You pretend to be a scientist but you purpose leave stuff, out . Yes they have used UV to kill on the surface of an object but not in a persons body. The uv level needed to do that in the body would cause damage.
Again -- links have been given for direct injection of UV thru an IV needle into a vein to knock down infections. And there IS a company (Aytu Bioscience) planning to take a UV "injection" technique to human trials for Covid. To be used on INTUBATED patients in order to knock out "2ndary" Covid invasions in the trachea.
YOU ignored ALL the science I presented that has been done to select wavelengths and minimize "exposure" times that ARE safe for both internal and external use... And you're still repeating BLANKET refutations that are not true at all...
The DANGER to the body is based on wavelengths and exposure times. Just like the billions of X-rays that are used in ROUTINE medical/dental screening and cancer treatments -- Exposures times in seconds and minutes with NARROW BAND UV light are NOT necessarily harmful at all to most tissues,
The EXCEPTION IS -- the eyes.. And that's an easier problem..
The concern is
not time but
the level of UVL that is needed to kill the virus. I have put many links to the experts who make and use these products and they make warning that it is dangerous
It is not me it is people who use UVL in a business setting.
another link
Can you kill coronavirus with UV light?
The UV that can kill coronavirus is the same that can quote
“You would literally be frying people,” says Dan Arnold, laughing in disbelief.
Arnold works for UV Light Technology, a company that provides disinfecting equipment to hospitals, pharmaceutical companies and food manufacturers across the UK.
yeah I seen this picture and it looks really professional. Still it is being used on the arm and not the lungs or face , etc. The UVL is probably pretty low.
Yeah this is alternative medicine like acupuncture and the others
,Alternative medicine describes any practice that aims to achieve the healing effects of medicine, but which lacks biological plausibility and is untested, untestable or proven ineffective
This has been around since the 1950 but never really caught on.
There is also a third type: UVC. This relatively obscure part of the spectrum consists of a shorter, more energetic wavelength of light. It is particularly good at destroying genetic material – whether in humans or viral particles. Luckily, most of us are unlikely to have ever encountered any. That’s because it’s filtered out by ozone in the atmosphere long before it reaches our fragile skin.
scientists discovered that they could harness UVC to kill microorganisms. Since the finding in 1878, artificially produced UVC has become a staple method of sterilisation
“UVC is really nasty stuff – you shouldn't be exposed to it,” says Arnold. “It can take hours to get sunburn from UVB, but with UVC it takes seconds.
There is your time lag
However, the vast majority of the UVC lamps on the market don’t use far-UVC yet – and again, it hasn’t been tested in actual humans,
just on our cells in petri dishes and other animals. So this type of radiation probably won’t help you during the current pandemic either.
Your arguments are still just looking at the bright side and ignoring the hazards. You and Trump really do thing alike.
The bottom line it is use on inanimate objects as it works as it is suppose to. One day they may get there but they are not there now.
The second issues is it used for cleaning after the fact. Once an infected person gets on that plane, bus, subway, taxi, the risk for passing it on high. Until they find a cure or antidote UV sounds interesting. Then it will go away as interesting as they found a way to treat the virus using conventional methods.