Go Green they said

Manonthestreet

Diamond Member
Joined
May 20, 2014
Messages
40,990
Reaction score
33,020
Points
3,645
The company is saying it will be six months to a year-long delay, but, given the waiting times for transformers in the US have blown out to an astounding 120 weeks, and up to 210 weeks or 2 to 4 years, it seems wildly optimistic to hope this can be back in action next year. Currently the AEMO officially describes this fault as continuing until May 3rd, 2026. Another Battery Catastrophe | Power Line
Battery storage is the way forward.........oooops. Not ready for prime. How much govt money is pissed away chasing their green god
 
The company is saying it will be six months to a year-long delay, but, given the waiting times for transformers in the US have blown out to an astounding 120 weeks, and up to 210 weeks or 2 to 4 years, it seems wildly optimistic to hope this can be back in action next year. Currently the AEMO officially describes this fault as continuing until May 3rd, 2026. Another Battery Catastrophe | Power Line
Battery storage is the way forward.........oooops. Not ready for prime. How much govt money is pissed away chasing their green god
The technology is fantastic...just a shame it isn't fit for purpose(not reliable and cheap). When it finally is then great; but until then it's a waste of money.

Greg
 
Battery storage is the way forward.........oooops. Not ready for prime. How much govt money is pissed away chasing their green god

The only really "efficient" electric storage method I have seen is pumped storage. It's a very mature and proven system, and has been in use for over 100 years. None of the multiple gravity batteries or anything else has been anything other than a money pit.

This is just trying to avoid that the majority of the "green power" solutions are really not all that good. And if it relies upon any kind of batteries as in actual batteries, then there are much deeper problems with their plan.

But most of what I call "Green Idiots" do not want simple, low tech and cost effective solutions. They want the most expensive and convoluted systems they can dream up, does not matter if they actually work or not.
 
The only really "efficient" electric storage method I have seen is pumped storage. It's a very mature and proven system, and has been in use for over 100 years. None of the multiple gravity batteries or anything else has been anything other than a money pit.

This is just trying to avoid that the majority of the "green power" solutions are really not all that good. And if it relies upon any kind of batteries as in actual batteries, then there are much deeper problems with their plan.

But most of what I call "Green Idiots" do not want simple, low tech and cost effective solutions. They want the most expensive and convoluted systems they can dream up, does not matter if they actually work or not.

Very true ...

Folks will install solar panels for electricity to run their clothes dryer on sunny days ... instead of hanging the laundry on a line out in the sun ... carbon-intensive EVs instead of bicycles ... US Message Board instead of local coffee shop ...

The list of "green" waste goes on ...
 
Transformers are transformers no matter what the source of generation. Data centers are eating up a lot of the supply, but also cities like mine have been working to upgrade their grids to something more state of the art than WW2 era infrastructure, and that adds to the backlog.
 
Pumped storage uses more electricity than it creates a lot more.

That is not the point. It uses power in the off-peak hours, so it can release it and get power during the peak hours.

And that is how electricity works. It has to be used when generated, or wasted. So why not use the excess power that would usually be wasted to operate water as a battery?

Plus it uses a fungible medium that is also valuable for other reasons.
 
And the grid, once again, is rescued by an old coal plant that keeps running


nuff said.......~S~
 
That is not the point. It uses power in the off-peak hours, so it can release it and get power during the peak hours.

And that is how electricity works. It has to be used when generated, or wasted. So why not use the excess power that would usually be wasted to operate water as a battery?

Plus it uses a fungible medium that is also valuable for other reasons.

Because we aren't "wasting" that energy ... we aren't creating it ... if the electricity isn't needed, then we stop burning coal or natural gas ... or stop releasing water out the dam ...

Pumped storage is very inefficient ... and can be dangerous (20 minute video from our good friend Grady) ...
 
Stop putting the cart infront of the horse. Get the technology designed, built, and running. And once it's all working, then close the coal power plant. Morons run every country.
 
Stop putting the cart infront of the horse. Get the technology designed, built, and running. And once it's all working, then close the coal power plant. Morons run every country.

We're not replacing fossil fuels with these new energy technologies ... we're just using more energy ... these coal power plants will stay on-line until the coal runs out ...
 
1763999293742.webp
 

99% of "Green Energy" claims are really just greenwashing. Like ignoring the huge amounts of CO2 emitted from front to back in creating things like solar panels and modern batteries. Yeah, only "green" if you ignore all that was done to create the panel in the first place.

Especially since most of them are made in the nation with the least amount of environmental regulations on the planet, and seems to have no problem turning their own nation into a wasteland in order to make money.

You can really tell how little most people who believe nonsense like that really understand science. I can't even count the number of times I have heard such people praise concrete buildings, and promote using concrete over wood because it's "green".

Yeah, just ignore the massive amounts of CO2 released when the concrete was made in the first place. For those that do not know, that is when limestone (CaCO3) is heated to high temperatures in a kiln (which requires some kind of energy) in order to calcinate it. Which ends in the creation of Calcium Oxide (CaO), and releases CO2 as a waste product. Now as the concrete cures it will absorb some of that CO2 back, but nowhere near as much as was released in the transformation from limestone to concrete, and the energy used to change it in the first place.

For some reason, the "Green Energy" fanatics always ignore everything involved in making the things that make their green energy. Or the damage that such might do to the environment in the end. And it has really always fascinated me how most "Green Energy" types absolutely despise hydropower.
 
The company is saying it will be six months to a year-long delay, but, given the waiting times for transformers in the US have blown out to an astounding 120 weeks, and up to 210 weeks or 2 to 4 years, it seems wildly optimistic to hope this can be back in action next year. Currently the AEMO officially describes this fault as continuing until May 3rd, 2026. Another Battery Catastrophe | Power Line
Battery storage is the way forward.........oooops. Not ready for prime. How much govt money is pissed away chasing their green god

Thank god I put in solar panals and windmill huh?

Now I see that Republicans are just like Democrats. Democrats don't mind paying more taxes so that we have social safety nets and social programs like social security and medicare. We will pay a little more so that everyone in insured.

Republicans will pay more in tariffs if that will help business' profit more. After Republicans gave those companies tax breaks. And Republicans don't mind endless wars if that will help the military industrial complex. And they certainly don't mind the president profiting from it. Unless it's a Democrat. Remember Republicans accused the Biden crime family of stealing $20 million over 20 years in 20 LLC's? Trump has stole $500 billion in 500 llc's in just 1 year alone.
 
Back
Top Bottom