Bob0.........you might want to take a break from this forum and take a gander over to People.com for a spell. Youre getting publically pwned s0n........and not only on this thread!! Throw in the ever present level of anger always ready to erupt like a ******* volcano = creepy levels of gay.
Bottom line is.........the bomb throwers have had zero impact on public policy in this counrty. ( well, I guess there was that light bulb legislation last year)
http://www.usmessageboard.com/envir...t-how-much-ncdc-data-in-op-4.html#post5444871
For the record, I hate wingpunk closet queers who talk shit about "gay," but which don't usually come out of their tea-room, to parade in the streets, like you guys should have been doing, but instead, you write shit at USMB, like it's a public toilet. Eat shit, punks.
YOU are queers, you know it, your pal Q-bag outed himself and ran off, so eat magenta shit and die, bitches. Talk shit about "gay," you miserable bimbos. Your Log Cabin Club rant-club could be gay, since you know "queer," inside and out, so go for it, bitches.
Bob0.........you might want to take a break from this forum and take a gander over to People.com for a spell. Youre getting publically pwned s0n........and not only on this thread!! Throw in the ever present level of anger always ready to erupt like a ******* volcano = creepy levels of gay.
Bottom line is.........the bomb throwers have had zero impact on public policy in this counrty. ( well, I guess there was that light bulb legislation last year
(unquote) . . . said the speed-freak who posts a lot of misspellings in his pansy-rants, at an environment-thread.
tidal gauges ha shown a 2mm/yr rise over the history of measurement. satellites have shown a 3mm/yr rise since they came on line in the '90s. if you believe that the rate jumped 50% exactly at the same time as we started using satellites then you are credulous. there has been a documented history of 'pushing' the results in the 'right' direction every time a new satellite comes on line and needs to be calibrated. and when the sea levels were actually dropping two years ago, they added an adjustment for earth crust rebound that leads to ridiculous results if you run it backwards into the past instead of just 'starting' it when it was necessary to prop up the declining numbers.
I found some. Here is what 140 years of dangerous sea level rise looks like in La jolla, California. As you can see, the rising sea level made the area far to dangerous to be navigated by horse and buggy so they banned such vehicular traffic, built a pavillion to keep the horses a safe distance from the rising seas, and made a public beach out of the area and it is also apparently to dangerous for black and white photography also as evidenced by the photographers choice of a more colorful medium.
tidal gauges ha shown a 2mm/yr rise over the history of measurement. satellites have shown a 3mm/yr rise since they came on line in the '90s. if you believe that the rate jumped 50% exactly at the same time as we started using satellites then you are credulous. there has been a documented history of 'pushing' the results in the 'right' direction every time a new satellite comes on line and needs to be calibrated. and when the sea levels were actually dropping two years ago, they added an adjustment for earth crust rebound that leads to ridiculous results if you run it backwards into the past instead of just 'starting' it when it was necessary to prop up the declining numbers.
I'm still waiting to see that phographic evidence of the great coastal cities of the planet submerging under the rising oceans.
I have looked and can't find any. Can anybody produce the photographic evidence of the rising oceans?
tidal gauges ha shown a 2mm/yr rise over the history of measurement. satellites have shown a 3mm/yr rise since they came on line in the '90s. if you believe that the rate jumped 50% exactly at the same time as we started using satellites then you are credulous. there has been a documented history of 'pushing' the results in the 'right' direction every time a new satellite comes on line and needs to be calibrated. and when the sea levels were actually dropping two years ago, they added an adjustment for earth crust rebound that leads to ridiculous results if you run it backwards into the past instead of just 'starting' it when it was necessary to prop up the declining numbers.
I'm still waiting to see that phographic evidence of the great coastal cities of the planet submerging under the rising oceans.
I have looked and can't find any. Can anybody produce the photographic evidence of the rising oceans?
did you read about Virginia making it a law that only actual data can be used to project sea level rise, climate models and their unrealistic predictions are unacceptable.
its about time that more adults in the room start speaking up against doomsday fantasies.
Being a Log Cabin Club smartass isn't the same as smart, Turdsterqueer.
My original claim was perfectly good, for the last half-million years. CO2 peaks at 280 ppm, until humans came along and boosted it, so now it can race to well over 400 ppm, in our lifetime, while warming and acidification accelerate, to catch up. Since you are a queer, from a Log Cabin Closet, you want to mince words and run off.
You think you are a funny guy, with shit about extra trees, but you are a Log Cabin punk.
You are too stupid for economics or any other subject, punkass.
Being a Log Cabin Club smartass isn't the same as smart, Turdsterqueer.
My original claim was perfectly good, for the last half-million years. CO2 peaks at 280 ppm, until humans came along and boosted it, so now it can race to well over 400 ppm, in our lifetime, while warming and acidification accelerate, to catch up. Since you are a queer, from a Log Cabin Closet, you want to mince words and run off.
You think you are a funny guy, with shit about extra trees, but you are a Log Cabin punk.
You are too stupid for economics or any other subject, punkass.
My original claim was perfectly good, for the last half-million years.
Hey, shit for brains, the planet has been here a lot longer than that.
Keep trying, you may get that IQ into the double digits.
Kindly note the trends, of the last half-million years, with the planet stabilized, to max out temperatures, forced by a top equilibrium of CO2 of 280 ppm, whereupon CO2 usually heads down, gradually, and temperatures zig and zag, all the way down, to some similar global minimum, whereupon CO2 turns around, and it shoots up, to 280 ppm, again.
Only at the FAR RIGHT of this graph, from skeptic site wattsupwiththat.org, notice how the RED LINE representing CO2 concentrations jumps way UP, concurrent with the geologic blip, when humans defoliated and emitted lots of GHGs. I know it's tough to read, but it does have a RED LINE on it, so just think of it making some kind of red statement, on the right, and read the ******.
Of course, CO2 levels have been higher than 280 ppm, even as high as 1000 ppm, but not without a lot of other forcing factors, at play. Humans are the guys, who have been BOTH cutting trees and clearing bushes, while burning fossil fuels and wood. Humans are the guys, who are pushing cumulative GHG levels up, 10x faster, than during the PETM extinction. So cumulative human impact made that red line go up, toward 400 ppm, where it will continue to rise, and temperature will start chasing it, which is happening, now.
THEN the seas acidify, they get hot and anoxic, food chains and human habitats **** all up, and people die, if we keep the STUPID economy, wherein CRIME PAYS. If we get a smart economy, we can minimize loss of habitat and human life. But that depends on whether smart humans issue. If not, CO2 will rocket up to 1000 ppm and higher, faster than during the PETM extinction, so we are sure to either re-green, or suffer Mass Extinction Event 6.
Are you thinking of making some kind of jump, from tard, to smart, suddenly? Don't **** up at understanding either global warming or AGW, screw up at predicting the consequences, and then bullshit your way into thinking you are somehow bright enough, to understand economics, with your head up your own butt and wiggling.
If you can't understand AGW or baseball, look, dude! Don't bullshit people, about economics.
