Global warming is accelerating, but how much? NCDC data in OP:

Throw in the ever present level of anger always ready to erupt like a fucking volcano = creepy levels of gay.

Very creepy levels of gay. I can't say that I have ever seen anyone with that much suppressed homosexuality oozing out. It is in every post on every topic. It is strange, he claims to hate gays but on every other post, he apparently feels compelled to mention your johnson and he talks about it in very juvenile terms. It might be because he is very young, but my bet is that he especially likes young boys.
 
Throw in the ever present level of anger always ready to erupt like a fucking volcano = creepy levels of gay.

Very creepy levels of gay. I can't say that I have ever seen anyone with that much suppressed homosexuality oozing out. It is in every post on every topic. It is strange, he claims to hate gays but on every other post, he apparently feels compelled to mention your johnson and he talks about it in very juvenile terms. It might be because he is very young, but my bet is that he especially likes young boys.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/envir...t-how-much-ncdc-data-in-op-4.html#post5444871

For the record, I hate wingpunk closet queers who talk shit about "gay," but which don't usually come out of their tea-room, to parade in the streets, like you guys should have been doing, but instead, you write shit at USMB, like it's a public toilet. Eat shit, punks.

YOU are queers, you know it, your pal Q-bag outed himself and ran off, so eat magenta shit and die, bitches. Talk shit about "gay," you miserable bimbos. Your Log Cabin Club rant-club could be gay, since you know "queer," inside and out, so go for it, bitches.

Bob0.........you might want to take a break from this forum and take a gander over to People.com for a spell. Youre getting publically pwned s0n........and not only on this thread!! Throw in the ever present level of anger always ready to erupt like a fucking volcano = creepy levels of gay.

Bottom line is.........the bomb throwers have had zero impact on public policy in this counrty. ( well, I guess there was that light bulb legislation last year :eusa_dance::eusa_dance::fu: )

(unquote) . . . said the speed-freak who posts a lot of misspellings in his pansy-rants, at an environment-thread.
 
Throw in the ever present level of anger always ready to erupt like a fucking volcano = creepy levels of gay.

Very creepy levels of gay. I can't say that I have ever seen anyone with that much suppressed homosexuality oozing out. It is in every post on every topic. It is strange, he claims to hate gays but on every other post, he apparently feels compelled to mention your johnson and he talks about it in very juvenile terms. It might be because he is very young, but my bet is that he especially likes young boys.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/envir...t-how-much-ncdc-data-in-op-4.html#post5444871

For the record, I hate wingpunk closet queers who talk shit about "gay," but which don't usually come out of their tea-room, to parade in the streets, like you guys should have been doing, but instead, you write shit at USMB, like it's a public toilet. Eat shit, punks.

YOU are queers, you know it, your pal Q-bag outed himself and ran off, so eat magenta shit and die, bitches. Talk shit about "gay," you miserable bimbos. Your Log Cabin Club rant-club could be gay, since you know "queer," inside and out, so go for it, bitches.

Bob0.........you might want to take a break from this forum and take a gander over to People.com for a spell. Youre getting publically pwned s0n........and not only on this thread!! Throw in the ever present level of anger always ready to erupt like a fucking volcano = creepy levels of gay.

Bottom line is.........the bomb throwers have had zero impact on public policy in this counrty. ( well, I guess there was that light bulb legislation last year :eusa_dance::eusa_dance::fu: )

(unquote) . . . said the speed-freak who posts a lot of misspellings in his pansy-rants, at an environment-thread.


but still WINNING s0n.............:D:D:D
 
sea-level-rise.gif


tidal gauges ha shown a 2mm/yr rise over the history of measurement. satellites have shown a 3mm/yr rise since they came on line in the '90s. if you believe that the rate jumped 50% exactly at the same time as we started using satellites then you are credulous. there has been a documented history of 'pushing' the results in the 'right' direction every time a new satellite comes on line and needs to be calibrated. and when the sea levels were actually dropping two years ago, they added an adjustment for earth crust rebound that leads to ridiculous results if you run it backwards into the past instead of just 'starting' it when it was necessary to prop up the declining numbers.




I'm still waiting to see that phographic evidence of the great coastal cities of the planet submerging under the rising oceans.

I have looked and can't find any. Can anybody produce the photographic evidence of the rising oceans?
 
I'm still waiting to see that phographic evidence of the great coastal cities of the planet submerging under the rising oceans.

I have looked and can't find any. Can anybody produce the photographic evidence of the rising oceans?

I found some. Here is what 140 years of dangerous sea level rise looks like in La jolla, California. As you can see, the rising sea level made the area far to dangerous to be navigated by horse and buggy so they banned such vehicular traffic, built a pavillion to keep the horses a safe distance from the rising seas, and made a public beach out of the area and it is also apparently to dangerous for black and white photography also as evidenced by the photographers choice of a more colorful medium.


6a010536b58035970c01676482977e970b-800wi
 
I'm still waiting to see that phographic evidence of the great coastal cities of the planet submerging under the rising oceans.

I have looked and can't find any. Can anybody produce the photographic evidence of the rising oceans?

I found some. Here is what 140 years of dangerous sea level rise looks like in La jolla, California. As you can see, the rising sea level made the area far to dangerous to be navigated by horse and buggy so they banned such vehicular traffic, built a pavillion to keep the horses a safe distance from the rising seas, and made a public beach out of the area and it is also apparently to dangerous for black and white photography also as evidenced by the photographers choice of a more colorful medium.

6a010536b58035970c01676482977e970b-800wi

The La Jolla photos are without tidal reference points. This is the same character of media, as your on-end graph, without Holocene data or labels, for plots, Wiener-fucking queer BITCH. This La Jolla photo has been loaded, already. It's crap.

Unless you mark tides, contrived, unreferenced, time-lapse photo-montages are crap, to be redundantly loaded by queer-porn freaks. Load smilies like suckassbil, or fuck off. Here is various plot media, for sea-level rise:


:: Sea-level Rise :: CSIRO & ACECRC ::

What Happens When The Sea Level Rises? | The Blogannath Rolls On . . .

http://geongrid.geo.arizona.edu/arcims/website/slrworld/

http://geongrid.geo.arizona.edu/arcims/website/slrus48prvi/

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgCYhU5ISwI]Sea Level Rise Animation in Google Earth - YouTube[/ame]
 
Last edited:
sea-level-rise.gif


tidal gauges ha shown a 2mm/yr rise over the history of measurement. satellites have shown a 3mm/yr rise since they came on line in the '90s. if you believe that the rate jumped 50% exactly at the same time as we started using satellites then you are credulous. there has been a documented history of 'pushing' the results in the 'right' direction every time a new satellite comes on line and needs to be calibrated. and when the sea levels were actually dropping two years ago, they added an adjustment for earth crust rebound that leads to ridiculous results if you run it backwards into the past instead of just 'starting' it when it was necessary to prop up the declining numbers.




I'm still waiting to see that phographic evidence of the great coastal cities of the planet submerging under the rising oceans.

I have looked and can't find any. Can anybody produce the photographic evidence of the rising oceans?

did you read about Virginia making it a law that only actual data can be used to project sea level rise, climate models and their unrealistic predictions are unacceptable.

its about time that more adults in the room start speaking up against doomsday fantasies.
 
sea-level-rise.gif


tidal gauges ha shown a 2mm/yr rise over the history of measurement. satellites have shown a 3mm/yr rise since they came on line in the '90s. if you believe that the rate jumped 50% exactly at the same time as we started using satellites then you are credulous. there has been a documented history of 'pushing' the results in the 'right' direction every time a new satellite comes on line and needs to be calibrated. and when the sea levels were actually dropping two years ago, they added an adjustment for earth crust rebound that leads to ridiculous results if you run it backwards into the past instead of just 'starting' it when it was necessary to prop up the declining numbers.




I'm still waiting to see that phographic evidence of the great coastal cities of the planet submerging under the rising oceans.

I have looked and can't find any. Can anybody produce the photographic evidence of the rising oceans?

did you read about Virginia making it a law that only actual data can be used to project sea level rise, climate models and their unrealistic predictions are unacceptable.

its about time that more adults in the room start speaking up against doomsday fantasies.




All the predictions of dire consequence start with a statement that there is a slim chance that something might happen but, if it does, then these other things WILL happen.

It took me a while to notice the formula on this method of deception, but it's almost always there. If it's not there, the predictions of dire consequence are preceded but the "if".

Nothing really wrong with this. I enjoy science fiction.
 
DDs who cannot play baseball or think, in an able way, watch Matt Cain and learn.

You can't have photographic evidence, of sea level changes, unless you did time-lapse shots, with tide fluctuations clearly marked, over time. I don't know who did that. Retards keep trying to pitch an unreferenced La Jolla montage, as anti-sea level rise evidence, without any sort of tidal calibration. This is not smart enough, for baseball.

You can't call sea-level rise by its proper name, in Virginia because the wingnuts over there are DDDeniers, who backed up and fucked off, when Democrats changed terms, without admitting any unscientific data was used. That controversy was just more pubs refusing to play ball, when the gas is high, hard, and unhittable. Up go the sea levels, Hampton Roads is always getting sloshed, and then down goes NOLA and Virginia.

But if you try to call what is happening to Virginia "rising sea levels," in the Virginia state legislature, the pubs will get out their shit, which is like the shit you wingnuts eat, on your way, to someplace else, than ballpark figures, for what is really happening.

CO2 is still a problem, for the AGW-challenged, who likely can't play or watch baseball or read about science or global warming. If you are able, try to play ball. If you are at all smart, try to see how the Earth is going to eat high, hard gas. Eat riseballs, girls.

AGW is going to change the sea-level. The change-up is going to come, after the GAS.

Matt Cain and the SF Giants did a perfect 10-0 game, CO2 and other GHGs are issuing about 10x faster, than before the PETM extinction, and GHG concentrations are ACCELERATING, without the complete adjustment being evident. So UP goes the big G, up go sea levels, and while that happens, up goes acidification, and anoxic events will kill, what the acid misses.

It's bye-bye baby, time. This is the BIG ONE, Mass Extinction Event 6. Humans will be perfectly endangered, since die-offs are already underway:


matt-cain-perfect-game.jpg


The Official Site of The San Francisco Giants | SFGiants.com: Homepage

Matt Cain's Perfect Game Is First in San Francisco Giants History | Bleacher Report

------------------

OK, now for the sea level:

Sea level rise locked in at 25 metres - Blogspot

7/8/2009- Sea level rise locked in at 25 metres
Even if we are able to stabilize carbon dioxide levels at current concentrations (387 ppm), we have probably locked in ultimate sea level rise of 25 metres +/- 5 metres.

Sea Level Rise Google Mapplet

---------------- what's so hard to understand, about 10-0? Here's session 10, with graphics:

:: Sea-level Rise :: CSIRO & ACECRC ::

-----------------

DGESL : Research : Climate Change and Sea Level : Mapping Sea Level Rise

-----------------

What Happens When The Sea Level Rises? | The Blogannath Rolls On . . .

-----------------

Greenland_ice_sheet_melt_figure.gif


When Greenland ice or Antarctic shelf ice melts, UP goes the sea level!

-----------------

400000yearslarge1.gif


Look at the red line, representing CO2 concentration, at the FAR RIGHT, of the 400,000 year plot. Is that a problem, for red-staters, for some reason? That was done by HUMANS. The rate of emissions increase is 10 TIMES what it was, for the PETM extinction. Yeah, that is GHGiants, coming to town, big and fast, kindly smarten up, about the baseball, finally!

It's BYE, BYE BABY, if we don't re-green; sorry if you don't like the Oakland As or competent scientific reports and studies.
 
Last edited:
400000yearslarge1.gif


Give me a T! Give me an A! Give me an R! Give me a D! Wazzat spell?

Your first name!

Of course, CO2 levels have been higher than 280 ppm, even as high as 1000 ppm

Excellent! So your original claim was wrong, the opposite of right!

Humans are the guys, who have been BOTH cutting trees and clearing bushes,

And look at all the extra trees in the eastern United States in the last 100 years.

Being a Log Cabin Club smartass isn't the same as smart, Turdsterqueer.

My original claim was perfectly good, for the last half-million years. CO2 peaks at 280 ppm, until humans came along and boosted it, so now it can race to well over 400 ppm, in our lifetime, while warming and acidification accelerate, to catch up. Since you are a queer, from a Log Cabin Closet, you want to mince words and run off.

You think you are a funny guy, with shit about extra trees, but you are a Log Cabin punk.

You are too stupid for economics or any other subject, punkass.
 
400000yearslarge1.gif


Give me a T! Give me an A! Give me an R! Give me a D! Wazzat spell?

Your first name!

Of course, CO2 levels have been higher than 280 ppm, even as high as 1000 ppm

Excellent! So your original claim was wrong, the opposite of right!

Humans are the guys, who have been BOTH cutting trees and clearing bushes,

And look at all the extra trees in the eastern United States in the last 100 years.

Being a Log Cabin Club smartass isn't the same as smart, Turdsterqueer.

My original claim was perfectly good, for the last half-million years. CO2 peaks at 280 ppm, until humans came along and boosted it, so now it can race to well over 400 ppm, in our lifetime, while warming and acidification accelerate, to catch up. Since you are a queer, from a Log Cabin Closet, you want to mince words and run off.

You think you are a funny guy, with shit about extra trees, but you are a Log Cabin punk.

You are too stupid for economics or any other subject, punkass.

My original claim was perfectly good, for the last half-million years.

Hey, shit for brains, the planet has been here a lot longer than that.

Keep trying, you may get that IQ into the double digits.
 
We are talking about sea level rise bob. It is observable. Why is it that you guys only have computer simulations when we are talking about something that gets measured every day. Grab yourself some Civil war era photos and coastal maps and then compare them to today. Little if any change. So much for your dire predictions.
 
Last Time Carbon Dioxide Levels Were This High: 15 Million Years Ago, Scientists Report

ScienceDaily (Oct. 8, 2009) — You would have to go back at least 15 million years to find carbon dioxide levels on Earth as high as they are today, a UCLA scientist and colleagues report Oct. 8 in the online edition of the journal Science.

"The last time carbon dioxide levels were apparently as high as they are today — and were sustained at those levels — global temperatures were 5 to 10 degrees Fahrenheit higher than they are today, the sea level was approximately 75 to 120 feet higher than today, there was no permanent sea ice cap in the Arctic and very little ice on Antarctica and Greenland," said the paper's lead author, Aradhna Tripati, a UCLA assistant professor in the department of Earth and space sciences and the department of atmospheric and oceanic sciences.

The last time CO2 went up this high, humans didn't cause a radical jump. Temperatures will follow, in a way, which will show us what this planet can do, with acceleration. Temperatures will go up, like a car full of drunk idiots, with one of them applying a foot, to the accelerator, in a geologic instant sort of way.

But I know idiots can stay drunk, for what seems like a long time.
 
400000yearslarge1.gif


Being a Log Cabin Club smartass isn't the same as smart, Turdsterqueer.

My original claim was perfectly good, for the last half-million years. CO2 peaks at 280 ppm, until humans came along and boosted it, so now it can race to well over 400 ppm, in our lifetime, while warming and acidification accelerate, to catch up. Since you are a queer, from a Log Cabin Closet, you want to mince words and run off.

You think you are a funny guy, with shit about extra trees, but you are a Log Cabin punk.

You are too stupid for economics or any other subject, punkass.

My original claim was perfectly good, for the last half-million years.

Hey, shit for brains, the planet has been here a lot longer than that.

Keep trying, you may get that IQ into the double digits.

So Turdster, get a graph, showing all the trends, for five minutes or more. That might be worth something. But you are this Log Cabin Club bitch, who doesn't have anything for the planet, in any five minutes, let alone 4.5 billion years. If you are too stupid for AGW, you are too stupid for econ, and you also happen to be some kind of queer. Why don't you step out and be a bitchin,' gay rockstar?

You are too stupid for AGW, you are too stupid for economics, and you constantly act up, like a queer tweaker. You are too punkass queer to post links and references. You just got through trying to post a queer-porn pub report, over at environment, so what are you doing, trying your shit, at economics, bitch?
 
Last edited:
We are talking about sea level rise bob. It is observable. Why is it that you guys only have computer simulations when we are talking about something that gets measured every day. Grab yourself some Civil war era photos and coastal maps and then compare them to today. Little if any change. So much for your dire predictions.

As usual, the idiot speaks idiocy.

http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/education/pd/climate/factsheets/issea.pdf

More model output when it is well kinown and documented that climate models are of less use than wild guesses? Laughing at you rocks. Laughing real hard.
 
We are talking about sea level rise bob. It is observable. Why is it that you guys only have computer simulations when we are talking about something that gets measured every day. Grab yourself some Civil war era photos and coastal maps and then compare them to today. Little if any change. So much for your dire predictions.

As usual, the idiot speaks idiocy.

http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/education/pd/climate/factsheets/issea.pdf

More model output when it is well kinown and documented that climate models are of less use than wild guesses? Laughing at you rocks. Laughing real hard.

Wienerbitch, the only physics you understand is the principle of spanking it. You know, the heat of the Wienermeat times the mass of the big, hermaphrodite ass is inversely proportional to the angle of the wiener-dangle, times a constant, given constant Wienerbitch masturbation, during hockey, without a hockey stick.

It seems graphs and the study from O.R.'s link used satellite data, since the 1990s. It seems Wienerbitch can't get past tinfoil-hat reflection theory, La Jolla beach boy oceanography, gay graphics, fucktard physics, and idiot inference. Belay the queer porn, bitch.

Let go of your junk and read some studies, like the one O.R. linked:


Satellite observations available since the early 1990s provide more accurate sea level data with nearly global coverage. This decade-long satellite altimetry data set shows that since 1993, sea level has been rising at a rate of around 3 mm yr–1, significantly higher than the average during the previous half century. Coastal tide gauge measurements confirm this observation, and indicate that similar rates have occurred in some earlier decades.
 
Last edited:
The economy is all about stupid bitches, who don't know what to do, with a scam-affected mess, which developed, over years of unenforcement or uneven enforcement, of any law, but also enactment of special-interest-socialist measures, like Prohibition, the Harrison Act, the Hemp Stamp Tax Act of 1938, and the establishment of the DEA and DHS, by DDDs, who wouldn't share intel, from the CIA and FBI, or enforce borders, without a lot of funding.

The drug war was initiated, to prevent brewed alcohol, during the time petroleum became established, and the pot laws were designed to prevent Henry Ford from making too much hemp-plastic and ethanol. Now that gangs are in every town, jail, and prison, and cartels rule all territory, over gang turf, changes need to happen, to the scam, which led to 25% of the world's prisoners being funded, by 5% of the population. We don't get to endure this cost-structure, forever.

We don't get to keep starting conflict, by supporting Israel and Saddam and UBL, allowing lies to escalate to war, while paying to subsidize tyrants or those affected. The distorted economy in the US no longer allows ease of manufacture, and farmlands are threatened, by aquifer depletion and global warming. Hey! Tyranny has a cost structure, unfavorable to manufacturing, or don't you guys all know how to make stuff, under budget?

If people are too stupid to understand both global warming AND how humans defoliated and emitted GHGs, to cause CO2 to reach 400 ppm and climbing, when it always tops out at 280 ppm and heads down, to force gradual cooling, people are too stupid, to understand economics and the fatal distortion our economy has undergone. Stupid is, as stupid does. Don't try to make nukes, if you pronounce it, "nukuler." Fuckups do this.

We are suffering accelerating GHG emissions, currently 10x PETM rates. We will suffer Mass Extinction Event 6, as sure as Cain pitched to 27, during 10-0 vs. Astros, the other day, and the Giants won it all, in 2010, the hottest year, on instrument record.

Beware the GAS, in your face; see rise-balls, gamer-babes. When the Giants come to town, it's BYE-BYE, BABY! Same with GHGs. The change-up follows the gas, dammit, you fuckups, who can't play football, either. Or, re-green and dig the As. After AGW, the heat and acid will follow, with anoxic events and more heat, after that!

If you are too stupid for AGW, you are too stupid, for economics. But if you can't pitch, hit, or field, at least watch trends, or even baseball, on TV. Or there's no hope, for you. Ever. Not anywhere. Distortion is how stupid people got to a sizable percentage of today's 7 billion souls. Distortion allows people who are too wussy for football to forget about baseball, and then they are too stupid to notice AGW, and NO WAY do any DDs who struck out at three of the above master economics, let alone manufacturing.

So, smarten the fuck up, and don't fuck up. That is to say, quit fucking up.

If people are too stupid to understand both global warming AND how humans defoliated and emitted GHGs, to cause CO2 to reach 400 ppm and climbing, when it always tops out at 280 ppm and heads down

In the history of the Earth, CO2 never topped 280 ppm?
Are you sure?

400000yearslarge1.gif


Kindly note the trends, of the last half-million years, with the planet stabilized, to max out temperatures, forced by a top equilibrium of CO2 of 280 ppm, whereupon CO2 usually heads down, gradually, and temperatures zig and zag, all the way down, to some similar global minimum, whereupon CO2 turns around, and it shoots up, to 280 ppm, again.

Only at the FAR RIGHT of this graph, from skeptic site wattsupwiththat.org, notice how the RED LINE representing CO2 concentrations jumps way UP, concurrent with the geologic blip, when humans defoliated and emitted lots of GHGs. I know it's tough to read, but it does have a RED LINE on it, so just think of it making some kind of red statement, on the right, and read the fucker.

Of course, CO2 levels have been higher than 280 ppm, even as high as 1000 ppm, but not without a lot of other forcing factors, at play. Humans are the guys, who have been BOTH cutting trees and clearing bushes, while burning fossil fuels and wood. Humans are the guys, who are pushing cumulative GHG levels up, 10x faster, than during the PETM extinction. So cumulative human impact made that red line go up, toward 400 ppm, where it will continue to rise, and temperature will start chasing it, which is happening, now.

THEN the seas acidify, they get hot and anoxic, food chains and human habitats fuck all up, and people die, if we keep the STUPID economy, wherein CRIME PAYS. If we get a smart economy, we can minimize loss of habitat and human life. But that depends on whether smart humans issue. If not, CO2 will rocket up to 1000 ppm and higher, faster than during the PETM extinction, so we are sure to either re-green, or suffer Mass Extinction Event 6.

Are you thinking of making some kind of jump, from tard, to smart, suddenly? Don't fuck up at understanding either global warming or AGW, screw up at predicting the consequences, and then bullshit your way into thinking you are somehow bright enough, to understand economics, with your head up your own butt and wiggling.

If you can't understand AGW or baseball, look, dude! Don't bullshit people, about economics.

FinanceGraph.png


As this graph clearly shows global warming is inversely correlated to nebulus trending carbon processes exacerbated by nitrous infarction
 

Forum List

Back
Top