Soupnazi630
Gold Member
- Dec 9, 2013
- 19,270
- 5,667
- 265
Fictional you tube videos are not evidence.
There was nothing impossible about what the plane did.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just think this board would have half the people on it if half of them were not getting paid. We do research we know what the fuck is going on a plane can not fly at 500 miles hr. as far as the parts go what fucking parts LOL fuck off
link to any air liner that can fly 500 at ground level.
It's easy when you have no intention of landing safelylink to any air liner that can fly 500 at ground level.
Already done.link to any air liner that can fly 500 at ground level.
link to any air liner that can fly 500 at ground level.
they found landing gear inside the building
The only thing that PARROTING has ever proven is that the individual doing the PARROTING has a BIRDBRAIN.
"They" lied about everything....
Mental illness mostly starts by going to a church and learning never to question anything....
You know, it's kinda fun to watch you disprove your own stuff. In the top quoted post, you asked if it would be possible for a large aircraft to leave such a small hole. Only thing is, you showed only a portion of the wreck site, because the hole that is in your first post was in the second ring from the outside of the Pentagon.
In your second post that I quoted, you showed an aerial picture, which clearly shows that the entire outside ring where the plane impacted was destroyed, with a hole being on the second ring.
Yeah, the hole in your first post that I quoted was kinda small, but that is because it already went through an entire ring of the Pentagon. Ever been there? I have, and I can tell you that those rings around the outside are actually pretty large. They are about 4 stores tall and are about the width of a highway.
And, like I said, from your aerial photo, most of the impact appears to have been taken up by the outer ring.
you showed an aerial picture, which clearly shows that the entire outside ring where the plane impacted was destroyed, with a hole being on the second ring.
What is shows is NO PLANE DEBRIS, proving that Zionist Traitors Photo-Shopped those photos to splice in "plane debris" that was never there.
a HOLE with no plane debris,as always you prove what a moron you are.hee hee.
This is the hole. Is it big enough for a 757?
NOT EVEN CLOSE....
![]()
No liar, this is the hole:
View attachment 167646
Plenty big enough. You just outed yourself as a lunatic liar.
The skill it would take to fly a plane as close to the ground as the vidio shows would be tremendous for a cesna. I can not immagine trying it with a 747. While I am a pilot, I am not near as skilled as my uncle who was a fighter pilot in nam. I will show him the vidio and see what he sais. My prediction is, he will say impoossable. That is an angle I have never seen on an approach.
A 757. As demonstrated by the plane wreckage consistent with an AMerican Airlines 757 being found around and in the building, along with the bodies of passengers from that 757, plus the black boxes from that 757 found in the Pentagon wreckage.
if you look at the cone to the far right, you can see the shape of a plane.
if it was a missal, thee would be flames coming out the back and be much smaller.
You have crazy good eyes, I watched several times and could not find the plane or what ever it is, till told where to look.