Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 120,985
- 127,478
- 3,645
Actually dumbass, it was a syllogism.It doesn't follow from what? A syllogism requires at least one premise before the conclusion, moron.
Your implied conditional statement (your dubious premise) is, "If subjective..., then ... all fraud"
You then, in your typically truncated intellectual fashion, and in broken English, asserted the truth of the hypothesis, then stated conclusion of your syllogism as "therefore, fraud".
Do yourself a favor, and don't ever try to argue with educated people about logic.