Giuliani: No 'Successful Radical Islamic' US Terror Attacks Before Obama

[rightwinger]

Giuliani: No 'Successful Radical Islamic' US Terror Attacks Before Obama

Sounds like Trump has several "Tokyo Roses" on his team.

Aren't you scumbags supposed to be the tolerant ones about queers?....Thanks for blowing up that myth

Rudy and Trump are queers?

<not that there is anything wrong with that>





x

 

[Vigilante]

Giuliani: No 'Successful Radical Islamic' US Terror Attacks Before Obama

Sounds like Trump has several "Tokyo Roses" on his team.

Aren't you scumbags supposed to be the tolerant ones about queers?....Thanks for blowing up that myth

We are tolerant of LGBTs. Why do you think they vote Democrat?

For the same reason blacks vote demoRAT...most are too brainwashed to realize you scumbag do nothing to help them....Nothing like having the shooter of The Pulse clubs father sitting right behind your candidate in her Fla. Rally!

 

[Faun]

if that's what he meant, that's just fine.

so would he have been right even if we were to believe that he meant since 9/11/01?

Stop dancing and answer the question:

"So now you answer a question. Do you seriously not realize when he said 8 years, he was referring specifically to 9/11? You really, truly didn't get that?"

i think it's highly unlikely that rudy "i was mayor on 9/11" giuliani forgot about the 9/11 attacks,yes.

the point is whether he realized that those attacks fell within the given time frame or not is irrelevant - he still would be wrong even if we ignore the 9/11/01 attacks.

now are you able to admit that giuliani was wrong either way?

Actually you would still be wrong. You said the attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon happened within the timeframe, which means if you got that he was referring to 9/11, you lied. And if you didn't get it, you're a complete idiot.

So which is it? Are you a liar or a complete idiot?

those attacks did happen during the time frame he gave. now if we are generous enough to say that he misspoke and meant since 9/11/01 it doesn't really change anything because his statement is still factually wrong.

what was i wrong about?

They are only in the timeframe he gave if you don't grasp he was referring to 9/11. And that would take an imbecile of epic proportions.

You're splitting hairs, there is no "truth" in that

They were within the time frame he was talking about whether you include 9.11 or not. What the **** are you kazzing about now?

 

[Vigilante]

Stop dancing and answer the question:

"So now you answer a question. Do you seriously not realize when he said 8 years, he was referring specifically to 9/11? You really, truly didn't get that?"

i think it's highly unlikely that rudy "i was mayor on 9/11" giuliani forgot about the 9/11 attacks,yes.

the point is whether he realized that those attacks fell within the given time frame or not is irrelevant - he still would be wrong even if we ignore the 9/11/01 attacks.

now are you able to admit that giuliani was wrong either way?

Actually you would still be wrong. You said the attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon happened within the timeframe, which means if you got that he was referring to 9/11, you lied. And if you didn't get it, you're a complete idiot.

So which is it? Are you a liar or a complete idiot?

those attacks did happen during the time frame he gave. now if we are generous enough to say that he misspoke and meant since 9/11/01 it doesn't really change anything because his statement is still factually wrong.

what was i wrong about?

They are only in the timeframe he gave if you don't grasp he was referring to 9/11. And that would take an imbecile of epic proportions.

You're splitting hairs, there is no "truth" in that

They were within the time frame he was talking about whether you include 9.11 or not. What the **** are you kazzing about now?

Your simply wrong as usual...spam boy

 

[g5000]

And the missile theory has been debunked.

LOL!!!

No it hasn't since the "757 theory" is what inspired "Pilots for 911 truth" because

1. a 757 simply cannot go 400 mph at ground level
2. the position of the hole in the Pentagon puts the 757's engines IN THE GROUND
3. a 757 is not a projectile, it is a floating soda can, and would have bounced off

Please explain how thousands of military experts in the PENTAGON were tricked into bleeving a cruise missile was a 757.

 

[ogibillm]

i think it's highly unlikely that rudy "i was mayor on 9/11" giuliani forgot about the 9/11 attacks,yes.

the point is whether he realized that those attacks fell within the given time frame or not is irrelevant - he still would be wrong even if we ignore the 9/11/01 attacks.

now are you able to admit that giuliani was wrong either way?

Actually you would still be wrong. You said the attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon happened within the timeframe, which means if you got that he was referring to 9/11, you lied. And if you didn't get it, you're a complete idiot.

So which is it? Are you a liar or a complete idiot?

those attacks did happen during the time frame he gave. now if we are generous enough to say that he misspoke and meant since 9/11/01 it doesn't really change anything because his statement is still factually wrong.

what was i wrong about?

They are only in the timeframe he gave if you don't grasp he was referring to 9/11. And that would take an imbecile of epic proportions.

You're splitting hairs, there is no "truth" in that

They were within the time frame he was talking about whether you include 9.11 or not. What the **** are you kazzing about now?

Your simply wrong as usual...spam boy

no, Faun is right, kaz was and is wrong and refuses to admit that there were successful terrorist attacks in the u.s. after 9/11/01 and before obama's inauguration.

 

[Lakhota]

Giuliani: No 'Successful Radical Islamic' US Terror Attacks Before Obama

Sounds like Trump has several "Tokyo Roses" on his team.

Aren't you scumbags supposed to be the tolerant ones about queers?....Thanks for blowing up that myth

We are tolerant of LGBTs. Why do you think they vote Democrat?

For the same reason blacks vote demoRAT...most are too brainwashed to realize you scumbag do nothing to help them....Nothing like having the shooter of The Pulse clubs father sitting right behind your candidate in her Fla. Rally!

Well, Mark Foley wasn't available.

 

[g5000]

Once again, for the tards:


1993 shootings at CIA Headquarters

1993 World Trade Center bombing

1994 Brooklyn Bridge shooting

2000 Conservative Synagogue Adath Israel of Riverdale

September 11, 2001 attacks

CNN.com - FBI, Justice: El Al attack was terrorism - Apr. 12, 2003

2006 UNC SUV attack

2006 Seattle Jewish Federation shooting

 

[Faun]

kaz are you ever going to admit that giuliani was wrong?

Asked and answered.

You didn't grasp his obvious reference to 9/11 and you blasted him for saying eight years when it was seven and a half.

You don't grasp his point that terrorism in the US has skyrocketed since Obama took office.

Sure, he used broad enough words that an anal hair splitter can quibble with his exact terms, but yes, his point was overwhelmingly correct.

How many times do you want me to repeat that?

You're still kazzing. Giuliani didn't say that terrorism in the U.S. "skyrocketed" under Obama; he said it began when Clinton and Obama took office.

 

[g5000]

You don't grasp his point that terrorism in the US has skyrocketed since Obama took office.

No it hasn't.

Idiot.

 

[bendog]

If there's a god Trump and Rudy won't even get air time on Fox after Nov.

And it will be interesting to see if Trump has killed his own brand. Who the hell wants a casino with a loser's name on it. LOL

 

[Vigilante]

Actually you would still be wrong. You said the attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon happened within the timeframe, which means if you got that he was referring to 9/11, you lied. And if you didn't get it, you're a complete idiot.

So which is it? Are you a liar or a complete idiot?

those attacks did happen during the time frame he gave. now if we are generous enough to say that he misspoke and meant since 9/11/01 it doesn't really change anything because his statement is still factually wrong.

what was i wrong about?

They are only in the timeframe he gave if you don't grasp he was referring to 9/11. And that would take an imbecile of epic proportions.

You're splitting hairs, there is no "truth" in that

They were within the time frame he was talking about whether you include 9.11 or not. What the **** are you kazzing about now?

Your simply wrong as usual...spam boy

no, Faun is right, kaz was and is wrong and refuses to admit that there were successful terrorist attacks in the u.s. after 9/11/01 and before obama's inauguration.

Try to keep up...Pawn stated isis started in 2006 and it didn't...it was 1999 under The Clintons!

 

[Vigilante]

Giuliani: No 'Successful Radical Islamic' US Terror Attacks Before Obama

Sounds like Trump has several "Tokyo Roses" on his team.

Aren't you scumbags supposed to be the tolerant ones about queers?....Thanks for blowing up that myth

We are tolerant of LGBTs. Why do you think they vote Democrat?

For the same reason blacks vote demoRAT...most are too brainwashed to realize you scumbag do nothing to help them....Nothing like having the shooter of The Pulse clubs father sitting right behind your candidate in her Fla. Rally!

Well, Mark Foley wasn't available.

And YOU would know!

 

[Faun]

i think it's highly unlikely that rudy "i was mayor on 9/11" giuliani forgot about the 9/11 attacks,yes.

the point is whether he realized that those attacks fell within the given time frame or not is irrelevant - he still would be wrong even if we ignore the 9/11/01 attacks.

now are you able to admit that giuliani was wrong either way?

Actually you would still be wrong. You said the attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon happened within the timeframe, which means if you got that he was referring to 9/11, you lied. And if you didn't get it, you're a complete idiot.

So which is it? Are you a liar or a complete idiot?

those attacks did happen during the time frame he gave. now if we are generous enough to say that he misspoke and meant since 9/11/01 it doesn't really change anything because his statement is still factually wrong.

what was i wrong about?

They are only in the timeframe he gave if you don't grasp he was referring to 9/11. And that would take an imbecile of epic proportions.

You're splitting hairs, there is no "truth" in that

They were within the time frame he was talking about whether you include 9.11 or not. What the **** are you kazzing about now?

Your simply wrong as usual...spam boy

Hisses the self-proclaimed 3 digit IQ imbecile who can't even spell, "you're."

Moron.... there were several attacks inside the U.S. between 9.11 and Obama becoming president. They've been listed several times in this thread. If you could comprehend what you read, you would have known that.

 

[Vigilante]

Actually you would still be wrong. You said the attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon happened within the timeframe, which means if you got that he was referring to 9/11, you lied. And if you didn't get it, you're a complete idiot.

So which is it? Are you a liar or a complete idiot?

those attacks did happen during the time frame he gave. now if we are generous enough to say that he misspoke and meant since 9/11/01 it doesn't really change anything because his statement is still factually wrong.

what was i wrong about?

They are only in the timeframe he gave if you don't grasp he was referring to 9/11. And that would take an imbecile of epic proportions.

You're splitting hairs, there is no "truth" in that

They were within the time frame he was talking about whether you include 9.11 or not. What the **** are you kazzing about now?

Your simply wrong as usual...spam boy

Hisses the self-proclaimed 3 digit IQ imbecile who can't even spell, "you're."

Moron.... there were several attacks inside the U.S. between 9.11 and Obama becoming president. They've been listed several times in this thread. If you could comprehend what you read, you would have known that.

You stated isis started in 2006 and you are wrong!.... This to difficult for you?

 

[AceRothstein]

Giuliani has gotten progressively worse with his insanity over the last 15 years. He might need to be committed soon.

 

[kaz]

kaz are you ever going to admit that giuliani was wrong?

Asked and answered.

You didn't grasp his obvious reference to 9/11 and you blasted him for saying eight years when it was seven and a half.

You don't grasp his point that terrorism in the US has skyrocketed since Obama took office.

Sure, he used broad enough words that an anal hair splitter can quibble with his exact terms, but yes, his point was overwhelmingly correct.

How many times do you want me to repeat that?

have you answered it? where?

do you understand that there were terror attacks in the united states after 9/11 but before president obama's inauguration?

Well, so Giuliani said 0 in 8 years if you want to hold him to the ridiculously extreme standard that he didn't mean and you want to hold him to.

You came back with examples covering 1 death in 6 years. Sounds like he's way closer than you are to being honest

 

[kaz]

i think it's highly unlikely that rudy "i was mayor on 9/11" giuliani forgot about the 9/11 attacks,yes.

the point is whether he realized that those attacks fell within the given time frame or not is irrelevant - he still would be wrong even if we ignore the 9/11/01 attacks.

now are you able to admit that giuliani was wrong either way?

Actually you would still be wrong. You said the attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon happened within the timeframe, which means if you got that he was referring to 9/11, you lied. And if you didn't get it, you're a complete idiot.

So which is it? Are you a liar or a complete idiot?

those attacks did happen during the time frame he gave. now if we are generous enough to say that he misspoke and meant since 9/11/01 it doesn't really change anything because his statement is still factually wrong.

what was i wrong about?

They are only in the timeframe he gave if you don't grasp he was referring to 9/11. And that would take an imbecile of epic proportions.

You're splitting hairs, there is no "truth" in that

They were within the time frame he was talking about whether you include 9.11 or not. What the **** are you kazzing about now?

Your simply wrong as usual...spam boy

I have the putz on ignore and he knows that. Thanks for calling him on his crap

 

[kaz]

Actually you would still be wrong. You said the attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon happened within the timeframe, which means if you got that he was referring to 9/11, you lied. And if you didn't get it, you're a complete idiot.

So which is it? Are you a liar or a complete idiot?

those attacks did happen during the time frame he gave. now if we are generous enough to say that he misspoke and meant since 9/11/01 it doesn't really change anything because his statement is still factually wrong.

what was i wrong about?

They are only in the timeframe he gave if you don't grasp he was referring to 9/11. And that would take an imbecile of epic proportions.

You're splitting hairs, there is no "truth" in that

They were within the time frame he was talking about whether you include 9.11 or not. What the **** are you kazzing about now?

Your simply wrong as usual...spam boy

no, Faun is right, kaz was and is wrong and refuses to admit that there were successful terrorist attacks in the u.s. after 9/11/01 and before obama's inauguration.

You came up with four attacks and twelve deaths in 7.5 years, and only one of those was in the last six. Giuliani wasn't trying to split that hair, he was saying how few attacks there were until Obama took over. He was right

 

[LaDexter]

Timeline:

Israel murders our Marines
Israel blames Hezbo, "US" media eggs on a US war against Hezbo
Reagan Administration rules out Hezbo as a suspect
Israel and the "US" media then fudge "Islamic Jihad" as the "latest suspect"
"Islamic Jihad" next appears... 20 years later on episode 17 of TV show "24"


Those inside the Reagan Administration say the truck was remote controlled....