Getting 911 correct - simple question

[Skylar]

If our president back on 9/11 had BALLS or channeled Harry Truman, Saudi Arabia would have turned into glass hours after 9/11. Still, we let them get away outrageous provocations like mass murder and a act of war. WHY? Why did we attack Iraq instead? WHY? What the hell did Iraq have to do with ANYTHING?

That would have been remarkably stupid.

First, we didn't get attacked by Saudi Arabia. We were attacked by individual Saudis. Attacking Saudi Arabia after 911 would make as much sense as nuking Washington DC after Oklahoma City.

Second, Saudi Arabia is our closest ally in the region. Attacking them would have been akin to attacking say, the UK in terms of strategic insanity. We would have lost the trust of every nation on earth, including our allies. As if we would nuke our closest allies, we can't be trusted not to attack anyone.

Third, Saudi Arabia contains Mecca, the holiest site in Islam. Destroying it would been a declaration of war on over a billion people.

Fourth, it took weeks to figure out exactly what had happened and support that with evidence. Nuking Saudi Arabia 'within hours' would have been done evidence free. We literally would have violated the nuclear taboo on a hunch.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

If our president back on 9/11 had BALLS or channeled Harry Truman, Saudi Arabia would have turned into glass hours after 9/11. Still, we let them get away outrageous provocations like mass murder and a act of war. WHY? Why did we attack Iraq instead? WHY? What the hell did Iraq have to do with ANYTHING?

Saudi Arabia did not attack us you ignorant POS! We would have killed millions of innocent people because of where the terrorists were born? I guess you would support killing everyone from Mexico because some are here illegally in the uS and commit murders!

We didn't attack Iraq until 18 months AFTER 9/11! Grow up and catch a clue!

There is no excuse for being that stupid!

Really. Despite the fact it was funded by, and most of the attackers were from Saudi Arabia. Their fingerprints were all over 9/11. What the hell WAS Iraq about? A diversion, and, it's working with some of you jokers. Saudi Arabia was the perpetrator of the terrorist attacks on America. It isn't that hard, folks.

Saudi Arabia hunted down Al qaeda terrorists. What was to gain by attacking the US for the Saudi Government? Without our help, they would be open to attack by Iran at their leisure?

By the same reasoning, why would we attack the Saudi people for what a few of their countryman did? Using that logic, we should have executed every single Japanese-American after Pearl Harbor.

You have been reading too many conspiracy theories and not doing enough thinking on your own, if that is possible.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

If our president back on 9/11 had BALLS or channeled Harry Truman, Saudi Arabia would have turned into glass hours after 9/11. Still, we let them get away outrageous provocations like mass murder and a act of war. WHY? Why did we attack Iraq instead? WHY? What the hell did Iraq have to do with ANYTHING?

Saudi Arabia did not attack us you ignorant POS! We would have killed millions of innocent people because of where the terrorists were born? I guess you would support killing everyone from Mexico because some are here illegally in the uS and commit murders!

We didn't attack Iraq until 18 months AFTER 9/11! Grow up and catch a clue!

There is no excuse for being that stupid!

Really. Despite the fact it was funded by, and most of the attackers were from Saudi Arabia. Their fingerprints were all over 9/11. What the hell WAS Iraq about? A diversion, and, it's working with some of you jokers. Saudi Arabia was the perpetrator of the terrorist attacks on America. It isn't that hard, folks.

persons from Saudi Arabia did it-----Osama was ETHNICALLY actually Yemeni. The Saudi government did
not do it. ISLAMICISTS did it-----of course, Saudi Arabia is chock full of Islamic nuts------the kids are
brainwashed. BUT ----I have known some educated Saudis who were very fine people and were very much aware of the filth they were fed as kids in school

At this point, it matters little. Japanese general Shegekuni Yamamato was schooled in America and still he lead the attack on Pearl harbor.

That was an act for which he was most ashamed and he died as a result of that war.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Saudi Arabia did not attack us you ignorant POS! We would have killed millions of innocent people because of where the terrorists were born? I guess you would support killing everyone from Mexico because some are here illegally in the uS and commit murders!

We didn't attack Iraq until 18 months AFTER 9/11! Grow up and catch a clue!

There is no excuse for being that stupid!

Really. Despite the fact it was funded by, and most of the attackers were from Saudi Arabia. Their fingerprints were all over 9/11. What the hell WAS Iraq about? A diversion, and, it's working with some of you jokers. Saudi Arabia was the perpetrator of the terrorist attacks on America. It isn't that hard, folks.

persons from Saudi Arabia did it-----Osama was ETHNICALLY actually Yemeni. The Saudi government did
not do it. ISLAMICISTS did it-----of course, Saudi Arabia is chock full of Islamic nuts------the kids are
brainwashed. BUT ----I have known some educated Saudis who were very fine people and were very much aware of the filth they were fed as kids in school

At this point, it matters little. Japanese general Shegekuni Yamamato was schooled in America and still he lead the attack on Pearl harbor.

SO? that was the POLICY of the JAPANESE government at the time. It was not the POLICY of the
Saudi government to crash planes into the WTC -------sheeeeeeesh Mary-----you DECIDED TO DUMB DOWN?

I have a handle on history, and it isn't that hard. Japan attacked us, Saudi Arabia attacked us. You seem to have a problem with the obvious. Perhaps the Saudis don't play fair and don't include YOU on their playbook? Because actions speak louder than words. 9/11 spoke volumes. The players, the actions. It's all evidence. Saudi Arabia was the bad actor here, plain pure and simple.

No, Saudi Arabia did not attack us. Those were not Saudi government-sponsored terrorists. You are simply wong.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I think the Saudis are not what they seem, the royal family, the government, there it is a undercurrent of Muslim hate against the west. They disguise it. They hide it. The rich religious Muslims that resent the west, that hate the modern world. That think they are the power behind the power. Take the Bin Laden family. Take Osama, for instance. Poor spoilt brat from a rich Saudi family that took his hate of non Muslims much further and took to planning, organizing, funding and ultimately attacking the capitol of evil, er, infidels, (America) in three separate audacious attacks on American soil. To me, that IS Saudi Arabia attacking America, and for that they need to pay.

"spoilt"???

I suggest you go back to school for numerous reasons.

 

[rightwinger]

If our president back on 9/11 had BALLS or channeled Harry Truman, Saudi Arabia would have turned into glass hours after 9/11. Still, we let them get away outrageous provocations like mass murder and a act of war. WHY? Why did we attack Iraq instead? WHY? What the hell did Iraq have to do with ANYTHING?

Saudi Arabia did not attack us you ignorant POS! We would have killed millions of innocent people because of where the terrorists were born? I guess you would support killing everyone from Mexico because some are here illegally in the uS and commit murders!

We didn't attack Iraq until 18 months AFTER 9/11! Grow up and catch a clue!

There is no excuse for being that stupid!

Really. Despite the fact it was funded by, and most of the attackers were from Saudi Arabia. Their fingerprints were all over 9/11. What the hell WAS Iraq about? A diversion, and, it's working with some of you jokers. Saudi Arabia was the perpetrator of the terrorist attacks on America. It isn't that hard, folks.

Saudi Arabia hunted down Al qaeda terrorists. What was to gain by attacking the US for the Saudi Government? Without our help, they would be open to attack by Iran at their leisure?

By the same reasoning, why would we attack the Saudi people for what a few of their countryman did? Using that logic, we should have executed every single Japanese-American after Pearl Harbor.

You have been reading too many conspiracy theories and not doing enough thinking on your own, if that is possible.

Very true

Instead...we attacked Iraq

 

[saltydancin]

At this point, it matters little. Japanese general Shegekuni Yamamato was schooled in America and still he lead the attack on Pearl harbor.

.

Saudi Arabian nationalists and Egyptian nationalists attacked us on 9.11.

While there is not much about the USA educated churchstate attack which operates as this Christian Nation where the second coming for this Christian millennium was Arab terrorists which threatened POTUS & to nuke Temple Mount whom, in all probability were the 9/11 hijackers; which led to patriot act force feeding Islam.

[/QUOTE][/QUOTE][/QUOTE][/QUOTE]

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

If our president back on 9/11 had BALLS or channeled Harry Truman, Saudi Arabia would have turned into glass hours after 9/11. Still, we let them get away outrageous provocations like mass murder and a act of war. WHY? Why did we attack Iraq instead? WHY? What the hell did Iraq have to do with ANYTHING?

Saudi Arabia did not attack us you ignorant POS! We would have killed millions of innocent people because of where the terrorists were born? I guess you would support killing everyone from Mexico because some are here illegally in the uS and commit murders!

We didn't attack Iraq until 18 months AFTER 9/11! Grow up and catch a clue!

There is no excuse for being that stupid!

Really. Despite the fact it was funded by, and most of the attackers were from Saudi Arabia. Their fingerprints were all over 9/11. What the hell WAS Iraq about? A diversion, and, it's working with some of you jokers. Saudi Arabia was the perpetrator of the terrorist attacks on America. It isn't that hard, folks.

Saudi Arabia hunted down Al qaeda terrorists. What was to gain by attacking the US for the Saudi Government? Without our help, they would be open to attack by Iran at their leisure?

By the same reasoning, why would we attack the Saudi people for what a few of their countryman did? Using that logic, we should have executed every single Japanese-American after Pearl Harbor.

You have been reading too many conspiracy theories and not doing enough thinking on your own, if that is possible.

Very true

Instead...we attacked Iraq

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. That's why we never invaded until March of 2003, 18 months later.

 

[Faun]

If our president back on 9/11 had BALLS or channeled Harry Truman, Saudi Arabia would have turned into glass hours after 9/11. Still, we let them get away outrageous provocations like mass murder and a act of war. WHY? Why did we attack Iraq instead? WHY? What the hell did Iraq have to do with ANYTHING?

Saudi Arabia did not attack us you ignorant POS! We would have killed millions of innocent people because of where the terrorists were born? I guess you would support killing everyone from Mexico because some are here illegally in the uS and commit murders!

We didn't attack Iraq until 18 months AFTER 9/11! Grow up and catch a clue!

There is no excuse for being that stupid!

Really. Despite the fact it was funded by, and most of the attackers were from Saudi Arabia. Their fingerprints were all over 9/11. What the hell WAS Iraq about? A diversion, and, it's working with some of you jokers. Saudi Arabia was the perpetrator of the terrorist attacks on America. It isn't that hard, folks.

Saudi Arabia hunted down Al qaeda terrorists. What was to gain by attacking the US for the Saudi Government? Without our help, they would be open to attack by Iran at their leisure?

By the same reasoning, why would we attack the Saudi people for what a few of their countryman did? Using that logic, we should have executed every single Japanese-American after Pearl Harbor.

You have been reading too many conspiracy theories and not doing enough thinking on your own, if that is possible.

Very true

Instead...we attacked Iraq

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. That's why we never invaded until March of 2003, 18 months later.

While it’s true that Iraq had nothing to do with 9.11, the Bush administration tried establishing ties early on. Ultimately, after some 3/4ths of America believed there was a connection, Bush finally had to publicly declare Iraq was not involved.

 

[rightwinger]

If our president back on 9/11 had BALLS or channeled Harry Truman, Saudi Arabia would have turned into glass hours after 9/11. Still, we let them get away outrageous provocations like mass murder and a act of war. WHY? Why did we attack Iraq instead? WHY? What the hell did Iraq have to do with ANYTHING?

Saudi Arabia did not attack us you ignorant POS! We would have killed millions of innocent people because of where the terrorists were born? I guess you would support killing everyone from Mexico because some are here illegally in the uS and commit murders!

We didn't attack Iraq until 18 months AFTER 9/11! Grow up and catch a clue!

There is no excuse for being that stupid!

Really. Despite the fact it was funded by, and most of the attackers were from Saudi Arabia. Their fingerprints were all over 9/11. What the hell WAS Iraq about? A diversion, and, it's working with some of you jokers. Saudi Arabia was the perpetrator of the terrorist attacks on America. It isn't that hard, folks.

Saudi Arabia hunted down Al qaeda terrorists. What was to gain by attacking the US for the Saudi Government? Without our help, they would be open to attack by Iran at their leisure?

By the same reasoning, why would we attack the Saudi people for what a few of their countryman did? Using that logic, we should have executed every single Japanese-American after Pearl Harbor.

You have been reading too many conspiracy theories and not doing enough thinking on your own, if that is possible.

Very true

Instead...we attacked Iraq

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. That's why we never invaded until March of 2003, 18 months later.

No shit

Bush never would have gotten approval to invade Iraq if not for post 9-11 hysteria

"We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud"

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Saudi Arabia did not attack us you ignorant POS! We would have killed millions of innocent people because of where the terrorists were born? I guess you would support killing everyone from Mexico because some are here illegally in the uS and commit murders!

We didn't attack Iraq until 18 months AFTER 9/11! Grow up and catch a clue!

There is no excuse for being that stupid!

Really. Despite the fact it was funded by, and most of the attackers were from Saudi Arabia. Their fingerprints were all over 9/11. What the hell WAS Iraq about? A diversion, and, it's working with some of you jokers. Saudi Arabia was the perpetrator of the terrorist attacks on America. It isn't that hard, folks.

Saudi Arabia hunted down Al qaeda terrorists. What was to gain by attacking the US for the Saudi Government? Without our help, they would be open to attack by Iran at their leisure?

By the same reasoning, why would we attack the Saudi people for what a few of their countryman did? Using that logic, we should have executed every single Japanese-American after Pearl Harbor.

You have been reading too many conspiracy theories and not doing enough thinking on your own, if that is possible.

Very true

Instead...we attacked Iraq

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. That's why we never invaded until March of 2003, 18 months later.

No shit

Bush never would have gotten approval to invade Iraq if not for post 9-11 hysteria

"We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud"

If he wanted to, he could have invaded Iraq immediately. You just don't want to recognize the facts. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and those who say they were are simply confused by their own ignorance. The Bush administration touted Iraq's ties to terror, but was not talking 9/11.

It's funny how all of this evidence of Bush claimed Iraq was involved in 9/11 mysteriously doesn't exist, while literally millions of libs will claim it did.

 

[irosie91]

Really. Despite the fact it was funded by, and most of the attackers were from Saudi Arabia. Their fingerprints were all over 9/11. What the hell WAS Iraq about? A diversion, and, it's working with some of you jokers. Saudi Arabia was the perpetrator of the terrorist attacks on America. It isn't that hard, folks.

Saudi Arabia hunted down Al qaeda terrorists. What was to gain by attacking the US for the Saudi Government? Without our help, they would be open to attack by Iran at their leisure?

By the same reasoning, why would we attack the Saudi people for what a few of their countryman did? Using that logic, we should have executed every single Japanese-American after Pearl Harbor.

You have been reading too many conspiracy theories and not doing enough thinking on your own, if that is possible.

Very true

Instead...we attacked Iraq

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. That's why we never invaded until March of 2003, 18 months later.

No shit

Bush never would have gotten approval to invade Iraq if not for post 9-11 hysteria

"We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud"

If he wanted to, he could have invaded Iraq immediately. You just don't want to recognize the facts. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and those who say they were are simply confused by their own ignorance. The Bush administration touted Iraq's ties to terror, but was not talking 9/11.

It's funny how all of this evidence of Bush claimed Iraq was involved in 9/11 mysteriously doesn't exist, while literally millions of libs will claim it did.

for the record-----the jerks also falsely claim "BUSH SAID SADDAM HAS NUCLEAR BOMBS"<<NOPE

 

[irosie91]

If our president back on 9/11 had BALLS or channeled Harry Truman, Saudi Arabia would have turned into glass hours after 9/11. Still, we let them get away outrageous provocations like mass murder and a act of war. WHY? Why did we attack Iraq instead? WHY? What the hell did Iraq have to do with ANYTHING?

That would have been remarkably stupid.

First, we didn't get attacked by Saudi Arabia. We were attacked by individual Saudis. Attacking Saudi Arabia after 911 would make as much sense as nuking Washington DC after Oklahoma City.

Second, Saudi Arabia is our closest ally in the region. Attacking them would have been akin to attacking say, the UK in terms of strategic insanity. We would have lost the trust of every nation on earth, including our allies. As if we would nuke our closest allies, we can't be trusted not to attack anyone.

Third, Saudi Arabia contains Mecca, the holiest site in Islam. Destroying it would been a declaration of war on over a billion people.

Fourth, it took weeks to figure out exactly what had happened and support that with evidence. Nuking Saudi Arabia 'within hours' would have been done evidence free. We literally would have violated the nuclear taboo on a hunch.

the action on Iraq was not related to 9-11-01 except in the minds of jerks

 

[Faun]

Really. Despite the fact it was funded by, and most of the attackers were from Saudi Arabia. Their fingerprints were all over 9/11. What the hell WAS Iraq about? A diversion, and, it's working with some of you jokers. Saudi Arabia was the perpetrator of the terrorist attacks on America. It isn't that hard, folks.

Saudi Arabia hunted down Al qaeda terrorists. What was to gain by attacking the US for the Saudi Government? Without our help, they would be open to attack by Iran at their leisure?

By the same reasoning, why would we attack the Saudi people for what a few of their countryman did? Using that logic, we should have executed every single Japanese-American after Pearl Harbor.

You have been reading too many conspiracy theories and not doing enough thinking on your own, if that is possible.

Very true

Instead...we attacked Iraq

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. That's why we never invaded until March of 2003, 18 months later.

No shit

Bush never would have gotten approval to invade Iraq if not for post 9-11 hysteria

"We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud"

If he wanted to, he could have invaded Iraq immediately. You just don't want to recognize the facts. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and those who say they were are simply confused by their own ignorance. The Bush administration touted Iraq's ties to terror, but was not talking 9/11.

It's funny how all of this evidence of Bush claimed Iraq was involved in 9/11 mysteriously doesn't exist, while literally millions of libs will claim it did.

Many, many people b’lieved Iraq was involved in 9.11; not because they were confused but because the Bush Administration was pushing that narrative for a while...

On Dec. 9, 2001, Cheney said on "Meet The Press" that "it's been pretty well confirmed that he did go to Prague and he did meet with a senior official of the Iraqi intelligence service in Czechoslovakia last April, several months before the attack."

More at: Iraq, 9/11 Still Linked Cheney​

 

[irosie91]

Saudi Arabia hunted down Al qaeda terrorists. What was to gain by attacking the US for the Saudi Government? Without our help, they would be open to attack by Iran at their leisure?

By the same reasoning, why would we attack the Saudi people for what a few of their countryman did? Using that logic, we should have executed every single Japanese-American after Pearl Harbor.

You have been reading too many conspiracy theories and not doing enough thinking on your own, if that is possible.

Very true

Instead...we attacked Iraq

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. That's why we never invaded until March of 2003, 18 months later.

No shit

Bush never would have gotten approval to invade Iraq if not for post 9-11 hysteria

"We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud"

If he wanted to, he could have invaded Iraq immediately. You just don't want to recognize the facts. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and those who say they were are simply confused by their own ignorance. The Bush administration touted Iraq's ties to terror, but was not talking 9/11.

It's funny how all of this evidence of Bush claimed Iraq was involved in 9/11 mysteriously doesn't exist, while literally millions of libs will claim it did.

Many, many people b’lieved Iraq was involved in 9.11; not because they were confused but because the Bush Administration was pushing that narrative for a while...

On Dec. 9, 2001, Cheney said on "Meet The Press" that "it's been pretty well confirmed that he did go to Prague and he did meet with a senior official of the Iraqi intelligence service in Czechoslovakia last April, several months before the attack."

More at: Iraq, 9/11 Still Linked Cheney​

I have no doubt that the whole country was IMPRESSED with that little tidbit. I missed as did 99.99 %
of the rest of the American population. If Bush WANTED people to believe that SADDAM was IN ON IT----he would have HAD TO COME UP WITH A LOT MORE THAN THAT-----he didn't because he
didn't nor did he claim that Saddam has nuclear weapons. You are doing what people like you do----
grasing for straws

 

[rightwinger]

Really. Despite the fact it was funded by, and most of the attackers were from Saudi Arabia. Their fingerprints were all over 9/11. What the hell WAS Iraq about? A diversion, and, it's working with some of you jokers. Saudi Arabia was the perpetrator of the terrorist attacks on America. It isn't that hard, folks.

Saudi Arabia hunted down Al qaeda terrorists. What was to gain by attacking the US for the Saudi Government? Without our help, they would be open to attack by Iran at their leisure?

By the same reasoning, why would we attack the Saudi people for what a few of their countryman did? Using that logic, we should have executed every single Japanese-American after Pearl Harbor.

You have been reading too many conspiracy theories and not doing enough thinking on your own, if that is possible.

Very true

Instead...we attacked Iraq

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. That's why we never invaded until March of 2003, 18 months later.

No shit

Bush never would have gotten approval to invade Iraq if not for post 9-11 hysteria

"We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud"

If he wanted to, he could have invaded Iraq immediately. You just don't want to recognize the facts. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and those who say they were are simply confused by their own ignorance. The Bush administration touted Iraq's ties to terror, but was not talking 9/11.

It's funny how all of this evidence of Bush claimed Iraq was involved in 9/11 mysteriously doesn't exist, while literally millions of libs will claim it did.

Bush played his 9-11 card to bully Congress into invading Iraq.

We took it away after that

Lie by Lie: A Timeline of How We Got Into Iraq

 

[Faun]

Saudi Arabia hunted down Al qaeda terrorists. What was to gain by attacking the US for the Saudi Government? Without our help, they would be open to attack by Iran at their leisure?

By the same reasoning, why would we attack the Saudi people for what a few of their countryman did? Using that logic, we should have executed every single Japanese-American after Pearl Harbor.

You have been reading too many conspiracy theories and not doing enough thinking on your own, if that is possible.

Very true

Instead...we attacked Iraq

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. That's why we never invaded until March of 2003, 18 months later.

No shit

Bush never would have gotten approval to invade Iraq if not for post 9-11 hysteria

"We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud"

If he wanted to, he could have invaded Iraq immediately. You just don't want to recognize the facts. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and those who say they were are simply confused by their own ignorance. The Bush administration touted Iraq's ties to terror, but was not talking 9/11.

It's funny how all of this evidence of Bush claimed Iraq was involved in 9/11 mysteriously doesn't exist, while literally millions of libs will claim it did.

for the record-----the jerks also falsely claim "BUSH SAID SADDAM HAS NUCLEAR BOMBS"<<NOPE

He certainly implied it when, as justification for war with Iraq, he warned a “mushroom cloud” could be the “smoking gun” if action was not taken...

”Satellite photographs reveal that Iraq is rebuilding facilities at sites that have been part of its nuclear program in the past. Iraq has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes and other equipment needed for gas centrifuges, which are used to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons. If the Iraqi regime is able to produce, buy, or steal an amount of highly-enriched uranium a little larger than a single softball, it could have a nuclear weapon in less than a year. And if we allow that to happen, a terrible line would be crossed. Saddam Hussein would be in a position to blackmail anyone who opposes his aggression. He would be in a position to dominate the Middle East. He would be in a position to threaten America. And Saddam Hussein would be in a position to pass nuclear technology to terrorists. Some citizens wonder: After 11 years of living with this problem, why do we need to confront it now? There is a reason. We have experienced the horror of September 11. We have seen that those who hate America are willing to crash airplanes into buildings full of innocent people. Our enemies would be no less willing -- in fact they would be eager -- to use a biological, or chemical, or a nuclear weapon. Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud.” ~ George Bush, 10.8.2002​

 

[irosie91]

Very true

Instead...we attacked Iraq

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. That's why we never invaded until March of 2003, 18 months later.

No shit

Bush never would have gotten approval to invade Iraq if not for post 9-11 hysteria

"We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud"

If he wanted to, he could have invaded Iraq immediately. You just don't want to recognize the facts. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and those who say they were are simply confused by their own ignorance. The Bush administration touted Iraq's ties to terror, but was not talking 9/11.

It's funny how all of this evidence of Bush claimed Iraq was involved in 9/11 mysteriously doesn't exist, while literally millions of libs will claim it did.

for the record-----the jerks also falsely claim "BUSH SAID SADDAM HAS NUCLEAR BOMBS"<<NOPE

He certainly implied it when, as justification for war with Iraq, he warned a “mushroom cloud” could be the “smoking gun” if action was not taken...

”Satellite photographs reveal that Iraq is rebuilding facilities at sites that have been part of its nuclear program in the past. Iraq has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes and other equipment needed for gas centrifuges, which are used to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons. If the Iraqi regime is able to produce, buy, or steal an amount of highly-enriched uranium a little larger than a single softball, it could have a nuclear weapon in less than a year. And if we allow that to happen, a terrible line would be crossed. Saddam Hussein would be in a position to blackmail anyone who opposes his aggression. He would be in a position to dominate the Middle East. He would be in a position to threaten America. And Saddam Hussein would be in a position to pass nuclear technology to terrorists. Some citizens wonder: After 11 years of living with this problem, why do we need to confront it now? There is a reason. We have experienced the horror of September 11. We have seen that those who hate America are willing to crash airplanes into buildings full of innocent people. Our enemies would be no less willing -- in fact they would be eager -- to use a biological, or chemical, or a nuclear weapon. Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud.” ~ George Bush, 10.8.2002

​

^^^^^^ that statement by Bush was 100% accurate and realistic------you wanted lies?​

 

[Faun]

Very true

Instead...we attacked Iraq

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. That's why we never invaded until March of 2003, 18 months later.

No shit

Bush never would have gotten approval to invade Iraq if not for post 9-11 hysteria

"We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud"

If he wanted to, he could have invaded Iraq immediately. You just don't want to recognize the facts. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and those who say they were are simply confused by their own ignorance. The Bush administration touted Iraq's ties to terror, but was not talking 9/11.

It's funny how all of this evidence of Bush claimed Iraq was involved in 9/11 mysteriously doesn't exist, while literally millions of libs will claim it did.

Many, many people b’lieved Iraq was involved in 9.11; not because they were confused but because the Bush Administration was pushing that narrative for a while...

On Dec. 9, 2001, Cheney said on "Meet The Press" that "it's been pretty well confirmed that he did go to Prague and he did meet with a senior official of the Iraqi intelligence service in Czechoslovakia last April, several months before the attack."

More at: Iraq, 9/11 Still Linked Cheney​

I have no doubt that the whole country was IMPRESSED with that little tidbit. I missed as did 99.99 %
of the rest of the American population. If Bush WANTED people to believe that SADDAM was IN ON IT----he would have HAD TO COME UP WITH A LOT MORE THAN THAT-----he didn't because he
didn't nor did he claim that Saddam has nuclear weapons. You are doing what people like you do----
grasing for straws

99% of the population did not miss it. Most people were actually paying attention to what was going on. That’s why polls revealed some 3 out of 4 Americans believed Iraq was involved in 9.11 — Because the Bush Administration painted that picture.

 

[Faun]

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. That's why we never invaded until March of 2003, 18 months later.

No shit

Bush never would have gotten approval to invade Iraq if not for post 9-11 hysteria

"We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud"

If he wanted to, he could have invaded Iraq immediately. You just don't want to recognize the facts. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and those who say they were are simply confused by their own ignorance. The Bush administration touted Iraq's ties to terror, but was not talking 9/11.

It's funny how all of this evidence of Bush claimed Iraq was involved in 9/11 mysteriously doesn't exist, while literally millions of libs will claim it did.

for the record-----the jerks also falsely claim "BUSH SAID SADDAM HAS NUCLEAR BOMBS"<<NOPE

He certainly implied it when, as justification for war with Iraq, he warned a “mushroom cloud” could be the “smoking gun” if action was not taken...

”Satellite photographs reveal that Iraq is rebuilding facilities at sites that have been part of its nuclear program in the past. Iraq has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes and other equipment needed for gas centrifuges, which are used to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons. If the Iraqi regime is able to produce, buy, or steal an amount of highly-enriched uranium a little larger than a single softball, it could have a nuclear weapon in less than a year. And if we allow that to happen, a terrible line would be crossed. Saddam Hussein would be in a position to blackmail anyone who opposes his aggression. He would be in a position to dominate the Middle East. He would be in a position to threaten America. And Saddam Hussein would be in a position to pass nuclear technology to terrorists. Some citizens wonder: After 11 years of living with this problem, why do we need to confront it now? There is a reason. We have experienced the horror of September 11. We have seen that those who hate America are willing to crash airplanes into buildings full of innocent people. Our enemies would be no less willing -- in fact they would be eager -- to use a biological, or chemical, or a nuclear weapon. Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud.” ~ George Bush, 10.8.2002

​

^^^^^^ that statement by Bush was 100% accurate and realistic------you wanted lies?​

You unmitigated moron... that statement was not “100% accurate.” Hussein had not been rebuilding their nuclear facilities. The attempted purchase of Uranium was based on a fake document. The Uranium that was found in Iraq and subsequently brought to the U.S. still had the U.N. seals from when it was first discovered after the first Gulf war. And he tied it to 9.11 to play on America’s fears when Iraq had nothing to do with 9.11.