional authority to fire anybody he wants for whatever he wants. Not that he did, but to say he "wanted" to fire somebody is not obstruction of justice. No more than when he fired Commy Comey.

Manafort, Cohen, Comey, McGahn, it's a vast rwnj conspiracy against their own leader!!!

Look.......this investigation has been ongoing for well over two years. Mueller found no collusion, and only stated he could not say if Trump did obstruct justice because obstruction is subjective. That's where Barr came in.

Mueller didn't investigate anything Hillary. He didn't even try. So now Barr is looking into the past which yes, could very well have been a conspiracy. It certainly seems that way.

Now the Democrats realize the lid is blown off. They are the people obstructing now, because they don't want what happened to Trump to be exposed. Since they took leadership of Congress, their entire time has been spent trying to get rid of Trump.

They don't accept Mueller's report, they don't accept that Trump won the election fair and square, and they don't accept that capitalism is a success.

The Mueller report also says evidence was hidden and or destroyed.

The special counsel "learned that some of the individuals we interviewed or whose conduct we investigated — including some associated with the Trump Campaign deleted relevant communications or communicated during the relevant period using applications that feature encryption or that do not provide for long term retention of data or communication records,” “In such cases the Office was not able to corroborate witness statements through comparison to contemporaneous communications or fully question witnesses about statements that appeared inconsistent with the other known facts."

And that they “faced practical limits on its ability to access relevant evidence as well — numerous witnesses and subjects lived abroad, and documents were held outside the United States,”

This is why they concluded they could not exonerate tRump and his accomplices.

I don't know what's with you people on the left. A special council is not called in to exonerate anybody, it's to investigate. Mueller couldn't exonerate Trump even if he wanted to. All he can do (and did) was present his findings to the Attorney General and Department of Justice. He can make recommendations, but he is not a judge in the investigation. There is a process for that.

 

[caddo kid]

Go read the report.

tRump did do those things.

First off, Manafort is a known liar, and here you are saying Trump "did" whatever Manafort said (obviously looking for leniency) makes it true?

Trump holds the Constitutional authority to fire anybody he wants for whatever he wants. Not that he did, but to say he "wanted" to fire somebody is not obstruction of justice. No more than when he fired Commy Comey.

Manafort, Cohen, Comey, McGahn, it's a vast rwnj conspiracy against their own leader!!!

Look.......this investigation has been ongoing for well over two years. Mueller found no collusion, and only stated he could not say if Trump did obstruct justice because obstruction is subjective. That's where Barr came in.

Mueller didn't investigate anything Hillary. He didn't even try. So now Barr is looking into the past which yes, could very well have been a conspiracy. It certainly seems that way.

Now the Democrats realize the lid is blown off. They are the people obstructing now, because they don't want what happened to Trump to be exposed. Since they took leadership of Congress, their entire time has been spent trying to get rid of Trump.

They don't accept Mueller's report, they don't accept that Trump won the election fair and square, and they don't accept that capitalism is a success.

The Mueller report also says evidence was hidden and or destroyed.

The special counsel "learned that some of the individuals we interviewed or whose conduct we investigated — including some associated with the Trump Campaign deleted relevant communications or communicated during the relevant period using applications that feature encryption or that do not provide for long term retention of data or communication records,” “In such cases the Office was not able to corroborate witness statements through comparison to contemporaneous communications or fully question witnesses about statements that appeared inconsistent with the other known facts."

And that they “faced practical limits on its ability to access relevant evidence as well — numerous witnesses and subjects lived abroad, and documents were held outside the United States,”

This is why they concluded they could not exonerate tRump and his accomplices.

I don't know what's with you people on the left. A special council is not called in to exonerate anybody, it's to investigate. Mueller couldn't exonerate Trump even if he wanted to. All he can do (and did) was present his findings to the Attorney General and Department of Justice. He can make recommendations, but he is not a judge in the investigation. There is a process for that.

You are correct; it is called Congress, and they have the authority & the responsibility to exercise their Constitutional check on the executive, which hopefully they will do just that.