bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,419
- 2,180
It says right at the bottom of his post that he's using an iPhone, moron.
Giuliani drops another Biden bomb: "Keep your eye on Romania'
- Thread starter The Purge
- Start date
- Moderator
- #102
Let me guess. This is your 857th "bombshell" that we'll never hear about again, right?
- Dec 16, 2017
- 23,127
- 12,529
- 1,290
Clinton impeachment timeline
House judiciary starts impeachment inquiry for bill Clinton.
Impeachment process against Richard Nixon - Wikipedia
House judiciary starts impeachment inquiry for Nixon.
It's how the process work. Judiciary votes to start an impeachment inquiry, they write the articles of impeachment, and submit then to the full house where a vote is taken. If it passes, then impeachment moves forward.
The Original Tree
Diamond Member
All the liberals on this forum if you read their posts closely are either gay, or are dirty old men who oggle children.
The Original Tree
Diamond Member
It goes without saying that The Articles of Impeachment are based on The Special Counsels Recommendations for Indictment and Mad Moscow Mueller made none.
BlindBoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 58,611
- 17,585
- 2,250
How the House gets there is entirely up to the chamber itself to determine. There is no constitutional requirement that the House take two successful votes on impeachment, one to authorize some kind of inquiry and one to ratify whatever emerges from that inquiry. An impeachment inquiry is not “invalid” because there has been no vote to formally launch it, and any eventual impeachment would not be “invalid” because the process that led to it did not feature a floor vote authorizing a specific inquiry.
Of course, the House’s own rules might require such a vote, and the House must follow its own rules until it chooses to change them. But there is no rule requiring such an authorizing vote, and neither McCarthy nor Cipollone points to one. The House has changed its internal procedures dramatically over time. At one point, the House did not rely on standing committees but instead created select committees to handle many legislative tasks. Through much of its history, the House has limited the investigatory powers of its standing committees and required that those committees go to the floor to receive special authorization to issue subpoenas or spend substantial resources on staff. It no longer does so, and so it no longer needs to take such votes to specially authorize particular investigations. The House might want a select committee to pursue an impeachment inquiry, but it could also choose to rely on its standing committees to do the job with their preexisting jurisdiction and resources—and that is how the Democratic leadership has decided to approach the current impeachment inquiry. It is not up to the target of an impeachment to determine who will compose the committee that will draft the articles of impeachment or who will chair that committee.
Must the House Vote to Authorize an Impeachment Inquiry?
Again, the Special Counsel Law has expired. Mueller worked for the Executive Branch and did not submit his findings and evidence to Congress.
The Original Tree
Diamond Member
He could have. The President did it for him. There were no Recommendations for Indictment. So suck on that egg traitor.
Mueller is a big dummy, and a crook, but he isn't stupid enough to tie a noose around his own neck to hang an innocent man with such a high profile and ability to fight back.
Mueller was selected because he has put innocent men in jail multiple times, and is not an honest man. People like him are only honest when the whole world is watching, and that is why there were no recommendations for indictment.
Sucks to be you, looking to overturn an election and still not being able to launch a successful COUP three years in to your Rebellion.
BlindBoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 58,611
- 17,585
- 2,250
No, the charge was explicit as to who he reported to. Trumpybear has stonewalled and withheld nearly all the evidence Mueller gathered that Congress has requested. The report itself is damning to he unpatriotic president.
Mueller is a lifelong Republican. Combat hardened, hard charging Marine.
The only Coup that happened is Putin's Poop Coup, with Trumpybear as the lead. The country will have it's chance to overturn 2016 soon enough, well not soon enough for the our former allies, the Kurds who helped defeated ISIS with their lives.
The Original Tree
Diamond Member
There is no Evidence Being With Held.
Care to list what evidence is being with held? The President did not even have to release one page of The Mueller Toilet Paper Report.
What kind of dope are you smoking today? You smoking that THC Oil?
And why exactly do you want America involved in skirmishes 7,000 miles away between people who have been fighting with each other for 2,000 years?
Only The Deep State wants Endless War.
BlindBoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 58,611
- 17,585
- 2,250
The Justice Department told a federal judge that a House committee investigating President Donald Trump is not entitled to grand jury evidence from special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation, saying it has failed to explain which specific testimony it needs access to or how it would help its investigation into potential obstruction by the president.
"There is this generalized notion that this is an important matter because of impeachment and, therefore, (the committee) should have access to everything," Elizabeth Shapiro, an attorney in the Justice Department's Civil Division, said during a two-hour hearing in federal court Tuesday. "It also needs to be particularized, and they shouldn't get a pass on that because of impeachment."
U.S. District Court Judge Beryl Howell heard arguments on whether the House Judiciary Committee should receive the underlying grand jury evidence behind Mueller’s report on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.
Impeachment inquiry doesn't entitle House committee to grand jury evidence in Mueller report, DOJ says
Since the Great Obama masterfully allied with like minded forces in the region to contain and finally deny ISIS any territory, Trumpybear, has no use for historical or significant alliances. Ergodon probable said something like "You know Donnie, it would be a shame if something were to happen to those beautiful Trumpybear Towers we have. How about you remove your forces and let me bomb the shit out of your former Kurd Allies. (Knudge Knudge)
Purple Kush Kief why?
Last edited:
BlindBoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 58,611
- 17,585
- 2,250
That's how the process worked in the past. House procedures have changed. They don't need to call any special committee. The committees already have all the power they need to do the investigations.
Unkotare
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2011
- 145,600
- 32,667
- 2,180
Give it a ******* rest crying “civil war!” all the damn time.
Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 90,937
- 45,473
- 2,615
That’s how the process worked 20 years ago - 50 years ago. The rules have changed
They were changed by the way... by Republicans
- Dec 16, 2017
- 23,127
- 12,529
- 1,290
There are no rules, actually, on how impeachments are to be conducted. However, we do have precedent, both in the clinton and Nixon impeachments.
basquebromance
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2015
- 109,396
- 27,171
- 2,220
- Banned
- #115
Trump lawyer Giuliani got paid to lobby Romanian president
The former New York mayor’s letter goes against the State Department stance on corruption in Bucharest.
www.politico.eu
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
-
-
Fourth-quarter GDP revised down to just 0.7% growth; January core inflation was 3.1%- Started by Zincwarrior
- Replies: 2
