Dagosa
Gold Member
- Oct 22, 2012
- 22,594
- 6,158
- 198
Denier…![]()
![]()
So the massive ice loss due exclusively to AGW is coincidentally located above the area of undersea volcanoes
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Denier…![]()
![]()
So the massive ice loss due exclusively to AGW is coincidentally located above the area of undersea volcanoes
Calling someone a "denier" for disagreeing with your "Consensus" is NOT science, it's a Cult.Denier…
What’s that ? An admission that you are a denier of every climate science institute in the world ?Calling someone a "denier" for disagreeing with your "Consensus" is NOT science, it's a Cult.
You post like a 10 year oldWhat’s that ? An admission that you are a denier of every climate science institute in the world ?
The same 10 year who can’t show any evidence of his claims ? My claim is simple. All ice sheets whether sea or glacial ice everywhere, are receding. There is no climate science research facility that says differently.You post like a 10 year old
You have no argument. Both sea ice and land or glacial ice are receding.Sea ice is not significant.
Earth ice
90% on land mass Antarctica
7% on land mass Greenland
0.3% on land mass Ellesmere Island
the rest, 2.7% is mountain tops and sea ice...
Where is the ice = on LAND WITHIN 600 miles of a pole.... and LAND MOVES....
Now you’re yelling. Btw, “ consensus “ is an apt word and why you’re afraid of it. When you argue against legitimate words used in the dictionary, you’re a loser.Calling someone a "denier" for disagreeing with your "Consensus" is NOT science, it's a Cult.
Now you’re yelling. Btw, “ consensus “ is an apt word and why you’re afraid of it. When you argue against legitimate words used in the dictionary, you’re a loser.
I think first you need to demonstrate you're not a really, really bad chatbot.We're still testing general relativity and gravity, but please tell us why the theory that America CO2 is causing undersea volcanoes and melting the ice caps remains unassailable
I think first you need to demonstrate you're not a really, really bad chatbot.
More woo woo.We're still testing general relativity and gravity, but please tell us why the theory that America CO2 is causing undersea volcanoes and melting the ice caps remains unassailable
All ice sheets are melting whether they are near volcanoes of Trumps fat ass.You post a SCARY CO2 is Melting Antarctica chart, I reply with an image showing the SCARY melting is precisely the same location as undersea volcanoes, but I'm a bot?
Tell us WHERE THE IMAGE CAME FROM. POST THE LINK. Otherwise denier, you’re just tryin* to use NASA to discredit NASA…..That means you’re a fraud. You say you trust NASA sponsored observations to discredit them which is a typical denier ploy. You don’t do shit on your own.You post a SCARY CO2 is Melting Antarctica chart, I reply with an image showing the SCARY melting is precisely the same location as undersea volcanoes, but I'm a bot?
Wait I thought the "Science was settled" on the American CO2 is killing the polar bears "theory? Is the "Science" no longer "settled"?More woo woo.
If you knew anything about science you’d know all theories are generally tested and revised. That’s why they are called theories, dah. The huge differences between you denier bozos and the dullards you trot out there is, NONE are conducting any trials and collecting evidence themselves. This is why we have large institutions and consensus science on ALL MAJOR ISSUES. You’re infantile BS is hilarious. Leave it to the big boys or join them and actually do the work.
More made up shit. You have your little key words you take out of context with no link. You’re science illiterate. You can’t can you.Wait I thought the "Science was settled" on the American CO2 is killing the polar bears "theory? Is the "Science" no longer "settled"?
You shouldn't take LSD before posting
What is it that you're "testing"?More made up shit. You have your little key words you take out of context with no link. You’re science illiterate. You can’t can you.
That's your problem. You’re thinking again.Wait I thought the "Science was settled" on the American CO2 is killing the polar bears "theory? Is the "Science" no longer "settled"?
That's your problem. You’re thinking again.