Google admits the Biden regime ordered them to censor free speech, thanks the GOP for exposing it

[Marener]

Quit trying to change what he said! Be a better human being!

I’m the only one that’s actually looking at what he said.

 

[Frankenstein]

I’m the only one that’s actually looking at what he said.

No you are trying to change the fact that the quote I provided said he was a Trump supporter. You are being an ass and trolling! Quit making excuses for the scumbag

 

[Foxfyre]

There’s a lot to be said about antitrust and google, but none of that has to do with the first amendment.

It has everything to do with First Amendment that was never EVER intended to protect those who use speech to urge illegal actions, murder, lawlessness, commit libel, slander or violate anybody else's rights.

 

[Marener]

It has everything to do with First Amendment that was never EVER intended to protect those who use speech to urge illegal actions, murder, lawlessness, commit libel, slander or violate anybody else's rights.

You’re all over the map. First you’re talking about antitrust and now you’re veering back to libel and slander.

Can you post a coherent argument?

 

[Foxfyre]

You’re all over the map. First you’re talking about antitrust and now you’re veering back to libel and slander.

Can you post a coherent argument?

Can you read? My argument was entirely coherent and completely responsive to your remarks as well as being on topic.

 

[Marener]

Can you read? My argument was entirely coherent and completely responsive to your remarks as well as being on topic.

It’s total gibberish but I bet it sounded intelligent to you.

 

[Foxfyre]

It’s total gibberish but I bet it sounded intelligent to you.

I'm sorry you have so little understanding of the First Amendment and that you seem to think Google should be allowed to violate it in whatever ways it chooses to do that.

Do you not think suppression of any conservative opinion, election interference, manipulating what information the public is allowed to see, allowing libel and slander and defamation of people while suppressing information that would expose it, does not violate the intent of the First Amendment?

 

[d0gbreath]

By not allowing us to see any sources that they don't want us to see. By designing the algorithms to show us only what they want us to see. By making sure the first several pages of links are only what they want us to see.

If you're relying on an internet search engine to know what is going on in the world today, I don't know what to tell you. Pathetic comes to mind.

 

[drudge X]

If you're relying on an internet search engine to know what is going on in the world today, I don't know what to tell you. Pathetic comes to mind.

I'd say relying on social media to make decisions in life is far more pathetic.

 

[drudge X]

There’s a lot to be said about antitrust and google, but none of that has to do with the first amendment.

Kimmel's suspension also has nothing to do with the First Amendment but didn't stop leftist like you from lying.

 

[WEATHER53]

Just like we said despite incessant lib loon but…but.,.

 

[WEATHER53]

Some of us never got Covid, even though everyone around us did. Why would anyone immune want to take an experimental treatment?

To show others that you care
Lib 101

 

[WEATHER53]

You’re all over the map. First you’re talking about antitrust and now you’re veering back to libel and slander.

Can you post a coherent argument?

Yeah he covered the bases and that upsets your wishes

 

[d0gbreath]

I'd say relying on social media to make decisions in life is far more pathetic.

I agree. Get off the screens and take a look around you.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

I don't know where you heard that.

It was the running narrative throughout the entirety of Covid. The abilities of the vaccine kept changing as the previous narratives proved untrue.

Likely the same people that said the vaccine CAUSES COVID.

And I never heard that.

Get the facts about COVID-19 vaccines​

View attachment 1165603
Mayo Clinic
https://www.mayoclinic.org › in-depth › art-20484859
In December 2020, the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine was found to be both safe and effective in preventing infection and serious illness among people age 18 or older.

If it doesn’t prevent infection then why did they call it a vaccine? And, was this the official word on the vaccine at that time?

Yep

BS.

"Nothing they told us about the vaccine for the first two years after it came out was true. It did not prevent infection; it did not prevent spread; it did not prevent reinfection and it did not prevent death".

What was your point in quoting this?

 

[Nostra]

Something we all knew was going on, and it's finally confirmed.

Too little, too late, of course.

It would have been nice for Google to have some balls and say no to the fascist Biden regime at the time, but they didn't.







View attachment 1165366

The Murder Cult.......................always doing what they accuse others of.








...

 

[Nostra]

How the hell does a search engine violate first amendment rights? Come on people.

Wow! You really that stuck in the 80's?

 

[Nostra]

Is every flu vaccine, "experimental"?

A new vaccine comes out every year.

Since it's a guess, I would call it experimental.

Never had one, I can't recall last time I had the flu. It's been decades.

 

[Nostra]

If you're relying on an internet search engine to know what is going on in the world today, I don't know what to tell you. Pathetic comes to mind.

And you rely on that Madcow dude on MSDNC for your knowledge of what goes on in the world today.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

So you lied about what he said. He never actually said he was a Trump supporter.

Kimmel's statement is literally true. MAGAs were desperately trying to characterize him as anything other than one of them.

And Democrats were desperately trying to characterize him as anything other than one of their own. So?