- Oct 12, 2009
- 7,763
- 7,304
- 1,985
Evidently there is no ban or your post would have been banned. OTOH, are you so certain this man IS the whistleblower? What if he is not? Who told you? After all the testimony from people who were there, why is it important to vilify this man except to squelch a process necessary when officials ignore addressing an issue or more importantly, deep-six concerns.can real bans be far away?
I know, we will hear the progs step up and talk about private company rights, something they only believe in when companies are imposing the will of the State to work against fundamental freedom...
anyway, am I the only one who isn't surprised by what the whistle-blower looks like? Do they produce soy boys in some type of factory?
If he wasn't the whistleblower he would be all over the MSM defending himself, CNN would give him a job and prop him up as a hero. In the very lest if he wasn't the WB he would have hired a lawyer to give a public statement stating he's not the WB.