Again, I do not care. ACA is a scam. Want good insurance? Get a good job.CNBC is fake news. Anything else?What is up to the SC? You keep dodging.The OP should be concentrated on why so many have preexisting conditions. Why do you keep deflecting?You’re missing the key point. We are the fattest and unhealthiest country. Maybe less fast food, fatty and you won’t have worry about pre-existing conditions. Doesn’t all your Jew hatred burn calories?Explain whyThat's the point of having insurance before something bad happens....
After all, you don't insure your house after it burns down, do you????
Piss poor analogy.
I already did. read the posts.
I'm sure the board members don't want to talk about me, so I refer you to the OP.
I know you are trying to derail this post so I reported you. This easy, if you vote for tramp gone are the Pec's. Why don't you start a thread on what causes PEC's.
So why didn’t you answer Will’s point? If he is going to end PEC’s, why hasn’t he done so already?
He is waiting on the Supreme Court, you know he is trying to end PEC's and the ACA.
Waiting for the SC to do what?
It up at the SC and tramp wants it to be gone.Supreme Court to hear challenge to Obamacare on Nov. 10, a week after Election Day
A decision in the case, which could disrupt the health care coverage of tens of millions of Americans, is expected by June of 2021.www.cnbc.com
holy crap azog - you really didn't know it's b4 the SC? they will be hearing the case after the election. do yer own research then.
Or better yet, pay for your own healthcare. Insurance is for unexpected loss. It doesn't make healthcare cheaper, it makes it more expensive.
No one expects bad health news. You get cancer, you need a heart bypass and have no health insurance? You're screwed and most likely will be bankrupted in a very short amount of time.
So your "better yet - pay for it yourself" thing doesn't work. Bad health news is ALWAYS unexpected and is something no one can anticipate.
Sure, insurance make sense for unexpected calamities - but a sane person can budget for regular health care needs. It's irrational, and expensive, to use insurance to finance routine healthcare expenses. The more healthcare we pay for ourselves, the better off we'll be.
I used to have catastrophic healthcare until the ACA mandate and it went away. It covered catastrophic events only. Well checks, minor illnesses were left to me and I could negotiate with the doctor's office if I paid that day.
Yep. Catastrophic policies were the way out. But ACA closed that door. Because the entire point of ACA was to herd everyone into the insurance industry pens, to set them up as permanent, government sponsored middlemen in every healthcare transaction.
the ACA has catasrophic coverage only policies - but are for those on the younger side ( age 35 & lower?) because of the obvious reasons.
Yep. They're regulated in a number of ways that make them more expensive and less available. Thanks Obama!