Old Rocks
Diamond Member
Lying again, as per usual. Without lies, you would be unable to post, here is the reality;Sorry. I followed the link and it says solar and wind are subsidized and thee most expensive form of electricity

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lying again, as per usual. Without lies, you would be unable to post, here is the reality;Sorry. I followed the link and it says solar and wind are subsidized and thee most expensive form of electricity
Ah well, some will be purposely stupid just to support and unsupportable point. Do you know why it is called a grid? Do you suppose that Chicago is not connected to parts of the US that has ample power? You are really going down the rabbit hole in your dislike of solar.You can also charge that battery off the grid at night with prices are low, and use it for the peak hours
Oh, so I can use my neighbor's excess solar, when I have none in the day time (and neither does he) and he can recharge from the nat gas grid at night, when neither of us has solar.
Am I borrowing from him at night too?
Ah well, some will be purposely stupid just to support and unsupportable point. Do you know why it is called a grid? Do you suppose that Chicago is not connected to parts of the US that has ample power? You are really going down the rabbit hole in your dislike of solar.
LOL you ldiotLinks don't prove shit. As you have proven.
Many of us watch the news and have heard AOC and Bernie sanders state the price is $100 trillion.
Funny thing is, you never actually post what the cost has been, is, and will be, yet you challenge me to prove something you don't know a thing about.
Yes, if Google will not link or allow the comment made, to be found, then it is not true.
Google is the truth.
Here's the renewables on the UK -If you live in California, and have a $400 a month power bill, and are dissing solar, you are one stupid mother.
Nuclear is the way forward. Those against nuclear harness the power via PV's from an extremely large nuclear reactor, the Sun.Global Investment in Wind and Solar Outshines Fossil Fuels
or, in plain english
Global investment in Wind and Solar is Extremely Expensive Compared to Fossil Fuels
of course there is more money spent on wind and solar which only offer a tiny trickle of electricity. You must build by the square mile, for years, before we even have a small percentage of our electricity come from wind or solar
AOC green new deal, as confirmed by ceres.orgLOL you ldiot
Sanders' "100 Trillion" is for his whole agenda, not just 'Climate.'
16 Trillion was for Climate.
Why don't you know how to use google?
You are Willfully Ignorant.
It's so easy to get info/FACTS these days yet you Don't.
Stupid? Partisan Lazy just throwing up numbers?
Is Sanders' 'plan' everyone's?
What will staying all Fossil cost?
Does solar cost much less very year? Down 85% in a decade?
IAC
"..The $97.5 trillion price tag is made up mostly of the costs of Sanders’s THREE most ambitious proposals. Sanders concedes that his Medicare For All plan would increase federal spending by “somewhere between $30 and $40 trillion over a 10-year period.”He pledges to spend $16.3 trillion on his climate plan. And his proposal to guarantee all Americans a full-time government job paying $15 an hour, with full benefits, is estimated to cost $30.1 trillion.The final $11.1 trillion includes $3 trillion to forgive all student loans and guarantee free public-college tuition—plus $1.8 trillion to expand Social Security, $2.5 trillion on housing, $1.6 trillion on paid family leave, $1 trillion on infrastructure, $800 billion on general K-12 education spending, and an additional $400 billion on higher public school teacher salaries.![]()
The Unaffordable Candidate
It’s been a difficult time for Senator Bernie Sanders, who was hospitalized two weeks ago after suffering a heart attack and whose 46-year-old daughter-in-law has recently died of cancer. Given Sanders’s age (78) and health and familial challenges, his quest for the Democratic presidential...www.city-journal.org
So that it's really 16 Trillion over 10 years by the most Left wing proposer.
But In fact, the GND is happening without Govt help.
It is exploding because it's economical.
So look before you throw sh*t/LIES up next time
You and the other *holes post NO facts.
`
That is not Aba dabba do's link, which I addressed.Lying again, as per usual. Without lies, you would be unable to post, here is the reality;
View attachment 585953
![]()
Amazing how Lefties always perceive disaster, and they can fix it with money?Here is one of many clean green renewable the sky is falling websites stating we must spend $100 trillion.
![]()
The $100 trillion question
INTERVIEW WITH JOEL SOLOMON, CO-FOUNDING PARTNER, RENEWAL FUNDS Q. Your book is called The Clean Money Revolution: Reinventing Power, Purpose, and Capitalism. What kind of economic revolutionary change would you like to see? We must prioritise fair and equal opportunity. Investment in women...www.theclimatechangeproject.today
Amazing how righties always perceive conspiracies to change things unnecessarily and steal their money in the process.
I reject all of them. They aren't facts. They are leftwing hysteria.Amazing how righties always perceive conspiracies to change things unnecessarily and steal their money in the process.
1) Global warming is an extremely serious problem
2) Global warming is the result of human combustion of fossil fuels
3) Humans can end global warming by ceasing to burn fossil fuels
4) Doing so cannot happen without significant investment in infrastructure change
Which of these facts do you reject?
1) all predictions of problems caused have not materialized. Zero proof that a warmer climate is bad.Amazing how righties always perceive conspiracies to change things unnecessarily and steal their money in the process.
1) Global warming is an extremely serious problem
2) Global warming is the result of human combustion of fossil fuels
3) Humans can end global warming by ceasing to burn fossil fuels
4) Doing so cannot happen without significant investment in infrastructure change
Which of these facts do you reject?
post one prediction that has come true.Amazing how righties always perceive conspiracies to change things unnecessarily and steal their money in the process.
1) Global warming is an extremely serious problem
2) Global warming is the result of human combustion of fossil fuels
3) Humans can end global warming by ceasing to burn fossil fuels
4) Doing so cannot happen without significant investment in infrastructure change
Which of these facts do you reject?
You perceive global warming (I thought it was called climate change) to be so important, you still make use of fossil fuels and items derived/built by using fossil fuels.Amazing how righties always perceive conspiracies to change things unnecessarily and steal their money in the process.
1) Global warming is an extremely serious problem
2) Global warming is the result of human combustion of fossil fuels
3) Humans can end global warming by ceasing to burn fossil fuels
4) Doing so cannot happen without significant investment in infrastructure change
Which of these facts do you reject?
Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University in the world has policy statements that AGW is real and a clear and present danger. Against that we have bozos with less than a third grade science education making unsupported claims. LOL Oh, who to believe.I reject all of them. They aren't facts. They are leftwing hysteria.
Good to see you described yourself as a bozo, Mr Copy and Paste Brochure Guy.Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University in the world has policy statements that AGW is real and a clear and present danger. Against that we have bozos with less than a third grade science education making unsupported claims. LOL Oh, who to believe.